Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

bingo1981 vs Cahoot


Bingo1981
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6194 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there everyone

 

I sent a letter to Cahoot 14 Days ago detailing the charges that I wanted to claim and this morning I recieved a letter from the Abbey saying;

 

"Dear Bingo1981

 

thank you for contacting us and I am sorry that you have been so unhappy that you have felt you must complain.

 

One of my team will be responsible for investigating you complaint and I have enclosed out Complaints leaflet, which explains our procedure for doing this. High quality customer service is of great importance to us at Abbey and we will do everything we can to resolve your complaint in a timeley and satifactory manner.

 

I know it is important to you that we resolve you complaint quickly, but we want to complete a thorough investigation and sometimes this can take time. If we have not contacted you before then, we will write to you in four weeks to let you know what is happening.

 

If you have employed someone to handle you complaint on your behalf, please note:

employing a third party complaint-handling firm, or a solicitor, or financial advisor does not affect how we review your complaint. Please be aware that:

Abbey does not charge you to investigate your complaint

Abbey will not be liable for any costs incurred if you do decide to employ a third party to handle your complaint during this review

Abbey, in general, will only make payment directly to account holder(s) if your complaint is upheld and redress is due.

 

Although I do not know what the outcome will be, I do hope that we will be able to find a solution that you are happy with.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Andrew Nelson

Business Manager"

 

Now i'm a little confused, I have a second letter ready to send when they try to fob me off saying that i'm not happy with their response, should I send this now and if so do I send it to The Abbey or to Cahoot(who I originally sent the letter to)? Or should I wait for them to investigate as they say in the letter and wait for the response to the investigation?

 

Great work you're all doing here by the way.

 

Many thanks in advance

 

Bingo1981

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a similar letter when I complained to Abbey. I waited 8 weeks in the end and then I emailed cahoot with a LBA, Abbey then responded asking me to re-send details they already had, saying their investigation could take another 8 weeks and that I could not complain to the FSA until they had completed their investigation.

I told them they had already had my complaint 8 weeks and that I had no intention of complaing to the FSA and the courts only require me to give them 2 weeks anyway.

It is up to you if you want to wait. Giving them time to complete their investigation shows that you have given them every opportunity to reach a fair conclusion. But dont expect a satisfactory answer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi everyone

Right, I went through all the stages that this sort of web site advises to claim back my bank charges, sent the letters in the right order got the responses sent more letters......eventually took the bank(cahoot) to court on the MCOL website and this morning I have just received a copy of their defence. Now will I have to actually go to court? Will I have to appoint a solicitor? Will I lose in court if I don't because I'll be up against some hotshot solicitor?

Just basically want to know if this has happened to anyone else and what I need to do next.

Yours worriedly

Bingo1981

Sorry I also posted this in another forum!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...