Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Butterfly v lloyds ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6142 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All

 

I used on-line banking to calculate all excess bank charges for the period of 2/7/2002 until the present day . To my amazement this figure was £3500 ( without interest) I have written to the bank using a template requesting that they repay all funds ( with schedule of charges). However my concerns are that currently i have an overdraft of £850 and also am in arrears with a personal loan due to a period of unemployment. The amount i owe does not exceed the amount i have been charged. I assume if the bank starts proceeding against me for these outstanding monies that i could make a counter claim for the monies that i am owed. ?

 

I have tried to open another bank account however i have been refused due to a poor credit rating ..

 

I issued the letter on the 26/2/2007 so i await with bated breath for the standard " bog Off " letter.... I have thought that i am not going to hang around on this and as soon as the 14 days elapse , if i have no joy i will issues the letter re; court action and then take the necessary steps through the small claims court . ( obviously using the Steps from the site )

 

To be honest this really scares me i am not legally minded etc... and generally would rather run than challenge !!! however i could really do with the money to pay off my over draft and bring by personal loans back inline !!! So in the end the bank gets it back .....

 

Anyway will keep this thread up to date with any new developments .....

Prem letter sent 26/2/2007:)

"bog Off" received 4/3/2007:mad:

LBA letter sent 9/3/2007:)

Money claim .com filed - 27/3/2007:)

Notice of issue received 29/3/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I'm at the LBA stage - im trying to get things in order . I have used on line banking to obtain info re; bank charges and have listed them on a spread sheet ( have been sent to the bank with prem letter). when it goes to court will i have to provide the statements or will the schedule of charges be enough ? if i need the statements will they except computer print outs from Lloylds on line banking.

 

Ohh one other thing is it correct to use this address- LLOYDS TSB BANK PLC

25 GRESHAM STREET

LONDON

EC2V 7HN

 

 

 

With thanks

 

 

 

Prem letter sent - 26/2/2007 -schedule of Charges included

 

LBA letter to be sent - 12/3/2007- Schedule of charges included

To contact MCOL 26/3/2007 .. WILL NEED HELP FROM THEN ON ......

Prem letter sent 26/2/2007:)

"bog Off" received 4/3/2007:mad:

LBA letter sent 9/3/2007:)

Money claim .com filed - 27/3/2007:)

Notice of issue received 29/3/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ok -just filling out mcol. I have to put in a daily rate of interest . My claim is for £3388- interest of £657.72. how do i work out the daily rate until my claim is finalized.

 

Please help me ..

Thank you

Prem letter sent 26/2/2007:)

"bog Off" received 4/3/2007:mad:

LBA letter sent 9/3/2007:)

Money claim .com filed - 27/3/2007:)

Notice of issue received 29/3/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

You need to find one of the Mods on here (their names are in green) click on their name and click on send a private message.

Good luck with your claim!

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

On my money claim on line form it states-

 

Do you wish to enter Judgment by Default or by Admission? Please select one of the options below:

spacer.gif The defendant has not filed an admission or defence to my claim

(Judgment by Default)

spacer.gif

You will need to decide, how and when you want the defendant to pay. You can ask for the Judgment to be paid by instalment or in one payment.

spacer.gif The defendant admits that all the money is owed

(Judgment by Admission)

spacer.gif

If the defendant has given a new address on the form of admission to which correspondence should be sent, update the defendant's details within the following Judgment request.

 

 

 

What do i do ? i dont understand it

Prem letter sent 26/2/2007:)

"bog Off" received 4/3/2007:mad:

LBA letter sent 9/3/2007:)

Money claim .com filed - 27/3/2007:)

Notice of issue received 29/3/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

up date -

 

Filed claim on line it was issued on the 28/3/2007. we are 12 days on and i have heard nothing. What should i do ? if i have to issue a judgment by default - what does this mean ? what is this process after this ?

Prem letter sent 26/2/2007:)

"bog Off" received 4/3/2007:mad:

LBA letter sent 9/3/2007:)

Money claim .com filed - 27/3/2007:)

Notice of issue received 29/3/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

up date -

 

Filed claim on line it was issued on the 28/3/2007. we are 12 days on and i have heard nothing. What should i do ? if i have to issue a judgment by default - what does this mean ? what is this process after this ?

 

Lloyds have 14 days from the date of issue to acknowledge - they then have 28 days from issue to file a defence so don't get too excited yet! IF they havn't filed a defence after the 28 days THEN you can issue a judgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received an acknowledgment from [problem] - i understand that i now what for there defense - when do i get the AQ ? Also do i send [problem] a schedule of charges now ? if yes is there a standard covering letter on here ? thank you

Prem letter sent 26/2/2007:)

"bog Off" received 4/3/2007:mad:

LBA letter sent 9/3/2007:)

Money claim .com filed - 27/3/2007:)

Notice of issue received 29/3/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...