Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sledge vs A&L: This time it's war.


TheSledge
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6243 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello. Bit of background.

 

Had all my savings, my mortgage and current account with A&L. Although I thought their web interface sucked, I stuck with them for 5 years. Occasionally (normally when changing jobs and therefore my pay day moved, hence mismatching my cashflows) I would go into unforseen overdraft and incur those £25 charges (normally in bundles of 3 or 4 at a time such as when all the utilities go out - £25 charges per £20 debit - pretty crap). I would call and get half of them back most times. I always thought they were a rip off and after the recent publicity I know my thoughts were well justified. So when it happened again I asked to close my account. They tried to offer me half back again, but I said no, actually your website sucks, you don't have offset mortages and basically I don't like the cut of your jib. I asked then to take whatever I owed and transfer the rest to my new bank account, and then close the account. They did this, though despite knowing a charge was about to hit my account didn't allow for this and so when they cleared my account and this new charge arrived I was hit for another unauthorised overdraft charge (£25 for the payment and £25 for the overdraft incursion). So now my account couldn't be closed. So I went to the branch, asked how much to pay - they said £50 -I paid in used unmarked tenners. Job done I thought.

 

But my account still remained open strangely. Then they debited the overdraft interest - a matter of pennies, and thus hit me with £25 of new charges. At this point I got angry. I deposited one hundred pounds of cash and called them to say I wanted my statements since I intended to sue. Didn't hear back, until I received a cheque from them for the amount of cash left in my account, but minus ANOTHER £25 for unauthorised OD and a note saying account closed.

 

Pretty miffed, made several calls, all sorts of promises to refund the charge, but nothing happened. Sent the first letter asking for my statements with a cheque for £10 - and yesterday received the cheque back along with a BLANK compliments slip. So no idea what they're doing or why they sent the cheque back.

 

Called their group complaints line, got a nice woman who said she'd call them and sort it. She called back in a few hours and said it was being handled. Obviously I only have her word for that...

 

So here I am - all sorts of lies, and plainly poor customer service later. As it happens I work in investment and am an approved person (i.e. approved by the FSA to conduct investment business etc) and I can say that they have broken many of the Conduct of Business rules when it comes to dealing with what the FSA term "private customers" - i.e. Joe Public.

 

I'm appalled that they would not acknowledge my letter but instead just sent my cheque back with no note whatsoever. If I did that to a client, I would a) not see him again and b) get fired. A clear violation of the rule (#7) called "Customer Communications" which states that all communication should be clear, and not misleading. They have also lied on several occasions when they said they would repay the ludicrous charges occured due do them not closing my account correctly, and asking for the wrong settlement amounts. Needless to say lying to a customer violates several COBs and generally leads to public mistrust - public trust in the financial system is listed as one of the 4 statutory goals of the FSA.

 

Anyway, for any who have read thus far - what is next - do I actually need to send a registered letter requesting statements to prevent the completely unprofessional conduct that occurs when they ignore letters and lie about receving them? Seems amazing - imagine if other businesses and professions behaved in this manner. Oh well. I would love to take guys all the way to court and do them for lying to and misleading customers. But at this stage it'd be nice to stick it to them on a public forum and get some cash out of them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers mate - yep I sent the form SAR letter under provisions of DPA 1998. Guess this is just one of the many ways they can stall you - it seems, after reading all the threads that their responses are gradually evolving. They know they have to pay up and it seems on small claims they do before court (since the court costs are disproportinate to what they would save) - otherwise they are playing the odds game - even if 1/10 people get cold feet or lazy then it's worth them playing this drawn out endgame - so unprofessional, but unfortunately, so expected by financial services firms in the UK currently - but God help a poor doctor or teacher who behaves slightly unprofessionally, they get their ass sent back to them in a sling. One law for the workers, another for the money men. Same old.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...