Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sparky 27 vs Yorkshire bank.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6230 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Helloooo:) First post in this forum and a bit of a way down the line with my claim from the Yorkshire.

I am at the stage where I sent in my M.C.O.L form and am now waiting to hear from the bank who have one about 1 week left to reply before the 28 days are up. Unsure of what's the banks next strategy but am ready to take it to the wire.

Wish me luck friends.;)

I'm not getting mad.... I'm getting even

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck Sparky!

 

How much are you claiming?

 

Thanks Lads/Lasses.

I'm claiming £2020 up to now but as every day passes the interest goes on;)

I'm not getting mad.... I'm getting even

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, particularly following the Whistleblower there is ample evidence to invoke s.32 of the Limitation Act.

 

Did you use the SAR template from here? If so that does not limit the request to six years. In which case send a reminder saying that they are obliged to send all information they hold on you irrespective of date. There is no need to send any more money as they have not fully complied with your initial request.

 

All the best

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, particularly following the Whistleblower there is ample evidence to invoke s.32 of the Limitation Act.

 

Did you use the SAR template from here? If so that does not limit the request to six years. In which case send a reminder saying that they are obliged to send all information they hold on you irrespective of date. There is no need to send any more money as they have not fully complied with your initial request.

 

All the best

 

Zoot

 

No mate I actually used the template from Martin's site. Sorry to say I had no idea this forum existed:oops: \but to make amends I'v reccomended it to all I know and put the link on some fishing forums I am on with a very good response

I'm not getting mad.... I'm getting even

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to butt in but I am at a similar stage to you sparky, I have filed my MCOL but I also got my S.A.R template off martins website and although I had older charges I just claimed the last 6 years.

Is it best to await the outcome of the current claim before requesting the older charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, particularly following the Whistleblower there is ample evidence to invoke s.32 of the Limitation Act.

 

Did you use the SAR template from here? If so that does not limit the request to six years. In which case send a reminder saying that they are obliged to send all information they hold on you irrespective of date. There is no need to send any more money as they have not fully complied with your initial request.

 

All the best

 

Zoot

 

Zoot,

 

I have a claim which CB have just sent in a defence, it is for 1996 to 2001 charges and for £7500 inc interest. Can you help point me to details of the whistleblower info that helps with the S32?

 

I have seen Bankfodders sticky in the YB/CB thread but it doesn't elaborate on what the evidence is.

 

I guess I will need this in the next couple of weeks as I will be getting my AQ in.

 

I do have a thread where I will be posting the defence they entered (a little later today).

 

Debt_mountain vs Clydesdale

If I have helped click my scales....

 

Find my threads by clicking here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparky,

 

Once they submit their defence the claim will be transferred to your local court. It will be interesting to see if they have amended their defence in light of the Whistle blower!

 

Next thing for you to take care of will be filling in the allocation questionairre. Have a look in the bank templates library to read up on filling this in. Makes sure you use the Draft Order for Directions and include a specific request for disclosure of CYNtheSYS.

 

Best of luck

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparky,

 

Once they submit their defence the claim will be transferred to your local court. It will be interesting to see if they have amended their defence in light of the Whistle blower!

 

Next thing for you to take care of will be filling in the allocation questionairre. Have a look in the bank templates library to read up on filling this in. Makes sure you use the Draft Order for Directions and include a specific request for disclosure of CYNtheSYS.

 

Best of luck

 

Zoot

 

Hi Zoot. Right the yorkshire have sent me a copy of their "Defence".

Do I need to do anything now, or will the court transfer the case automatically to a court near myself?

Thanks, Sparky

I'm not getting mad.... I'm getting even

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparky,

 

The case will be automatically transferred.

 

Is their defence the standard one they have been sending? Are they still claiming the charges are a genuine pre-estimate?

 

Yes Zoot. Item7 states

"Quote". It is denied that the Charges or any of them were a disproportionate penalty and unenforcable as alledged in the Particulars of Claim. The charges were a fee for the service provided by the Bank and the claimant. Further and in any event, the Charges were a genuine pre-estimate of cost resulting from the Customers' failure to keep within the agreed overdraft limit on the account. "Unquote."

I'm not getting mad.... I'm getting even

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are probably out of options Zoot, or can't think of anything else to say, then again perhaps they never intend to go to court so don't care, what ever it is the noose tightens

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its rather silly signing a statement of truth on a court document when the facts are in the public domain that render the stated facts untrue.

 

I would be very tempted to write a letter to the court and copy it to Yorkshire Bank questioning this very issue.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone know where I can get an original copy of Y.B's conditions dating around 1998,? It would be interesting to see where the word "Fee" crops up in relation to the charges.

Or maybe it does:confused:

I'm not getting mad.... I'm getting even

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote to my branch, sent them a SAR and spoke to them on the phone asking for copies of documents i had signed when opening my account and only managed to get a copy of my Index card. They did say i didn't have a contract as such only the T&C's when opening the account and when i pressed them for a copy they could only come up with an up to date copy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparky,

 

Once they submit their defence the claim will be transferred to your local court. It will be interesting to see if they have amended their defence in light of the Whistle blower!

 

Next thing for you to take care of will be filling in the allocation questionairre. Have a look in the bank templates library to read up on filling this in. Makes sure you use the Draft Order for Directions and include a specific request for disclosure of CYNtheSYS.

 

Best of luck

 

Zoot

 

Hi Zoot, I just got my letter transferring my claim to Bury County Court and it says, "Quote" The filing of an allocation questionnaire be dispensed with in this case unless the District Judge at the court of transfer orders otherwise."Unquote"

 

Is this normal ???

I'm not getting mad.... I'm getting even

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...