Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You could also ask about Jeremy Hunt and the multiple flats purchase he didn't declare properly. Or Lord Ashcroft about how much tax he saved while he was a non-dom. According to Private Eye, in Ashcroft's book he says Rayner avoided paying £3,500 to HMRC. Meanwhile he's estimated to have saved £112m by being a non-dom between 2000 and 2010.
    • Can you still log into your account and see if it will accept a defence ?
    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) 'possible (lol) electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer     Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shine v Nationwide


ireatianu
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6091 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Claiming on behalf of o/h and this is the journey so far;

 

24.02.07 sar made

 

08.03.07 £10 cheque cashed

 

14.03.07 o/h went to local branch to say no stmts received but cheque cashed.

 

24.03.07 Statements received from 1999-2004 (when o/h closed the account)

 

26.03.07 to post prelim letter asking for £650.50 in charges and £49.19 in interest charged on penalties, total of £699.69.

 

Will update when there are further developments.

 

 

All the best with your various claims and have fun while doing it.

 

regards,

 

ireatianu

any comment made is just my humble opinion....and what do i know:?: :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi i read your thread and you say 26/3/07 post prelim... asking for £???? and interest!! you dont actually ask for the 8% until it goes to court.. and have you completed the spreadsheet to send with the prelim..

 

im sure you have read the step by step threads and are doing it correctly but how i read it ~ i just wanted to check that you got it all straight before you send it..

 

yep keep us posted on your progress.. :)

if i have been of any help please add to my reputation by clicking on middle icon bottom left.. thank you..

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All,

Thanks Rightfully mine, its the interest attributable to the charges that I have asked for along with the charges.

 

No reply from Nationwide, LBA going off today.

 

Ireatianu

any comment made is just my humble opinion....and what do i know:?: :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

I sure am living life on the edge:)

 

I got the same reply to both prelim and lba, in lba i warned that if they were not going to pay up, I will then be going for ci, I have now redone prelim asking for contractual interest, as I am claiming from 1999, the small sum of about £600 has now become £2000 :p, they have until 14/05/07 b4 i send lba second time around.

 

sure feels like a roller coaster ride, i intend to enjoy every bit of it.

 

will keep updating this thread to let you know whats happening.

 

regards,

 

Ireatianu

any comment made is just my humble opinion....and what do i know:?: :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All,

Can any one help me, where do I get a POC for contractaul interest, I have been searching for Bong's thread to no avail, I have tried several places, I must be searching with my eyes closed:) , all help greatly appreciated.

 

Regards,

 

Ireatianu

any comment made is just my humble opinion....and what do i know:?: :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Haha 1

Kelly

Settled: Nationwide £372.55

Before you do anything read this:

Guide to Reclaiming Bank Charges

 

Most questions can be answered by checking out these links:

Frequently Asked Questions

Step by step instructions

Letter Templates

And don't forget to use the search facility! Chances are your question has already been answered on another thread. Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All,

 

Nationwide has said they intend to defend and have 28 days from 5th of July.

 

o/h got a letter with a cheque for a paltry 20% of claim along with their own schedule of charges saying if he disagrees with their figures the onus is on him to send them yet another schedule;

 

Please what do you think of my reply below, all comments appreciated.

 

regards,

 

Ireatianu

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx. I respectfully decline your offer of £xxx and have included the cheque you supplied in respect of that offer.

 

Paragraph 2 of your letter states: “I’m enclosing a cheque totalling £xxx of which £xx is a refund of charges, £abc to cover your court costs and a further £xx which represents interest calculated at court rate of 8% from the date charges were applied to the date of refund.”

 

The above paragraph indicates that you are aware that I have begun court proceedings against your good selves, which is why your offer includes £xx court costs. It can then be reasonably inferred that you are in receipt of my Particulars of claim and schedule of charges forwarded to you by the court. If so, would you be kind enough to comment on the following;

 

a. The POC (Particulars of claim) gives you detailed information about the basis of my claim, showing the amount asked for, the time period for which these charges relate to and the interest due thereon.

b. Attached also was a schedule of charges, paragraph 4 of your letter states “If you believe that this figure is incorrect the onus is on you, as the Claimant, to provide us with a specific breakdown of the amount and date of each charge that you claim has been debited to your account”

 

Correct me if I am wrong but I do believe that your request in ‘b’ above is an abuse of process, the above information has been sent to you on three different occasions as follows:

- along with my preliminary request for the refund of charges on xx/xx/xx

- on xx/xx/xx along with my Letter Before Action

- finally, a copy of my POC along with the schedule of charges was forwarded to you by the court.

 

Please be informed that whilst I will send you another copy of the schedule of charges, I intend to confirm from the court that the schedule has already been sent to you, and this being so inform them of your request for another schedule of charges, which I believe to be a tactic to delay the course of justice.

 

My claim is for £xxxxxx as outlined in my Particulars of Claim, plus court costs of £cccc plus other costs incurred and this claim will continue until payment is made in full.

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

mememe

any comment made is just my humble opinion....and what do i know:?: :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...