Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lloyds settled NOW its round 2 the Finale


judi3
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6204 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been successful in our personal account and non ltd account .

The total unfortunatly paid off a loan we were forced to take due to the unlawful charges .

and also the sneaky 642.88 ppi which we defo stated in english "no thank you " .

 

I have today made made a case with the financial ombudsman that we We were missed sold the ppi.

and that we were also mis sold a business loan to cover unlawful charges and that We had requested a small firms loan guarentee scheme due to our circumstances in sucssesfully tendering for a large contract .

 

Dividing the complaints as im sure the ppi will be a doddle,

 

But its the loan that has ruined our lives and the consiquences of this action are massive finacially and on my family .

 

They have now Eight weeks to conduct a investigation on their actions and i will provide as much details to them and this thread .

 

No matter what they say i know im right but i have no idea of what i would accept to resolve it.

 

 

will keep you all updated

 

wish me luck x

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a loan with lloyds tsb that i took out to pay off my overdraft and credit card i have read the terms and conditions of the loan and in there it does not say anything about making me pay the loan off,

 

if i get my charges back will they make me use the money to pay of my loan and can they beacuse the way i am reading terms and conditions they cant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

if i get my charges back will they make me use the money to pay of my loan and can they beacuse the way i am reading terms and conditions they cant?

 

i cant see how they could make you do that, maybe if you hadnt made payments for a long time they would use it for the loan as otherwise they wouldnt get any money. but if you have been meeting the payment they would make more money out of the interest than just paying it off with their own money.

 

i have a lloyds loan i used to buy my car, but ive never been behind on a payment on it, so i cnat see how they could force me to pay the loan off with my "winnings"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

This is a very interesting case - please keep us updated. I am currently taking Lloyds to court over bank charges, but had two loans with them in the past (now settled) that had PPI that I didn't want, and when I went in to cancel it or rearrange a loan without they referred me to their debt department.

 

I calculate that in the time I had the loans I paid £1629 and £388 in PPI respectively. Also, the PPI was put onto the loan and therefore attracted interest, which apparently is an option rather than the norm.

 

As soon as my current battle with Lloyds is over I'll be going after this.

 

What information have you sent to the Ombudsman?

 

Thanks

 

Gareth

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Judi,

My case is also very simmerler and the bank are taking me to court for the loans but!!! yet the owe us nearly £13,000 in chargers. I am fighting this all the way and have just put in a defence with the help of wonderful memebers on this site, read the latter half of my thread maybe it will help.

Good Luck.

Pen

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

letter from llyods .

Iam writing to let you know we have recieved your complaint from the FOS and to let you know how sorry i am to learn that you're unhappy with us and thank you for taking time to get in touch .

it is important that your concerns get the attention they deserve so i willl get a case officer to investigate it should take 4 weeks if not another 4 .

 

Condensed the last bit but their apolagy should have been given the last 30 million times we said stated your not acting in our best intrests .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

ok change my smily to not so confident

 

advice please

 

I had initially contacted the financial ombudsman service for advice on my situation and they raised a skeleton complaint in anticipation for the bank to contact myself for a full investigation of my concerns.

I have only received one letter from them advising that it is important that our concerns get the attention they deserve so I will get a case officer to investigate and I assumed that they would enter constructive discussion with me and to receive the full extent of my complaint.

MY CONCERNS

In may 2002 I attended a meeting in your xxxx due to receiving excessive unlawful penalties against my personal and company account ,we advised the manager previously and again at this meeting that we had successfully tendered in 2001 for xxxxxxxxxx contract .we also advised the manager that we had successfully tendered for xxxxxxcontract which was guaranteed work for the next 3 years we had already two established members of staff and had taken on new trainees xxxxxxxxxxxxscheme and we were anticipating employing new members .

We specifically enquired for guidance on obtaining a sflgs finance to aid our expansion but we were pressurised into the business loan to stop occurring any further penalties.

We specifically declined the business loan repayment insurance due to xxxxx being self employed, and a xxxxx accident would not cover our requirements.

.

IN RESPONSE TO YOUR DESION

We were led to believe that we had signed an agreement for £5000.

We given no other option but to refinance our overdraft onto a loan as the majority of the overdraft was unlawful penalties and overdraft charges and would increase and seriously hindered any budgeting and cash flow.

BLRI was not given as optional product and we never received a policy booklet.

It was only apparent that we had BLRI when we made a SAR in 07/2006.

We were also not advice that their would be an £100 arrangement fee.

The balance of the loan £542 was the only cash flow we for our company as they withdrew any overdraft to aid our companies growth and has resulted in serious consequences and the eventual closure of the company.

The bank was fully aware of my circumstances but continued to affect my credit rating and my reputation and cause substantial damage and distress to me and my family

During the period in which the Accounts were operating you debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of myself and also charged interest on the charges once applied.

The charges debited to the Account are punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the Lloyds ; exceed any alleged actual loss to yourselves in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the myself and are not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich yourselves and exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

 

The contractual provision that permits the Claimant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (1999), the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the common law.

 

 

 

I believe that our repayment of £xxxx in Feb 2007 was forced upon us and that the bank has profited from a debt that was written off and passed to debt collectors a clear breach of my data protection rights.

I believe that the business manager was irresponsible and was encouraged to miss sell an unsuitable product which did not place our best interest as customers and as a small expanding enterprise.

If we had not occurred penalties on our account we would not have needed to obtain this loan and would have arranged finance to aid our companies growth and to its full potential .

 

The original loan was taken out in order to repay borrowing on an overdraft to to the Bank biz and personal

99% of that original overdrafts was due to additional charges made to you by the bank in the way of returned item charges and direct debits etc

then we effectively took out a loan in order to partly repay money to the bank that they had taken from us unlawfully in the first place. And then paying additional interest on unlawfull charges !

 

Then when i applied for the charges we payed almost 4k back to close the account

 

 

 

The responce from lloyds

they have not upheld my complaint

they do not accept that they mis sold the loan ans biz loan repayment ins

they believe we are poles apart and will not enter further discussion .

what products or services we offer or renew for our customers is for our commercial judgement we are therefore entitled to decide not to renew an ocerdraft but to offer to reschdule the borrowing onto a loan .we'd do this if we felt it appropriate that the borrowing was repaid and needed structured means of repayment .ultimatley how you repaid the overdraft from savings aloan with us or borrowing elsewhere was up to you .

 

once the loan was arranged the blri underwriters will have written to you to give you a short cooling off period in hich you could cancel the optional blri free of charge you didnt choose to do this at the time

 

we are entitled to insist that you have suitable insurance cover for a loan you would be free to arrange such cover with an insurer of your choice it is of course quicker and more straight forward to arrange it through us.

 

help please do i have a case or am i poles apart

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...