Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 7. In March the WHO recommended all countries launch a Track and Trace app 8. Apple and Google developed one and made it freely available to any country. Dozens of countries use it without any issues 9. But the UK decided to build its own “world beating system” 10. Apple and Google said the UK’s approach was impossible 11. 300 app and technology experts condemned the UK plans 12. But the govt ignored that, put the wife of a Tory MP in charge and gave her £11m, almost 3x the average budget for any Track and Trace app worldwide 13. The UK app planned to collect your data, which could be sold to any private business for 20 years 14. The govt promised the App by mid-April 15. Then the govt promised it by Jun 1 16. Then the govt promised it by Sept 17. Then the govt promised it “for the winter” 18. Then it was revealed the govt had asked Apple for access to their proprietary code, to which Apple said no, because the app breached international privacy laws 19. Then the WHO said lock-down measures should not be relaxed until Track and Trace were in place 20. But the UK govt replied that manual track and trace would work fine 21. And then it was revealed the UK's manual track and trace service missed between 30% and 80% of contacts 22. After a trial of the App, a report showed it worked just 4% of the time on Apple devices and missed 25% of connections on Android 23. And then, finally, the govt announced it was abandoning its “world beating system” 24. Matt Hancock said he had long been aware of “technical blocks” in the UK app 25. Then Matt Hancock said we had long been working on both Apps, but didn’t explain why we only tested the one he "knew wouldn’t work" on the Isle of White 26. Matt Hancock said he would now create a “hybrid system”, and had spoken to Apple about it 27. Apple and Google said nobody had spoken to them, and it was still impossible 28. It was reported the UK app developers had tried to block rival apps, and called them “the enemy” 29. It was reported the scripts given to manual contract tracers didn't even match the app 30. MIT Technology Review described the UK’s contact tracing and app development as a "fiasco" and “a masterclass in mismanagement”       https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussion/2383363/theweekintory-keeping-tabs
    • As not english person I'm finding it really difficult to deal with all this. . I'm not even sure what SAR is and where to send it.  When I asked lloyds to start investigation about irresponsible lending (all done over the phone nearly 4 weeks ago) they've gave me ref number but didn't hear anything back. They've sent me a letter about overdraft that it has all fees and interest stopped and default will go on this account for 6 years and that the collection department will contact me.  How can I start an investigation about irresponsible landing the right way?  Please advise and thank you
    • Hi BankFodder,   Just a quick update:   Parcelhero have been in contact with me each day, they've been trying unsuccessfully to get hold of Hermes, so after a week we've moved to the claims process. The chap who's helped me through it has been good, so I've not had to ask any questions here etc.   I've submitted my claim, and I'll let you know what happens as a result of that.   Wanted to extend a thanks your way once again, the conversation put me at considerable ease.    
    • The agreement was for 18,000 miles per annum, I had the car 31 months. Someone has done some handwritten 'calculations' on one of the enclosed sheets, which says "mileage allow = 46,500" "1,500 x 31months". And on another sheet it has "Actual mileage 51,607, Excess: 5107 miles", which could give this figure of 46,500 (as the mileage on collection day was 51,607), but I can't understand where this 46,500 actually comes from, or am I missing something here? 🤔   So Ford can just come up with spurious charges, put defaults on my credit file, sell on the non-existent debt, and just walk away, leaving me to spend hours sorting it out?   Am I to just ignore Link forever more, or will they eventually just stop bothering me?
    • Hi I am afraid you have been misled initially.   The Compliance fee, is due from when the warrant is received by the bailiff, not from when the notice is sent. As you quite rightly say it is to cover expenses which may include searches etc, these would have to e done before the NOE was posted to you. Stages of enforcement for which fees may be recovered – enforcement other than under High Court writs 5.—(1) The relevant stages of enforcement under an enforcement power which is not conferred by a High Court writ are as follows— (a)the compliance stage, which comprises all activities relating to enforcement from the receipt by the enforcement agent of instructions to use that procedure in relation to a sum to be recovered up to but not including the commencement of the enforcement stage;   Payment to the court is always a bad idea once the debt has been transferred to enforcement, as it slows down the procedure, as the sum will not be paid until confirmation is sent from the court to the EA. You are not the first to fall for this "advice".   Just to add to the above.   The bailiff collects both fees and the sum due to the court in one sum, "the amount outstanding" as far as they are concerned there is just a £75 shortfall.   If you ring and say you have been misled, they may intercede and help. But it is your fault, so apologetic is the operative word here.  Sorry about the multiple posts. See, like that 
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

going to court soon


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4900 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Just a quick update.

 

Had not heard anything from the courts since i filed papers so i gave them a call today and they informed me that my papers have been deemed served on the 31st March so Barclays now have 14 days to submit defence, lady on phone said that the 14 days includes weekends and the easter bank holiday - was plesently suprised about the weekends but find it hard to believe about the bank holiday - so either way i will check again on 16/4/07 with the court for an update if i have not heard anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

She's right. Weekends and bank holidays are only excluded if the court requires a response in 5 days or less. As they've 14 days weekends and holidays don't count.

 

By the way they've 14 days to file a defence or to acknowledge the claim. If they acknowledge the claim that gives them 28 days from date of service of the claim to file their defence.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Addy is completely right, this is a pain in our butts,

they can acknowledge the claim on the 14th day which then allows them another 28 to submit their defence, and guess what, they use it too, Grrrr!

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, they can acknowledge the claim on the 14th day which buys them another 14 days, rather than another 28 days, so it's not quite that bad. I've edited my post above as I missed out a couple of words that could cause confusion.

 

Realistically I'd not anticipate a defence to be filed before the last moment, which allowing for the fact that the final day falls on a weekend (although the time is up on the weekend if it arrives on the Monday it's still counted as being there in time), which would be the close of the court on 30th April.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies recieved a letter from court saying the deadline is 16/4/07 as i thought - then if they acknowlege then they have 14 days from date of acknowlegment? have to file a court claim for my second claim for barclays of £210 as mentioned before on Tues. - will keep you posted

Link to post
Share on other sites

then if they acknowlege then they have 14 days from date of acknowlegment?

Depends how early they acknowledge. If they acknowledge on the last possible day they then gain an extra 14 days, if they acknowledge earlier than 14 days they gain proportionately more time to submit a defence.

 

The way it works is they've 14 days from the date the claim is deemed served to acknowledge or file a defence.

 

If they acknowledge within that 14 days they then have 28 days from the date the claim was deemed served to file their defence.

 

There's a subtle difference between saying they've 14 days from acknowledgment to file a defence and saying they've 28 days from service of the claim to file a defence if they've acknowledged the claim but when you're checking every day it's best to be certain.

 

If you've got the notification of issue that the court sent you (I forget its title and form number) it should tell you the date that the claim is deemed served. Add 29 days (calendar not working days) to this to get the latest date for a defence if they've acknowledged (there's a reason for adding 29 days not 28 days - there's sometimes a discrepancy between the dates given by court staff and the actual limits given in law and if there's any doubt the defendant gets the benefit). If that 29th day is a weekend or bank holiday then take the next working day as the last date for them to submit a defence.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update called the court at 4pm and they said they have not reicieved anything from barclays and i can enter Judgment if i want to - which i do and will be doing in the morning. - is it save to say i have won? or could barclays have a last minute twist of the knife (they had untill 16/4/07 to respond) is that 4pm on 16/04/07 i think i might just call tomorrow before i enter judgment.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just a quick update called the court at 4pm and they said they have not reicieved anything from barclays and i can enter Judgment if i want to - which i do and will be doing in the morning. - is it save to say i have won? or could barclays have a last minute twist of the knife (they had untill 16/4/07 to respond) is that 4pm on 16/04/07 i think i might just call tomorrow before i enter judgment.

 

Don't be surprised if the enter late and it is accepted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so i filed judgement today as i called court this morning and Barclays still had not acknowledged the claim so i win by default.

 

The court said they have around 6 days backlog and i will hear something the end of next week and when i do i should contact Barclays to arrange payment.

 

So i guess i won but wont celebrate just yet not untill i get my money, but it does feel good already. lol :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, don't celebrate just yet.

 

Barclays will not just accept a CCJ, they will apply to get it set aside. In some cases, they write and say they will pay asap as long as you don't object to the set-aside, in some cases, they just go straight to court to apply.

Link to post
Share on other sites
whats set-aside?

Part 13

A judgement in default means a judgement entered because a defence or acknowledgemnt has not been filed. It follows that the case will not have been allocated to the SCT and the application is not protected by the 'no costs' rule.

 

The court MUST set aside a judgement in default if:

a) the judgement was entered too soon.

b) if the claimant has obtained judgement after making an application for summary judgement

 

The court has the discretion to set aside a default judgement if:

a) the defendant has a real prospect of successfully defending the claim

b) it appears to the court that there is some other good reason why

[e.g the defendant should be allowed to defend the claim.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

good and bad news

 

good news - my second account for barclays (£210) they wrote me a letter today to say amount is in my account with the usual rubbish about how they were within there rights and that it is a good will guesture - will cancel my court claim monday - am well happy - they must have found the letters? but in the mean time they have charged me twice so might phone them and ask for the £60 to be refunded also? or should i start another claim - do i have to start a claim if i ever get charged again for each individual claim - dont get charged that much anymore?

 

Bad news - for my big claim (£2002.08) i still have not recieved judgement from the court yet, i filed for judgement on 13/4/07 have called the court but all they said is that they are a week behind on claims/judgements? so will have to wait a little longer.

 

But am like a bounty hunter in the mornings for the postman! lol

 

also have started a thread in barclaycard as i wrote them requesting statements they wrote back saying they must have deleted my account information. I had the account 2001 -2004, surely they cannot do this? any advice on what to do next? -( sorry no one replied on the barclaycard thread) they have given me 14 days to reply

Link to post
Share on other sites
good and bad news

 

good news - my second account for barclays (£210) they wrote me a letter today to say amount is in my account with the usual rubbish about how they were within there rights and that it is a good will guesture - will cancel my court claim monday - am well happy - they must have found the letters? but in the mean time they have charged me twice so might phone them and ask for the £60 to be refunded also? or should i start another claim - do i have to start a claim if i ever get charged again for each individual claim - dont get charged that much anymore?

 

Bad news - for my big claim (£2002.08) i still have not recieved judgement from the court yet, i filed for judgement on 13/4/07 have called the court but all they said is that they are a week behind on claims/judgements? so will have to wait a little longer.

 

But am like a bounty hunter in the mornings for the postman! lol

 

also have started a thread in barclaycard as i wrote them requesting statements they wrote back saying they must have deleted my account information. I had the account 2001 -2004, surely they cannot do this? any advice on what to do next? -( sorry no one replied on the barclaycard thread) they have given me 14 days to reply

 

Congrats on the win.

 

With regards to Barclaycard, nothing surprises me with this lot. Complain to the ICO see here: Complaints

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, have contact barclaycard and their complaints team will be in touch in 3 days with an outcome!

 

on an even sadder note BARCLAYS DEFENDED MY CLAIM their deadline was 16/04/2007 and they defended on 26/04/2007 ten days late! phoned the court who said that with the backlog the judge decieded to deal with which ever they came across first my judgement or defence and they came across the banks defence first ( i entered judgement 17/04/2007) i thought this highly unfair and the lady at the court said i could write a letter complaining and the judge will look at it again but it will delay proceedings and that in 100% of cases the banks are settling out of court and that i should just go ahead.

 

So game on

 

so i am now filling in my Allocation questionaire

 

i have recieved barclays defence i take it that it is just a standard thing - even though it does state that claims before 26 march 2001 should be denied - as it is passed the 6 year deadline i dont understand this as i have no claims before 26 march 01 they start October 2001? am i right to believe they are sending the same out to everyone?

 

any tips for the Allocation questionaire i am now reading up on next stage and what to expect

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now finished my allocation questionaire very straight forward form.

 

just for clarification in section G i have put

 

I believe the case will last no longer than an hour

 

Please could i request that the judge order a form of 'basic' disclosure from the bank, this has been attached for consideration and i believe it will bring a speedy end to litigation. This was devised by the Mercantile Courts for a similar case.

 

Is this right - if so i will take into court first thing tomorrow. Does this actually work if the bank does disclose this information, wont this mean more work for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please is there anyone out there who can help with my above post - going to take the questionaire in to court today and would hate to have put the wrong thing in section G!

 

any help appriciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

 

go to the thread that shows the example of the N149 form [second example]

 

hope thats what you wanted..if not get back to me..

 

Daz

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks, yea that is sort of what i wanted - i filled in the questionaire from the advice on thread, only bit i was unsure of was the wording in section G - just wanted to make sure it read right, made sense and said what it was meant to. - once i send the allocation in do i just wait for a response from the court?

 

in section G i have put

 

I believe the case will last no longer than an hour

 

Please could i request that the judge order a form of 'basic' disclosure from the bank, this has been attached for consideration and i believe it will bring a speedy end to litigation. This was devised by the Mercantile Courts for a similar case.

 

 

Can anyone help with the next stage, what do i need to put together for my court bundle?

 

sorry for so many questions dont mean to be a pain

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

just thought i would update you all i have sent in my AQ (hope i filled it in right) now just waiting for a court date i guess any ideas how long i may have to wait untill barclays settle? also the court asked if i would be happy to try mediation i agreed to this as it was advised by the court by making me look willing to co-operate with the bank/court by all means. was this the right thing to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...