Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Penalties for not paying by direct debit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3410 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

From what I can tell by the OfCom notes to date (what a way to spend a Sunday afternoon!) - as long as the company put the charges in writing, clear to understand, they can add on what the heck they like?

 

Yes, that is correct. You are always free to pick a supplier who doesn't rip you off like this, that said, I bought a new mobile recently - don't really like contracts for things like mobiles, but did look at them and it appears that just about all the networks only accept payment by direct debit anyway.

 

What's even more sneaky is the newer practice of the customer being forced into two contracts - one with MySupplier and the other with My Supplier Payments Processing Services Limited or similar.

 

This, I would have thought, would pave the way for the payments processing fee to, say, treble, inside a contract with MySupplier, but because MySupplier hasn't changed their terms to disadvantage you, you have no rights at all to cancel with MySupplier and are stuck with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Replies 306
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have a second phone, for my voluntary work, very similar tariff but a business account. No non-DD charge there. It's actually cheaper.

Perhaps the answer is to have a business account :-)

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

 

Me vs Rockwell/Tessara/RBofS: pending.

Me vs MBNA/1st Crud: Discontinued.

First Direct Overdraft: CCJ won.

IR: 2 CCJs 1 won.

Birmingham Midshires: pending

BT: pending

others to come....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Need help please regarding virgin media and there bill charges. Like most people i am unemployed so dont pay by dd this costs me £5 amonth also £1.25 paper bill but what is really hurting because i cross over into other months they are hitting me with another £10 charge each month i have to juggle my money to pay peter then paul any help please regarding these charges mainly the late charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to wave a magic wand, however VM have establioshed these charges over the last 2 years (and don't make any secret that they exist), so the opions are; (1) Pay the charges (2) Negotiate to bring them down to a more manageable level (3) Take your custom elsewhere, and let them know the reason why.

 

For the record, as NTL they made a total mess of my finances so I withdrew their right to take money from my account as they had broken any trust I could reasonable expect to give them. As such, I retain control of my finances, and have no wish to relinquish this to a third party. For over 2 years they would (on request) provide a 'goodwill credit' which covered the amount they charged for not letting them control my bank account. When this stopped, I kept a note of the additional money I was paying until it reached £60. I then advised that as I was paying them almost £800pa, I had had enough and wanted my £60 back as it was disproportionate, I also said if we did not reach a resolution, I would take htem to court for the £60, and terminate my services, giving due notice.

 

Within 2 weeks I had a response. A credit for the £60, and the creation of a 'special discount' which would keep the non-DD fee to £1.50pm. This was clever, as it meant I would probably be unsuccessful should I challenge them in court over the fee. £60pa would easily be seen to be unreasonable, but £18...? Success would not be easily assured. So, it IS possible to get the DD Fee down to £1.50 per month, but it has to be negotiated.

 

As to your last point - the 'late fee'. You can switch to ebilling and save on the cost of paper bills, because they use UK Mail, paper bills usually arrived about 3 days before the payment needed to be credited to the account. With ebilling I get them 1 day after the bill is generated, and have a full 3 weeks to pay. The secret is to ensure your monthly bill is paid in full BEFORE the next one is printed. If you do not, the Late Fee will be applied. If your bill is printed on (say) the 15th of each month, then your funds MUST be with them by 13th, and by this I mean IN their bank account - you can usually do this via PC Banking/BACS under your control, but if you use any third-part service (like PayPoint, Cheque or Debit card) you cannot leave it as late as this - the 5th would be your target date.

 

The dates will never change, so you need to put a ring round the calendar to ensure this bill is paid on time, as it will cost you dearly if it will not.

 

TIP: IF you have not missed a payment in 12 months, CD staff can arrange for a crediting of the £10 fee, but if there is a string of late payments, they will not do it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
I am in receipt of a letter from BT (yesterday) that's in response to a complaint I made on the 19th March about BT's proposed penalty if you don't pay by direct debit.

 

Has anyone else had this letter? I assume it's a standard one.

 

 

 

What's most annoying is that Gillian Lewis couldn't even be bothered to sign the letter herself - it's PPed from someone else. What's worse than that is that it's a scanned signature! Jeeeeez, why can't they scan Ms Lewis' signature?

 

haha see what i mean someones already being paid to process your payment so why should we have to pay extra for that ?

 

BT are the biggest cash whores going they wanted to charge me £130 for a call out because what ever the problem was, was not there problem

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

People say that BT are bad, lol you should see THree :D They are worse! When I first started with them 3 years ago on a £10 a month contract, I was being charged £4.50 non-dd admin :-/

 

Back to the topic of BT and non-DD charges, I'd personally just email the CEO' email address as it's still passed onto the CEO's exec team to deal with... Here are the details and exec teams details:

 

 

Michael Rake Chairman

 

E-mail [email protected]

Telephone 0207 356 5000

Company Twitter @bthelp

 

and

 

I'm sure this is the acting CEO:

 

Ian Livingston Chief Executive

 

E-mail [email protected]

Telephone 0207 356 5000

Fax 0207 356 6650

Website http://www.bt.com

Company Twitter @BTCare

 

I'd personally consider CCing your local news desks tipoff email address when you do :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Noone has posted on thuis thread for a few years

 

is it still the case where companies are not allowed to over charge for non-payment by direct debit?

 

Vodafone charge me about £3 a month for not paying my direct debit, i think it's pretty unreasonable but they think otherwise.

 

Tried to download the letter someone posted up but the link has now gone dead

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...