Jump to content
style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4692 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I have been with Bos since I was a student,I knew that they had totally ripped me off with charges but didnt realise it was to the tune of £2500 until I got the statements! they also lodged a default notice against me,I have since settled the account,but more on that later.

 

using the template letters on this site and some info from the govan law site (i'm in scotland btw) i sent off my prelim letter. Got a very speedy response from their customer service team saying someone would be intouch. right enough I got a phonecall the next day, the guy wanted to discuss my complaint,he was actually very nice about it saying he understood where I was coming from and was I willing to forget about it for oh... say £213, I told him i would be looking for the full amount...

 

he whined on for a bit longer then offered me £400,again I said no, then he said "ok in this situation we have been told to refund your worst 6mths worth of charges" which in my case was £713, (just shows you how much they were screwing me at the time), iIrefused again and he said ok i know how you feel etc,but they were not prepared to refund the charges.I have since got a letter say we are sorry you choose not to accept our offer etc. One interesting thing in the letter they claimed the charges were to cover their costs,which I assume is good as this will never stand up in court.:-D

 

Right now I am about to send them off the LBA from the govan law website with some alterations. will update this thread as and when they reply.

 

Just finally I have a question regarding the removal of the default on my account,at the time I was defaulted I was ~£760 over my od limit,albeit only for a few weeks or so. The default came about as a result of my going £700 over my limit in just a couple of weeks,due to checks cashed etc.

 

In the 8mths prior to this they had charged me ~£900 in charges,am I right to argue that the default was soley due to the illegal charges they levied on my account,as the charges compounded my financial difficulty, and prevented me getting back on my feet,which culminated in the default :???:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, welcome to the forum.

 

It's a good idea to include the fact that you require the removal of the default in both your LBA and your claim. this means that if they want to settle without going to court, they'll have to settle that part too. You don't need to add anything fancy, just something like:

 

"I would like to ask the Court to order the removal of any prejudicial information which HBOS PLC may have passed on to third parties regarding my account. In particular I would like to ask the Court to order the removal of any Default Notice which may have been posted on the Claimant’s credit report, because if it had not been for their unlawful charges, the Account would not have been in default."

 

They may offer you your money back but make no mention of the Default. It's important that you not agree to anything which doesn't EXPLICITLY include removing the default. In particular, you need to make sure that their definition of 'removing' it isn't just marking it as 'settled', otherwise it will still be on your file. I think you can afford to be quite hardball about this, because removing the default is very easy for them to do (they have unlimited computerised access to your credit file!), and it costs them nothing to do. It is inconceivable that they will spend thousands of pounds in court for something which is essentially meaningless to them (they're unlikely ever to lend you any money again, and you're unlikely to ask).

 

One other thing to watch for. They may threaten to close your account. The jury's very much out on whether or not they're allowed to do this, but it is prudent to open an alternative account elsewhere, just in case.

 

Please feel free to come back and ask if you need any further advice, and please remember to keep the forum updated on your progess.:)

 

Good luck

  • Confused 1

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the excellent advice.

 

I sent off the LBA inluding the wording about the default and got a rather snotty reply telling me that they stood by their original decison not to refund the full amount of charges and that they could assure me that the charges had not been recorded on my credit record!!. Either ,they were too thick, to understand my argument, that £2300 worth of charges including £715 in the last 6 mths eventually put me in some financial difficulty, and led to the default, or they are dodging the question.

 

In anycase I submitted my first claim today, for £742.00 plus 8% interest, will keep this thread updated as things progress.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic was closed on 11 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4692 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you
Please fill in your quit date here
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?




  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • 30 Day Right To Reject - Vehicle Casualty Report. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415585-30-day-right-to-reject-vehicle-casualty-report/
      • 57 replies
×
×
  • Create New...