Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GP Private prescriptio Charges


Rossi111
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6224 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have a private prescription for 'the little blue pill' which I pay the chemist £35. In the last month, my GP has started charging £13 on top of this for signing the repeat prescription charge. This seem outlandish and on a par with the bank charges. Is there any way I could claim these back as unfair charges ?

I cannot afford to keep paying £50 for 4 tablets.

Any help would be welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

erm, why don't you buy for much less from a certified internet source? Will be more like £15 per month (plus postage). On a med note, long term or persistent use should be avoided even where your doctor is satisfied that it is the best alternative - but I presume since you have gone through your gp (albeit privately) that they have made you aware of the side effects :)

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

The GP is charging for the service of signing a private prescription, they're entitled to do that and it's not a penalty charge, so the principles for bank charges don't apply.

 

The British Medical Association does give some recommended charges but I've not read through them, also I don't think GP's are bound by them. If it's a regular repeat try negotiating a lower price with the GP.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I was under the impression (from reading articles on the BMA website) that GPs could not charge patients registered with their practice for Private Prescriptions; i.e. they could only charge patients not registered with them. Has this recently changed?

 

Cheers,

WE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting, I think I've found the regulations you refer to. Perhaps there's some other reason - maybe it's an administrator making the charge thinking it's for a private prescription for overseas use, or perhaps something has changed in the regulations?

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Drugs for erectile dysfunction are only available on the NHS if you have an underlying medical condition that is on a particular list (diabetes, etc). Your GP is essentially charging for the time it takes him to review and issue the prescription, as well as the cost of putting the systems in place to do that, and a bit of profit (Each practice is a business so anything that doesn't bring money in actually costs the practice money - should your GP pay for the privilege of your erection?). You don't have to get the prescription from your GP, so shop around. Is £50 a month good value for four pleasant evenings? It seems lower than the cost of most dates!

 

GPs can't charge their NHS patients for private consultations, but they can charge fees for non NHS services supplied to NHS patients (eg insurance forms etc.). NHS guidelines specifically exclude prescriptions for certain drugs such as antimalarials for holidays, and also "recreational" erectile dysfunction drugs.

:D <-- MazzaB, financial warrior! (*with a little help from my [real] flexible friends.......*) Bank ---> :mad:

 

:) Please click on my scales if you find my comments helpful! (or ya think i'm sexy ;))

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...