Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi,   Someone who isn't me (SWIM) bought a parking ticket for a car park whilst on holiday paid the correct fee input their car reg went to the shops and then left in their vehicle within the required timeframe. The car park operates ANPR and a few weeks later SWIM received a PCN despite having followed all the rules of the car park. The parking company is saying that they have no record of a payment for SWIMs car. SWIM wrote to the parking company explaining that they paid and followed all the rules of the car park however the parking company replied with a standard template letter and are now adding more to their PCN and threatening court action. Unfortunately before receiving the PCN SWIMs partner threw the parking ticket away as part of cleaning out the car after the holiday.     The parking company has pictures of SWIMs car entering and leaving the car park but is saying that no number plate was entered into their machine. This is not correct the number plate was definitely inputted and the fee paid in cash. The car park is in a shocking state of disrepair and there have been several cases of the company issuing PCNs due to their own faulty equipment.     The parking company have taken people to court before and lost. However, the defendants in those cases had their tickets as proof of payment. If SWIM is taken to court their argument would be that the private parking company's (PPC) equipment must have been faulty and that the only evidence the PPC has is the car driving into and out of the carpark.  They have no real evidence of no payment. In fact CCTV footage would show a payment has been made, furthermore there were no other cars in the nearly derelict car park so if a payment was registered on the machine but not a number plate that would have to be SWIMs.    Dose SWIM no longer having a ticket ruin their chance of winning if this ends up in court? SWIM is prepared to take it to court if needed.   Are there any similar cases of people winning in court despite no longer having their parking ticket?   
    • Social services need to be given on training on how to provide direct payments! 
    • I have written to them to advise of income change and employment change .. they haven't even acknowledged the income change ..they just stated I have advised about how I'm paying cmi but not addressed how I'm paying the arrears ..I have a court order in palace to pay the cmi + 200 extra they know this . However they still threatening me with eviction . And demanding more income and expenditure so I will send that in to them and see where we go as they will probably demand more again .as the income is now higher . But they are only having the extra £200 as inline with the court order . Regards Markez  
    • do you not still have your ID card etc etc. if its whom I think it is and you are thinking of switching 'sides' shall we say .....you are not alone!!   dx
  • Our picks

    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 3 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
caro

Penalties for not paying by direct debit

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1619 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Can the late payment charge be challenged. BT want £7.50 if you don`t pay within ten days of the bill, that seems a bit of a tight deadline if your post is delayed or you are on holiday for instance.


Won....:D:D:D...£3778.50

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can the late payment charge be challenged. BT want £7.50 if you don`t pay within ten days of the bill, that seems a bit of a tight deadline if your post is delayed or you are on holiday for instance.

 

Given that many judgements are based upon people being "reasonable" about things, I would argue that 10 days (especially when you can lose some of those days by delaying the sending of the bill) is a little unreasonable.


Abbey - Won DPA Claim - Aug 06 and got bailiffs in to recover my court costs of just £30.00

Abbey - Won Charges Refund of £1050 - Nov 06

Egg - Recovered £220 due to Customer Services misinformation - Feb 2007

Nat West - Prelinimary Letter to recover on Credit Card charges £30.00 sent March 2006. £25.40 offered - rejected and the bank reckons that this is it's last word on the matter. We'll see if that's still the case when it reads my N1 form sent recently. It has until the 17th April to respond or the N1 will be submitted.

 

Please check out my web site www.BankChargesScandal.co.uk for Research, Useful links and my story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's an idea.

 

If we refuse to pay BT these extra charges, what will it do?

 

I would suggest that if it cuts you off if you pay the bill minus these charges it will be acting unreasonably as you've paid the bill for the service provided.

 

Views?


Abbey - Won DPA Claim - Aug 06 and got bailiffs in to recover my court costs of just £30.00

Abbey - Won Charges Refund of £1050 - Nov 06

Egg - Recovered £220 due to Customer Services misinformation - Feb 2007

Nat West - Prelinimary Letter to recover on Credit Card charges £30.00 sent March 2006. £25.40 offered - rejected and the bank reckons that this is it's last word on the matter. We'll see if that's still the case when it reads my N1 form sent recently. It has until the 17th April to respond or the N1 will be submitted.

 

Please check out my web site www.BankChargesScandal.co.uk for Research, Useful links and my story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BT wouldn`t isolate the charges, they would claim you still owed them as part of your bill.


Won....:D:D:D...£3778.50

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

I am sure those of you that were with NTL, before it being taken over by Virgin Media, have noticed that the NON DIRECT DEBIT CHARGE has now become the PAYMENT HANDLING CHARGE.

 

So I am to take it that they are charging me for just paying my bill.

 

Can I write to them and say that I'm going to charge them £*.** evry time I pay my bill ?;)


lazybones :D

 

All opinions expressed by me are my own personal ones........

If in doubt seek Professional Advice

__________________________

 

MBNA....... S.A.R....Posted..12/3/07

Delivered..13/3/07..Replied..20/4/07-- Incmplete

Non-compliance letter sent...01/05/07

LTSB........S.A.R. ..Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..20/3/07..Replied..21/4/07--Incoplete

Non-compliance letter sent...07/05/07

AL+LE...... S.A.R... Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..15/3/07..Replied..20/4/07--Complete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i sent off my letter to vodaphone about non dd fees a month ago and still no reply and now this months bills due (again with the fee)

any sugestions as to the next step plz?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BT wouldn`t isolate the charges, they would claim you still owed them as part of your bill.

 

Ah, but if you disputed the charge, that would be a different story, surely?


Abbey - Won DPA Claim - Aug 06 and got bailiffs in to recover my court costs of just £30.00

Abbey - Won Charges Refund of £1050 - Nov 06

Egg - Recovered £220 due to Customer Services misinformation - Feb 2007

Nat West - Prelinimary Letter to recover on Credit Card charges £30.00 sent March 2006. £25.40 offered - rejected and the bank reckons that this is it's last word on the matter. We'll see if that's still the case when it reads my N1 form sent recently. It has until the 17th April to respond or the N1 will be submitted.

 

Please check out my web site www.BankChargesScandal.co.uk for Research, Useful links and my story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been with three a number of years now - actually since they started and i have never paid by DD. Recently i have noticed that on the bills it shows a "payment method administration charge" of £2.553 + VAT which comes to around £3...is this fair just because i choose not to pay by DD because im a student and i dont want to pay charges just incase a DD bounces. can i recover these costs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ah, but if you disputed the charge, that would be a different story, surely?

 

£28 service charge?? or line rental as they used to call it, what exactly do they do with that??

bill arrived today, £5 late payment and £4.50 payment processing charge.

i'm with you, i will be deducting these costs from the amount i pay.

what they gonna do??!!

they monopolise the industry then bombard us with sneaky unlawful extra costs,

STUFF EM!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found an one off charges on our bt bill of £4.46 earlier after talk of this penality charge on another forum. I went and check our bill which I didnt check throughly last week and dads already paid it.

 

Well been searching the web for answers and remember this forum :grin: ... read all thru this thread just.

 

so has anyone else got any other response? Btw has anyone contacted Oftel?

 

This is just so wrong, blimming daylight robbery :mad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just recieved my BT phone bill £162.51 ,I only rent the line :o

 

part of the bill is payment charges £110.87 I have just phoned to query the whole bill ,seen as it should only be £11 ,and have been told the payment charges are because I do not pay by DD :o someones obviously got carried away somewhere :D

seen as I pay monthly by S/O (last payment recieved by them 8th May) I am just about to write a strong letter to both get the bill corrected and inform them I will not be paying their penalty charge and asking them to justify how my payment method costs them any more then a customer who pays by DD :rolleyes:

 

I did originally phone but I felt sorry for the poor girl


When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I presume I can send this letter to Sky who charge £4 for not paying by DD?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had numerous e mails to and fro BT questioning the fairness of the non DD charge and the fact that I should be able to choose how to pay and do so online within 2 or 3 days of bill arriving (I cannot be classed as a late payer).

 

After getting standard template e mails back with them trying to justify the charge I told them I would pay the bill minus the charge. Initially they said they then pursue the outstanding balance through usual debt collection process but I stuck to my guns and they rang me to say they would refund the charge and this would be "for life". I wonder whether I may have to do this every three months but hope not to.

 

The moral is "stick to your guns and keep on trying" - e mails are a pretty cheap way of corresponding too!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There was an item on Watchdog on Monday about phone and utility companies charging customers extra if they don't pay by direct debit.

 

Clearly this is a penalty, which as we all know is not on. BBC Watchdog have produced a template to write to the companies involved, including addresses, which is shown below. There is also a link to the item on the BBC website for those who want to see it there.

 

CAG would like to acknowledge and thank BBC Watchdog for producing this useful template.

 

 

 

BBC - Consumer - TV and radio - Penalty charges

 

I received my BT bill on Thursday 07 June from BT. They expected me to pay this by 10 June!

 

I have not made any calls from my BT line as I have I have not made any calls from my BT line as I have Orange Broadband, and all calls are by mobile.

 

They charged for a late payment (Which it was not) and a £4.00 'Processing Fee'

 

I called them and told them that firstly, it is inappropriate to expect me to pay this within three days of receiving the bill, especially as the payment for line rental is IN ADVANCE and that most businesses have 30, 60 or even 90 days or more to pay their bills and asked if BT paid their suppliers within three days of receiving the bill! This met with a confused babble, followed by silence!

 

I then said that I was willing to pay the bill there and then if they dropped the late fee and the 'Processing Fee'.

 

They said that they would drop the Late Fee, but not the processing fee. I then said that I would send a strong complaint and refuse to pay the bill unless this 'Processing fee' was dropped.

 

They said that they would note that I had entered a complaint.

I felt rather sorry for the female that I was speaking to, as she was a very nice Irish lady . (edit)

 

I then called the Post Office and arranged to have my number transferred to them, which will take 16-21days

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But the Post Office do exacly the same thing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an outrage.

 

I have had anew line installed recently and they got the billing address wrong so I never got the bill, but I did receive the red reminder with the wrong address.

 

I have spent hours after hour (no joking) on the phone trying to get through as they have restricted my service. The last queue was 1hour 26 mins and then they said helpdesk closed and cut me off.

 

They are charging me a late fee and a processing fee for a bill I do not have and the bill actually is advanced line rental (3 months) when the service is currently restricted. I have now e-mailed them.

 

My next step is to send a recorded delivery to them asking for reimbursement of my costs (postage), removal of the late fee and penalty charge, reimbursement for the advanced line rental whilst service restricted and to send me correctly addressed bill.

 

I will give them 7 days to refund anc correct or issue a County Court Summons against them.

 

The attitude of these corporations!

 

Any advice from the CAG most welcome.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i would point out that these charges have been placed because of THEIR administration error and it is unfair for you to pay these charges because THEY not YOU made the mistake.

  • Haha 1

Me Vs AA/Blair Oliver - Defaulted on CCA, Committed Criminal Offence, started chasing payment

 

Me Vs Great Universal - Wrote off the 2k balance, couldnt supply docs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/74209-me-littlewoods-catalogue.html

 

My Friend Vs Lowell Portfolio - Balance written off, all action stopped!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75075-my-friend-lowell-victory.html

 

My Friend Vs Empire Catalogue - Balance Cleared

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75713-my-friend-empire-droyds.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is the phone company? If BT, their online service is quite impressive and you can see the data they hold about you. Once registered with your Customer Number you do get a fast track to CS and billing issues - like the wrong address - can be dealt with quickly.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've recived exactly the same letter to my complaint letter. I'm thinking send them a LBA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for the advice so far.

 

Yes the line is BT.:(

 

I went on-line and set up the account hoping to be able to pay the bill. I went through the process and they sent me an error message. :(

 

I used their on-line "ask emma" which was no use.:(

 

But I did have fun asking if she was a stupid ****! and I did get an answer, which was more interactive than my genuine question.:)

 

I cannot pay my bill for trying!!! I sent them an e-mail via their www and I am still waiting for a reply:(

 

To add insult to injury their bill is only for the advance line rental (3 Mths) and they want to charge me £4.50 cheque fee and probably the £7.50 late fee as well.

 

BT = S****!!!!! IMHO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just had my first bill from BT with the £4.50 charge so l will be paying the bill minus £4.50 of course! Hope they get in touch so l can ask them once again how they justify this penalty charge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So how do we find out if the Trading Standards Institute have indeed pronounced on this and what they said exactly?

 

Also, never been entirely sure of what benefit I gain from the Direct Debit Guarantee?

 

Any thoughts?

 

 

Had exactly the same letter, do we know if what Orange are saying about Trading Standards in correct?


Barclays Bank - SETTLED - £4225.00

First National - SETTLED - £125.00

Lloyds TSB - SETTLED - £994.87

Capital 1 - SETTLED - £827.95

Online Finance - SETTLED - £349.60

Argos - SETTLED - £121.00

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If BT insist on these charges, would it be right to make them earn their money?? For example, how about paying a £80 bill with 80 £1 cheques??

 

It would be a pain to do, but very satisfying IMO!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think BT are feeding all of us a lot of BS.

From their standard reply

We have introduced these changes because it costs more to accept non-Direct Debit payments from customers. This is not just because of the cost of taking the payments, but because on average customers are more likely to forget to pay or not pay, and this leaves us with bad debt of around £100 million a year.

"Bad debt" is a term applied to a debt where there is little or no realistic chance of that money being recovered.

 

BT has an ongoing agreement with Ofcom and the EU Commision to levy a "bad debt surcharge" on it's paying customers to cover that bad dept. The water companies have the same agreement.

also

If you pay monthly you are charged a £1.50 "processing" fee for each bill.

If you pay quarterly you are charged a £4.50 "processing" fee for each bill.

 

That shows the ammount charged has no relationship to BT's cost of "processing" the bill.

It's a rolling punitive charge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so have the trading standards said that this fee is legal?????


Barclays Bank - SETTLED - £4225.00

First National - SETTLED - £125.00

Lloyds TSB - SETTLED - £994.87

Capital 1 - SETTLED - £827.95

Online Finance - SETTLED - £349.60

Argos - SETTLED - £121.00

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...