Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear PIXeL_92 It has been explained to you in previous correspondence that the roof tiles that are the subject of your complaint, at the time of inspection were heavily covered in moss. It is in your agreed terms that the surveyor will not carry out an asbestos survey and is not required to scrape away moss if the surface below is obscured. The surveyor will carry out only a visual inspection and comment on defects visible at the time of inspection. Roofs can fail at any time particularly in periods of inclement weather. As stated in your report, the surveyor confirmed that the roof was in a satisfactory condition at the time of inspection therefore would not require replacement in the immediate future. The subject building is a utility building and is not a habitable room of the main property. As previously explained, tiles on an outbuilding of this nature would not affect the property value. You state you would have factored in the cost of removal/replacement into the purchase offer however as advised at the time of inspection the tiles were in a satisfactory condition and you have not sought to replace the tiles in the three years following the date of inspection. This confirms the comments provided by the surveyor. You have previously stated that the roof became damaged due to high winds and the roofing specialist you instructed to replace the broken tiles made you aware of the possibility that the tiles may contain asbestos. However, you have not yet had the tiles tested to confirm the presence of asbestos. Our surveyor revisited your property and confirmed that you have had the damaged roof tiles replaced. A roof that contains asbestos will only become a health and safety risk if it is disturbed and it therefore seems odd that the roofing contractor was happy to replace the tiles if in fact asbestos was present. We understand that raising a complaint and progressing to legal action as you have suggested you wish to do can be a lengthy drawn-out and expensive process with no guarantee of success. If necessary, we will notify our legal team to address this matter on our behalf however, we are happy to attempt to settle this matter in advance to avoid prolonged communications and extending this matter for many more months. In an effort to conclude this matter to the satisfaction of all parties, we shall increase our goodwill offer to £500 in full and final settlement of this matter. This offer will be available until Thursday 27 August 2020. There will be no further offers made after this date. I look forward to your response. Yours sincerely, Walker Dunn MRICS
    • Sorry for the text heavy post, we are getting nowhere with them, I need some help deciding our next steps, I have a couple more emails as PDFs that I need to attach below.   Dear PIXel_92, We confirmed in our previous email that our offer would be made available until Friday 14 August 2020. This offer was presented as a gesture of goodwill based on the information you have provided in support of your claim. Thus far, we have not had sight of a Specialist Report confirming the presence of Asbestos or quotations for the required works. Since you have not furnished us with any additional information we are unable to provide any further comments on the matter at this time. If you’re able to provide the requested information we will be happy to review the matter and discuss it further with you. Kind regards, Customer Relations ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** Dear Walker Dunn,   I have on two occasions offered to have it tested further than a visual inspection but if it comes back as asbestos you cover the costs, you asked me for the costs involved in getting it tested and you neither agreed to nor declined to cover that cost if it came back as asbestos, again I am happy to have it tested but if it comes back as asbestos to have those costs covered.   I have sent communication from a roofer on headed paper confirming they belive it to be asbestos but they aren't registered to remove it.   I am happy to get three formal quotes written on paper and provide them, I have spoken to a roofer that deals in asbestos that was here to do another job at the time and he said just going off rough size it would be approximately £2000 to remove the roof and dispose of the asbestos. I will get some quotes over the next week and get back to you with them.   Regards ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** Dear Walker Dunn,   Could I please get confirmation regarding if you are going to cover the cost of testing if it does come back as positive before I go ahead with it.   I now have 3 quotes for removal of the asbestos too.   My solicitors has also forwarded me this to read through, https://www.rics.org/uk/upholding-professional-standards/regulation/how-we-regulate/disciplinary-process/panel-hearings/disciplinary-panel-hearings/walker-dunn-limited-and-colin-walker/.   This will be our next step going to the RICS / property ombudsman as we seem to be getting nowhere and it has been going on for some time due to you not answering the above question.   If you don't answer it we can get it tested and look at legal action to recover the money at a later date if that's how you want to do it.   Regards **************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************  
    • So you did...should have gone to specsavers......so as this debt is in your name only only a restriction type K can be placed on your share of the equity.   You have still not explain why " you dont actually own any equity "...you can PM if you rather this was not divulged on the open topic....as this may be important and possibly stop any interim charge.....subject to your response.
    • unfortunately, under the statute of limitations Act, that has has been around for probably +100yrs, yes.
    • At some point in the video it has screenshots of this forum and the narrative suggests that some people agree that an enforcement agent has the power to enter into a property to check on identity. I think that it is intended that the CAG is associated with this belief. There would be quite wrong and it's a shame that this very interesting and relevant video has tried to express this.
  • Our picks

    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 4 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
       
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
       
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
       
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
       
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
       
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
       
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
       
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .
    • In desperate need of help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/425244-in-desperate-need-of-help/&do=findComment&comment=5067040
      • 29 replies

going to court soon


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4860 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Just a quick update.

 

Had not heard anything from the courts since i filed papers so i gave them a call today and they informed me that my papers have been deemed served on the 31st March so Barclays now have 14 days to submit defence, lady on phone said that the 14 days includes weekends and the easter bank holiday - was plesently suprised about the weekends but find it hard to believe about the bank holiday - so either way i will check again on 16/4/07 with the court for an update if i have not heard anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

She's right. Weekends and bank holidays are only excluded if the court requires a response in 5 days or less. As they've 14 days weekends and holidays don't count.

 

By the way they've 14 days to file a defence or to acknowledge the claim. If they acknowledge the claim that gives them 28 days from date of service of the claim to file their defence.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Addy is completely right, this is a pain in our butts,

they can acknowledge the claim on the 14th day which then allows them another 28 to submit their defence, and guess what, they use it too, Grrrr!

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, they can acknowledge the claim on the 14th day which buys them another 14 days, rather than another 28 days, so it's not quite that bad. I've edited my post above as I missed out a couple of words that could cause confusion.

 

Realistically I'd not anticipate a defence to be filed before the last moment, which allowing for the fact that the final day falls on a weekend (although the time is up on the weekend if it arrives on the Monday it's still counted as being there in time), which would be the close of the court on 30th April.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies recieved a letter from court saying the deadline is 16/4/07 as i thought - then if they acknowlege then they have 14 days from date of acknowlegment? have to file a court claim for my second claim for barclays of £210 as mentioned before on Tues. - will keep you posted

Link to post
Share on other sites

then if they acknowlege then they have 14 days from date of acknowlegment?

Depends how early they acknowledge. If they acknowledge on the last possible day they then gain an extra 14 days, if they acknowledge earlier than 14 days they gain proportionately more time to submit a defence.

 

The way it works is they've 14 days from the date the claim is deemed served to acknowledge or file a defence.

 

If they acknowledge within that 14 days they then have 28 days from the date the claim was deemed served to file their defence.

 

There's a subtle difference between saying they've 14 days from acknowledgment to file a defence and saying they've 28 days from service of the claim to file a defence if they've acknowledged the claim but when you're checking every day it's best to be certain.

 

If you've got the notification of issue that the court sent you (I forget its title and form number) it should tell you the date that the claim is deemed served. Add 29 days (calendar not working days) to this to get the latest date for a defence if they've acknowledged (there's a reason for adding 29 days not 28 days - there's sometimes a discrepancy between the dates given by court staff and the actual limits given in law and if there's any doubt the defendant gets the benefit). If that 29th day is a weekend or bank holiday then take the next working day as the last date for them to submit a defence.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update called the court at 4pm and they said they have not reicieved anything from barclays and i can enter Judgment if i want to - which i do and will be doing in the morning. - is it save to say i have won? or could barclays have a last minute twist of the knife (they had untill 16/4/07 to respond) is that 4pm on 16/04/07 i think i might just call tomorrow before i enter judgment.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just a quick update called the court at 4pm and they said they have not reicieved anything from barclays and i can enter Judgment if i want to - which i do and will be doing in the morning. - is it save to say i have won? or could barclays have a last minute twist of the knife (they had untill 16/4/07 to respond) is that 4pm on 16/04/07 i think i might just call tomorrow before i enter judgment.

 

Don't be surprised if the enter late and it is accepted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so i filed judgement today as i called court this morning and Barclays still had not acknowledged the claim so i win by default.

 

The court said they have around 6 days backlog and i will hear something the end of next week and when i do i should contact Barclays to arrange payment.

 

So i guess i won but wont celebrate just yet not untill i get my money, but it does feel good already. lol :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, don't celebrate just yet.

 

Barclays will not just accept a CCJ, they will apply to get it set aside. In some cases, they write and say they will pay asap as long as you don't object to the set-aside, in some cases, they just go straight to court to apply.

Link to post
Share on other sites
so sorry bookworm, but i didnt understand that whats set-aside?

 

It basically means they will apply to have the judgement set aside. They will prob claim an error of some sort on their part and will state they will pay up if you agree to the set aside.

 

This means they don't get a CCJ against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
whats set-aside?

Part 13

A judgement in default means a judgement entered because a defence or acknowledgemnt has not been filed. It follows that the case will not have been allocated to the SCT and the application is not protected by the 'no costs' rule.

 

The court MUST set aside a judgement in default if:

a) the judgement was entered too soon.

b) if the claimant has obtained judgement after making an application for summary judgement

 

The court has the discretion to set aside a default judgement if:

a) the defendant has a real prospect of successfully defending the claim

b) it appears to the court that there is some other good reason why

[e.g the defendant should be allowed to defend the claim.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

good and bad news

 

good news - my second account for barclays (£210) they wrote me a letter today to say amount is in my account with the usual rubbish about how they were within there rights and that it is a good will guesture - will cancel my court claim monday - am well happy - they must have found the letters? but in the mean time they have charged me twice so might phone them and ask for the £60 to be refunded also? or should i start another claim - do i have to start a claim if i ever get charged again for each individual claim - dont get charged that much anymore?

 

Bad news - for my big claim (£2002.08) i still have not recieved judgement from the court yet, i filed for judgement on 13/4/07 have called the court but all they said is that they are a week behind on claims/judgements? so will have to wait a little longer.

 

But am like a bounty hunter in the mornings for the postman! lol

 

also have started a thread in barclaycard as i wrote them requesting statements they wrote back saying they must have deleted my account information. I had the account 2001 -2004, surely they cannot do this? any advice on what to do next? -( sorry no one replied on the barclaycard thread) they have given me 14 days to reply

Link to post
Share on other sites
good and bad news

 

good news - my second account for barclays (£210) they wrote me a letter today to say amount is in my account with the usual rubbish about how they were within there rights and that it is a good will guesture - will cancel my court claim monday - am well happy - they must have found the letters? but in the mean time they have charged me twice so might phone them and ask for the £60 to be refunded also? or should i start another claim - do i have to start a claim if i ever get charged again for each individual claim - dont get charged that much anymore?

 

Bad news - for my big claim (£2002.08) i still have not recieved judgement from the court yet, i filed for judgement on 13/4/07 have called the court but all they said is that they are a week behind on claims/judgements? so will have to wait a little longer.

 

But am like a bounty hunter in the mornings for the postman! lol

 

also have started a thread in barclaycard as i wrote them requesting statements they wrote back saying they must have deleted my account information. I had the account 2001 -2004, surely they cannot do this? any advice on what to do next? -( sorry no one replied on the barclaycard thread) they have given me 14 days to reply

 

Congrats on the win.

 

With regards to Barclaycard, nothing surprises me with this lot. Complain to the ICO see here: Complaints

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, have contact barclaycard and their complaints team will be in touch in 3 days with an outcome!

 

on an even sadder note BARCLAYS DEFENDED MY CLAIM their deadline was 16/04/2007 and they defended on 26/04/2007 ten days late! phoned the court who said that with the backlog the judge decieded to deal with which ever they came across first my judgement or defence and they came across the banks defence first ( i entered judgement 17/04/2007) i thought this highly unfair and the lady at the court said i could write a letter complaining and the judge will look at it again but it will delay proceedings and that in 100% of cases the banks are settling out of court and that i should just go ahead.

 

So game on

 

so i am now filling in my Allocation questionaire

 

i have recieved barclays defence i take it that it is just a standard thing - even though it does state that claims before 26 march 2001 should be denied - as it is passed the 6 year deadline i dont understand this as i have no claims before 26 march 01 they start October 2001? am i right to believe they are sending the same out to everyone?

 

any tips for the Allocation questionaire i am now reading up on next stage and what to expect

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now finished my allocation questionaire very straight forward form.

 

just for clarification in section G i have put

 

I believe the case will last no longer than an hour

 

Please could i request that the judge order a form of 'basic' disclosure from the bank, this has been attached for consideration and i believe it will bring a speedy end to litigation. This was devised by the Mercantile Courts for a similar case.

 

Is this right - if so i will take into court first thing tomorrow. Does this actually work if the bank does disclose this information, wont this mean more work for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please is there anyone out there who can help with my above post - going to take the questionaire in to court today and would hate to have put the wrong thing in section G!

 

any help appriciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

 

go to the thread that shows the example of the N149 form [second example]

 

hope thats what you wanted..if not get back to me..

 

Daz

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks, yea that is sort of what i wanted - i filled in the questionaire from the advice on thread, only bit i was unsure of was the wording in section G - just wanted to make sure it read right, made sense and said what it was meant to. - once i send the allocation in do i just wait for a response from the court?

 

in section G i have put

 

I believe the case will last no longer than an hour

 

Please could i request that the judge order a form of 'basic' disclosure from the bank, this has been attached for consideration and i believe it will bring a speedy end to litigation. This was devised by the Mercantile Courts for a similar case.

 

 

Can anyone help with the next stage, what do i need to put together for my court bundle?

 

sorry for so many questions dont mean to be a pain

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

just thought i would update you all i have sent in my AQ (hope i filled it in right) now just waiting for a court date i guess any ideas how long i may have to wait untill barclays settle? also the court asked if i would be happy to try mediation i agreed to this as it was advised by the court by making me look willing to co-operate with the bank/court by all means. was this the right thing to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...