Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕
    • Though it would be Highview you would  pursue. DCBL are nonentities-on their best day,
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
    • Six months of conflict have also taken a heavy economic toll.View the full article
    • the Town and Country [advertisments ] Regulations 2007 are not easy to understand. Most Council planing officials don't so it's good that you found one who knows. Although he may not have been right if the rogues have not been "controlling" in the car park for that long. The time only starts when the ANPR signs go up, not how long the area has been used as a car park.   Sadly I have checked Highview out and they have been there since at least 2014 . I have looked at the BPA Code of Practice version 8 which covers 2023 and that states Re Consideration and Grace Periods 13.3 Where a parking location is one where a limited period of parking is permitted, or where drivers contract to park for a defined period and pay for that service in advance (Pay & Display), this would be considered as a parking event and a Grace Period of at least 10 minutes must be added to the end of a parking event before you issue a PCN. It then goes on to explain a bit more further down 13.5 You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is. 13.6 Neither a consideration period or a grace period are periods of free parking and there is no requirement for you to offer an additional allowance on top of a consideration or grace period. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________So you have  now only overstayed 5 minutes maximum since BPA quote a minimum of 10 minutes. And it may be that the Riverside does have a longer period perhaps because of the size of the car park? So it becomes even more incumbent on you to remember where the extra 5 minutes could be.  Were you travelling as a family with children or a disabled person where getting them in and out of the car would take longer. Was there difficulty finding a space, or having to queue to get out of the car park . Or anything else that could account for another 5 minutes  without having to claim the difference between the ANPR times and the actual times.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Battle with Abbey


Boris Becca
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5943 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Abbey £4340.59 *WON* Jan 07

 

Abbey II MCOL 31/03/07 £8800.00

 

Please note..I AM NOT AN EXPERT ANYTHING WHAT I POST IS PURELY MY OPINION AND MAY BE WRONG IT IS JUST BASED ON MY UNDERSTANDING OR EXPERIENCE

 

Read my latest claim its a fast track potentially

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/61406-noobrider-abbey-take-2-a.html?highlight=noobrider

 

read my first claim which includes attending a directions hearing in court

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/10576-noobrider-abbey.html?highlight=noobrider

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

thankyou noobrider, I am gonna stay cool!!... for now! Yor all fantastic , thankgod I have you all to talk to. I am awaiting court date now, called court today to see if they had sent it out since the prelim. They had a new defence subbmitted by abbey today, could that in anyway of changed to disadvasntage me in veiw of the lloyds case?? I am probably being paranoid but as you have said, "if you dont know, ASK". I really dint know what I was doing and should of got help fisrt, NOW, i need to get this spot on. Thankyou Gary too you must be a very busy man.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding from Kate is that Abbey were ordered by the judge to submit a new defence within 14 days - this is becouse their defence originally was to object to your POC. Now you have amended your POC they then get the right to amend there defence as well.

 

Totally as expected, and nothing to do with the Lloyds thing.:)

 

You should hear from the court soon in the form of a "notice of allocation to the small claims track" - this will give you the court date and time, and directions.

 

You then submit your evidence (court bundle), then shortly after you should find that Abbey pay up.

 

Post the order as soon as you get it and we'll tell you what you need to do.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dear gary,

had a order and copy of new defene which i might say is exactly the same as the old one through.... would like you to see them, i now have a scanner but no fax at home, do you know how i can get it to you via scanner on the computer....or shall i just fax it to you from a shop!?!

thanx rebecca

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post the wording of the order up here?

 

The defence is highly likely to be the standard one so I'm not to concerned about seeing that.

 

Perhaps one of the Abbey regulars (noob?) could link you to a thread where the standard defence is posted so you can compare?

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rebecca, just read yr thread and wanna say well done for getting back on track, sounds like hard work to me :( (im not that far yet).

Will be watching in anticipation so i have an inkling what to expect myself as im terrified!!

Good luck girl

Bonnie;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have compared the new defence with the old and it is exactly the same, just a specific amount. so i am cool about that.the order as follows:

it is ordered that:

1, claimant has permission to amended paticulars of claim( copy handed to council at preliminary)

2. the defendant shall be permitted ,if so advised, to serve and file an amended defence by 4pm 0n 16th May.

3.With consent of the parties the claimbe allocated to the small claims trackto be heard on a date and time to be notifiedto the parties by the court, estimate 2 hours.

4.each party shall deliver to the other party and to the court office copies of all documents on wich the partie sintend to use at the hearing, no later than 14 days before the allocated hearing date.

5. copies of sighned statements setting out the evidence of all witnesses on whom each party intends to rely andcopies of decided cases and other legal material to be relied apon must be included in the documents mentioned in paragraph 3 above.

6. claimant to advise the court if case is settled.

7. claimant pay the defendants court fee of £65.00.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya :)

 

I have compared the new defence with the old and it is exactly the same, just a specific amount. so i am cool about that.the order as follows:

it is ordered that:

1, claimant has permission to amended paticulars of claim( copy handed to council at preliminary)

done already

2. the defendant shall be permitted ,if so advised, to serve and file an amended defence by 4pm 0n 16th May.

done already

3.With consent of the parties the claimbe allocated to the small claims trackto be heard on a date and time to be notifiedto the parties by the court, estimate 2 hours.

self explanitory - no action needed

4.each party shall deliver to the other party and to the court office copies of all documents on wich the partie sintend to use at the hearing, no later than 14 days before the allocated hearing date.

These are the 'standard small claims track' directions. This requires you to submit a bundle of the documents on which your claim relies to the court and Abbey no later than 14 days before the hearing. See the http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/33060-basic-court-bundle.html for most of what you need.

5. copies of sighned statements setting out the evidence of all witnesses on whom each party intends to rely andcopies of decided cases and other legal material to be relied apon must be included in the documents mentioned in paragraph 3 above.

A witness statement. Basically just the statement of evidence as posted on the previous page, but we'll rehead it and tighten it up a bit first. I see no harm in getting it in early, it may prompt them to settle earlier. I'll help you prepare this on Saturday or Sunday.

6. claimant to advise the court if case is settled.

Self explanitory

7. claimant pay the defendants court fee of £65.00.

Oh yes Kate mentioned that - have you paid it yet?

 

Keep the receipts of any paper, ink or other stationary and you can apply to get your costs back when they settle. Also keep a record of the time spent on the claim at the rate of £9.25 per hour, for the same reason.

 

Any questions just ask.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Gary, no I havnt paid it yet it was decidedn that I would pay it om settlement either in or out of court between the barrister and myself at the preliminary. Your help is so mich ppreciated once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're welcome. Complying with that order is the final hoop - your on the home straight now.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go. Send it to [email protected]

 

Dear Ms Kirkman,

 

You v Abbey Plc

Claim Number: *******

 

Further to our telephone conversation on **/**/**, I wish to stress once again that I do not intend to reconsider my position in respect of the amount at which these matters will be settled.

 

For the avoidance of doubt, I am fully amenable to an amicable settlement of this claim and am aware of my duty to mitigate my loss.

 

However, until such time as Abbey Plc discloses verifiable information concerning its true losses incurred (if any) as a result of my contractual breaches, I will contend that the exorbitant charges which have been so liberally and indiscriminately levied to my account are unenforceable in their entirety.

 

Upon disclosure of such costs information I will of course be happy to amend the value of my claim accordingly, in order that both parties may be in the same position as before the breach occurred - in accordance with the principles of common law upon which my claim is based.

 

Furthermore, I am wholly disappointed that you have chosen to erroneously refer to the case of Berwick -v- Lloyds as relevant in respect of my own claim against your client.

 

I consider this spurious reference to a case which holds no relevance whatsoever to be intimidatory and clearly intended to persuade me into accepting a derogatory sum in settlement of this claim. I therefore require your reference to this judgement to be retracted by return. If you do not do so, I intend to draw the courts attention to this matter forthwith.

 

Finally, I no longer wish to discuss these matters over the telephone. All communications and negotiations must hereinafter be in written form, whether by electronic mail or otherwise. Any further attempts at telephone contact will be regarded as harassment and dealt with accordingly.

 

A copy of my most recent schedule of charges is attached to this message for your due consideration.

 

Kind Regards

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me know when she responds.

 

I've got a feeling that a full settlement should'nt be far away now.:wink:

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Becca,

 

Did you send it? Any response yet?

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great. Let us know what she responds with.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry, should'nt be too long.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Becca,

 

We should probably start getting your bundle uptogether around now - have you had a solid date through from the court yet? If not it would be a good idea to ring them. Ask if a court date has been set. Tell them you have a directions order which needs to be complied with by 14 days before the hearing but obviously you don't know when that is without a hearing date.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either - its totally up to you. Your welcome to PM me if you'd prefer to keep it confidential.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just typed it out to you via pm. I have scanned it to my computer but havnt got a clue now how to bring it up on my thread, Might be interesting for others to see! Otherwise I will type it out again! dah !:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...