Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ive already CAREFULLY explained how it all works earlier. what you will have to pay is already preset and detailed on the court forms/TfL stuff you already have. you wont be asked any questions upon your financial means etc. thats not under debate . you wont be asked upon any mitigating circumstances, you have pleaded guity which you always SHOULD.  the ONLY 2 reasons you are attending is to: 1) after finding the TfL prosecutor... plead directly face to face before you go in to try and get an OOC (you can bring up or say anything/everything you like ...anything that might get them to agree) 2) if 1 fails...show your genuine remorse face to face to the magistrate, BRIEFLY mention how a criminal record would hinder your future then hope they take pity on you and dont also record this on your file.  PS its only declarable/shows there for one year anyway. regardless to what an employer might ask in job questionnaires past 1yrs you forget about it. they cannot see it even on enhanced DBS etc etc. you should not latterly ever appeal a criminal record for this type (1yrs)  of 'offence' its not worth it and if you lose said appeal it will cost your dear in terms of additional wages grabbing and court fees. and extends the time it shows if you lose too. dx  
    • hit letter of claim follow post 2 despite repeated requests, the claimant has failed to produce any enforceable paperwork.
    • FTMDave - your cold light of day suspicions are correct, alas. Just had this back... Thank you for your email. I was very sorry to learn that you recently received a parking charge notice after shopping at our Kearsley Manchester Rd Express store. I appreciate this is always frustrating, especially as you'd just nipped in for the one item. I've had a look, and I can confirm that in this case the car park at this store is entirely owned by a third party - it is not owned or operated by Tesco in any way. The parking charge issued is on behalf of that third party, although I appreciate it does state Tesco on the letter. Regrettably as the car park is owned and operated by a separate company we don't have any form of influence or control over the parking charges issued. In this case, I can only recommend that you follow the appeals process outlined on the letter directly to take the matter up with UKPPO directly. I'm sorry that I cannot offer further help in this case.  Please do not hesitate to contact me again should you require anything further.  Kind regards Ewan Kelly Customer Service Specialist On behalf of the Chief Executive’s Office
    • The IMF estimates Russia's economy will grow faster than the likes of the US, UK and Germany this year.View the full article
    • Ye thats fine. They should come back before the date of your defence BUT   IN ANY CASE YOU MUST FILE YOUR DEFENCE. DO NOT AWAIT THE PAPERWORK PAST YOUR FILING DATE.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Penalties for not paying by direct debit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3410 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes they have, I asked Orange about it and they referred me to a statement the Trading Standards Institute made to Watchdog when they ran their story about these charges:

 

BBC - Consumer - TV and radio - Penalty charges

 

The Trading Standards Institute offered a statement regarding this story. It said:

 

"Trading Standards officers have received a number of complaints regarding the extra charge levied by some companies on consumers who pay other than by direct debit.

"These charges are lawful. The Price Indications (Method of Payment) Regulations 1991 allow differential pricing provided the indication of the higher price is expressed clearly, unambiguously, and that it's easily identifiable by a consumer as applying to the goods, services, accommodation or facilities concerned, and given prominently and legibly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 306
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

However, it is worth noting that the Irish Government has enacted legislation PREVENTING firms from charging differing amounts depending on the method of payment used. Which makes you think, if the Irish can see that it is unfair and have actually done something about it, our TS should be campaigning for a similar outcome, not simply saying 'it's legal', and leaving it at that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This may be covered elsewhere, but another company charging £3-£4 per month if you don't pay by DD is SKY TV.

jaxads

 

Halifax - £2281, successfully refunded all charges after LBA letter & telephone call.

Have been offered the difference between the £20 and £12 charges from Capital One -- am sending LBA for remainder.

GE Money - Received settlement of £441, being total charges requested. No interest though.

CCA'd Bank of Scotland / Blair Oliver Scott to produce CCA Agreements on two Credit Cards - well in default, although still chasing payment!!!

EOS Solutions "ceased action on account" on behalf of a friend.

 

All in all, quite busy at the moment and enjoying every minute of it
:eek:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So we can't argue this point then. They are charging us for paying a bill on time, and its LEGAL!?

Barclays Bank - SETTLED - £4225.00

First National - SETTLED - £125.00

Lloyds TSB - SETTLED - £994.87

Capital 1 - SETTLED - £827.95

Online Finance - SETTLED - £349.60

Argos - SETTLED - £121.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

it appears there is nothing we can do.

Me Vs AA/Blair Oliver - Defaulted on CCA, Committed Criminal Offence, started chasing payment

 

Me Vs Great Universal - Wrote off the 2k balance, couldnt supply docs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/74209-me-littlewoods-catalogue.html

 

My Friend Vs Lowell Portfolio - Balance written off, all action stopped!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75075-my-friend-lowell-victory.html

 

My Friend Vs Empire Catalogue - Balance Cleared

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75713-my-friend-empire-droyds.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they have, I asked Orange about it and they referred me to a statement the Trading Standards Institute made to Watchdog when they ran their story about these charges:

 

BBC - Consumer - TV and radio - Penalty charges

 

The Trading Standards Institute offered a statement regarding this story. It said:

 

"Trading Standards officers have received a number of complaints regarding the extra charge levied by some companies on consumers who pay other than by direct debit.

 

"These charges are lawful. The Price Indications (Method of Payment) Regulations 1991 allow differential pricing provided the indication of the higher price is expressed clearly, unambiguously, and that it's easily identifiable by a consumer as applying to the goods, services, accommodation or facilities concerned, and given prominently and legibly.

 

With respect to that last paragraph: I once had an Orange mobile on a contract for years, and thanks to a spate of cock-ups with direct debit I embarked upon cancelling all direct debits and paying by BACS instead which I still do to this day.

 

They then charged a £4 'fee' and I looked closely at their website - both the service plan pages for the plan I had - and the 'general terms and conditions' and could find no mention whatsoever of any additional charge.

 

The pages clearly state the monthly cost of the plan but do not state anywhere that the price is only for about 60% of their customers who pay by direct debit (source: BACS website, 2/3 of people pay this way).

 

Therefore, I'd say this approach - quoting a price that only 60% of people will actually pay - fails the test in that last paragraph, and this is something many companies still do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without meaning to shoot you down in flames I had a similar thought and researched it:

 

Straight from Orange's contract terms.

Orange's Pay Monthly Terms and Conditions

1 Definitions

 

Price Guide: a list of our current Charges which is updated from time to time and is available from us upon request.

Charges: all charges for Services, as published in our periodically updated Price Guide. These include any reasonable administration charges.

6.3 payment methods

6.3.1 we reserve the right to charge an administration fee each month for payments not made by direct debit

 

 

Pay Monthly Price Guide

 

The charges also seem to be clearly referred to on several pages of Orange's Price Guide and they are also clear on my bill, I doubt it is arguable on the basis that the charges are not clear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, I still have my original Orange service contract (long before 'Pay monthly' was coined, and I have not specifically agreed to those changes. I have never had a new phone from them since 1996 and whilst they can assert I'm covered by the revised T&C's I've never been formally advised of them.

 

Of course, all we need is to follow the Irish Route where this type of charging is outlawed, then it'll fall under the UTCC remit and we'll all be happy!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking for BT Late Payment Charges Forum, (can't find) so I'll HiJack here until directed.

 

Are BT allowed to charge £7.50 late payment fee is this not just like the Banks. Answers please.....

 

Beetlejuice.

 

:roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would challenged it. Its a penalty charge.

Barclays Bank - SETTLED - £4225.00

First National - SETTLED - £125.00

Lloyds TSB - SETTLED - £994.87

Capital 1 - SETTLED - £827.95

Online Finance - SETTLED - £349.60

Argos - SETTLED - £121.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys I have written a strongly worded letter re charging for non-direct debit payers.

 

I will let you know what they say!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

A family member has had their £4.50 refunded by BT - on the grounds that he hasn't been notified, in writing, of the change in Terms & Conditions.

 

I however, have tried the same approach & had the reply:

"With regards to your e-mail, I do apologise for the inconvenience that unfortunately we would not be able to refund £4.50. However, if you set up direct debit on your account, this amount would be credited on your next bill."

 

Also, I have noticed that my business bill from BT doesn't include an additional charge for paying by cheque... why is this??

Link to post
Share on other sites

After email back and forth to BT this is their latest one .:rolleyes:

 

FWI I pay by Standing Order and am never late paying .

Thank you for your e-mail dated xxxxx regarding payment processing fees.

 

Please accept my apologies for the delay in replying to you.

 

With regards to your e-mail, I am writing in response to your recent approach to BT about concerns relating to payment processing fees. I am also very sorry that you have had to make repeated contacts to have your concern resolved.

 

In response to your e-mail, I would like to inform you that from May 1st, we have reduced the price of monthly line rental by £1.00 and, broadband by £1.00 if you don’t pay by Direct Debit. At the same time, a separate payment processing fee of £1.50 a month is introduced. This is not a penalty charge but a separate fee for methods of payment which cost us more to process. So the net effect is only 50p a month more for anyone who just has a phone line with us, but anyone who takes broadband as well will be 50p a month better off.

 

BT's fee for non-Direct Debit payments is amongst the lowest around. For example, Virgin Media charge £5 a month. Many companies, such as Car phone Warehouse, will only accept customers who agree to pay by Direct Debit.

 

I also want to reassure you that the fee will not apply to customers on BT’s special rates for low income and vulnerable customers, such as In Contact Plus, the Light User Scheme, and Pay & Call.

 

The payment processing fee has been introduced because some methods of payment are costly to process. But it’s not just about the cost of taking the payments; following up when customers forget to pay on time does involve spending time and money.

 

By calculating the cost we apply a general policy for all payment methods that are not automated, i.e. other then Direct Debit or Monthly Payment Plan to reflect the higher risk of non-payment as well as the higher costs involved.

 

At BT, we are committed to offering our customers a wide choice of ways to pay their bills. Whilst we encourage choice of payment, it is worth pointing out that Direct Debit has benefits for customers. It saves time and is convenient. It means that your BT bill is one less thing to worry about.

 

If you choose to pay by Direct Debit, we try to give you up to ten days from the time of receiving the bill before processing the Direct Debit payment giving you plenty of time to ask questions, and we tell you on the bill when the amount will be taken from your

account. There is also a Direct Debit Guarantee which protects you and your money. If any error is made by BT or your bank or building society, you are guaranteed a full and immediate refund from your branch of the amount paid.

 

We will waive the non-Direct Debit fee if you choose to switch to Direct Debit or Monthly Payment Plan after receiving your first bill after May 1st.

 

Further, the fee is not transaction-based, as this would unfairly disadvantage those who need to pay in several small instalments. Instead the costs are averaged on a monthly/quarterly basis across all customers using non-automated methods of payment.

 

If you still decide not to pay the payment processing fee, we will apply our standard debt collection process. BT will not be changing its policy.

 

Please be assured whatever means you use to contact me, you can be confident that your concerns will be dealt with sensitively and professionally and in accordance with approved procedures

 

I trust, therefore, that the contents of this letter will go a long way in providing you with the reassurance that you understandably seek and provide you with the clarification needed. If you should have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact us again via e-mail.

 

Thank you for contacting BT, we value your association with us.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

(name)

eContact Customer Service

 

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, I have noticed that my business bill from BT doesn't include an additional charge for paying by cheque... why is this??

 

Because it doesn't apply to Business Lines - only Residential. Why? Because firms would tall them to take a hike and go elsewhere....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Janet-M - I've had exactly the same email from them. I also pay on-time and found the line "If you still decide not to pay the payment processing fee, we will apply our standard debt collection process." threatening!

 

buzby - I wonder how much the line rental would be for a business line would be to my home address? I might make a few enquiries....

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the details are on their website. The main difference is that you get a free Classified Directory entry, and a higher priority in fault repairs - usually same day, or next-day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent numerous e mails and got the standard stuff as posted elsewhere on here. I counteracted by saying i dont care what virgin etc charge I just say it is unfair when I pay as soon as bill arrives. I then paid the bill minus the additional charge and eventually got a call from BT to discuss the charge etc and they said the £4.50 would not be added etc and this would be for ever but I expect that I may have to do the same process every 13 weeks. I just e mail and e mail as it is totally free and doesnt take time getting through call centres etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies - hit enter in error

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having just received my phone bill I am angry about the £4.50 non DD charge. Interestingly though I have also received a letter from my local council trying to get me to pay my Council Tax by DD rather than online as I do at present. The letter says that it is more cost efficient for the council as DD payments only cost them 8p to collect but cash or cheque payments cost 45p (surely online debit card payments are almost as cheap as DD?).

 

How do BT equate the cost to £4.50?

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

by the way paid my bill on 12th July have not heard a peep yet maybe Debt Collector gonna turn up on my doorstep wanting to know how l'm gonna pay this £4.50 l owe!!

 

That's because it'll be shown as an underpayment oin your next bill. Since the bill wasn't paid in full, the Late Payment Charge will also be applied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but hten you can reclaim the late payment charges as they are penalty charges.

Me Vs AA/Blair Oliver - Defaulted on CCA, Committed Criminal Offence, started chasing payment

 

Me Vs Great Universal - Wrote off the 2k balance, couldnt supply docs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/74209-me-littlewoods-catalogue.html

 

My Friend Vs Lowell Portfolio - Balance written off, all action stopped!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75075-my-friend-lowell-victory.html

 

My Friend Vs Empire Catalogue - Balance Cleared

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75713-my-friend-empire-droyds.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...