Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

luke V virgin


tetley75
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6236 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi i have sucessfully claimed against my banks, so i feel its now time to move onto the cards. I've got a couple of questions which i would appreciate help with.

 

1.... Do i use the exact same template letters that i used for the banks or do i have to modify them in any way?

 

2.....I assume i use the address on the virgin statement for my sar?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You modify anything relating specifically to bank accounts so it's relevant for credit cards, for example the bank prelim refers to unauthorised overdraft fees whereas a credit card prelim would refer to charges for exceeding a credit limit.

 

Not sure about Virgin SAR address.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i'm a bit confused about interest, if i've got this right you claim contractural interest at the start, but do you then claim another 8 % once you do the mcol claim.

 

Hi there, as I understand it, if you get to MCOL stage, you can put 8% in as an alternative if the Judge doesn't allow you to claim contractual. You won't get that far, I am sure....;)

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, as I understand it, if you get to MCOL stage, you can put 8% in as an alternative if the Judge doesn't allow you to claim contractual. You won't get that far, I am sure....;)

 

Thanks mate, so it's one or the other, not both then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mate, so it's one or the other, not both then?

 

Luke, I suspect you won't get to MCOL stage, the way it works is that the interest aspect is at the discretion of the Judge. They sometimes do not agree with the Contractual interest element but they will give you the 8%. At this stage, stick to your claim amount plus contractual.

 

We'll worry about the other aspect should you have to file!

 

Hope that helps and good luck!!:)

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Luke

I have just phoned Virgin for copy statements and was told it is £2.50 per statement!!! I said I want them all sent but will pay no more than £10 for the lot. She said she couldn't send them out unless they charge £2.50. I agreed and explained I will be claiming it all back anyway.

 

What stage are you at? What address did you use?

Thanks and good luck!

Alison

RBS

13/10 - Prelim sent, 19/10 - Sod Off letter recvd, 27/10 - partial offer received, 27/10 - rejection letter sent, 3/11 - SETTLED IN FULL

Cheltenham & Gloucester (ERC's)

21/11 - Prelim sent, 26/11 - sod off letter recved, 2/12 - LBA sent, 10/12 SETTLED IN FULL!!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Luke

I have just phoned Virgin for copy statements and was told it is £2.50 per statement!!! I said I want them all sent but will pay no more than £10 for the lot. She said she couldn't send them out unless they charge £2.50. I agreed and explained I will be claiming it all back anyway.

 

What stage are you at? What address did you use?

Thanks and good luck!

Alison

 

Hi Alison, I am wondering why you are phoning them and agreeing to pay £2.50 per statement when you could just issue a Subject Access Request with your £10.00 fee and ID? You need to know that MBNA are masters at delaying at the moment and they must have loved it if they thought they could charge you that per statement! What they are saying is utter rubbish and I would strongly advise you to issue an SAR with your £10.00 and a form of ID (ie : driving license).

 

You are far better of doing the SAR as they will have to provide you with all information relating to your account. There have been many people on here who have had statements mysteriously "missing out" charges. I wouldn't trust them not to do it.

 

Please take my advice so they don't screw you over!!

 

Regards,

 

Corn :)

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi alison, i couldn't agree more with Cornucopia, £10 is the max you have to pay for all the info they hold on you, don't let them take the p##s. Just follow the step by step guide, use the template letters and ask advice when needed and you'll get your money back. I personally won't communicate with any bank or credit card company over the phone in regards to this issue, i want everything in writting.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help guys, do they accept copy ID? Not keen to send original.

SAR being sent today.

Watch this space..........

Alison

RBS

13/10 - Prelim sent, 19/10 - Sod Off letter recvd, 27/10 - partial offer received, 27/10 - rejection letter sent, 3/11 - SETTLED IN FULL

Cheltenham & Gloucester (ERC's)

21/11 - Prelim sent, 26/11 - sod off letter recved, 2/12 - LBA sent, 10/12 SETTLED IN FULL!!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help guys, do they accept copy ID? Not keen to send original.

SAR being sent today.

Watch this space..........

Alison

 

Alison, copy ID is fine, a copy of driving licence is perfectly acceptable. Make sure they don't go taking £2.50 per statement off your account as you agreed to this. I would ring them and put a halt to that.

 

It would be a good idea to start a separate thread under your name so we don't hijack Luke's!!

 

Good luck and look forward to hearing how you get on!

 

Regards,

 

Corn:)

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to but in....... I did not send copy of ID, just SAR letter and cheque for ten pounds, will that cause a problem do you think? Also, while I'm here does anyone have any idea of the timescale of receiving an acknowledgement of SAR?

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to but in....... I did not send copy of ID, just SAR letter and cheque for ten pounds, will that cause a problem do you think? Also, while I'm here does anyone have any idea of the timescale of receiving an acknowledgement of SAR?

 

Hi, MBNA are employing new delaying tactics. They will wait until the 40 days is up and then send you some random statements (that will NOT have all the charges on them) and will tell you that on "this occasion" they have not treated your SAR as an SAR and will return your cheque. They will then tell you that if you want them to comply with a full SAR, can you return your payment, with ID and they will have ANOTHER 40 days to comply. This is abolute b***ocks as we all know. I would write a short letter saying the above has come to your attention and enclose a copy of your ID and, for the avoidance of doubt, the 40 days is up on X date and you expect them to reply within that time. If they do not, file an N1 on MCOL for non-compliance.

 

I hope this helps,

 

Regards,

 

Corn:)

  • Haha 1

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Talk about stalling, they are going to have to pay out eventually. They are obviously hoping people will 'give up' and they will get to keep our money, I DON'T THINK SO................

RBS

13/10 - Prelim sent, 19/10 - Sod Off letter recvd, 27/10 - partial offer received, 27/10 - rejection letter sent, 3/11 - SETTLED IN FULL

Cheltenham & Gloucester (ERC's)

21/11 - Prelim sent, 26/11 - sod off letter recved, 2/12 - LBA sent, 10/12 SETTLED IN FULL!!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Talk about stalling, they are going to have to pay out eventually. They are obviously hoping people will 'give up' and they will get to keep our money, I DON'T THINK SO................

 

You are right Alison, there are two reasons I think, they are delaying because they are overwhelmed with claims and this way they can string it out a bit longer. It's funny how they don't require ID to send you statements, ring you up and harass you and write you rude letters! I am also beginning to think that they actually can't provide any infromation under SAR in some instances, especially where accounts have been sold to DCA's.

 

Outrageous!:o

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking that, where does it state we need to send them ID to get our statements, surely through freedom of information, we don't need ID, only an account number!!

Alison

RBS

13/10 - Prelim sent, 19/10 - Sod Off letter recvd, 27/10 - partial offer received, 27/10 - rejection letter sent, 3/11 - SETTLED IN FULL

Cheltenham & Gloucester (ERC's)

21/11 - Prelim sent, 26/11 - sod off letter recved, 2/12 - LBA sent, 10/12 SETTLED IN FULL!!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking that, where does it state we need to send them ID to get our statements, surely through freedom of information, we don't need ID, only an account number!!

Alison

 

Hi Alison, of course you are correct, but the fact is they are waiting for the 40 days to be up before asking for ID. It is a delaying tactic, nothing else and completely unacceptable and we are all complaining about it in our mass complaints thread, however, it is what they are doing and to be honest, if you don't want to string your claim out any longer than you have to, just include the ID.

 

It has been pointed out on other threads that they don't, of course, require ID to send you bills or harass you! Very one sided!!!:mad:

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have taken your advice. Have written to MBNA at Chester, enclosing a copy of my driving licence and reminding them of the date of the end of the 40 days. It feels like forever though !!!!

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

FYI

I recevied my statements yesterday within 6 days (@ £2.50 per statement!! which I disagreed to, but am claiming back!) and there were 2 missing. I phoned them and they said if you write to them asking for a 'complete list of charges' on your account, it is FREE!!!

RBS

13/10 - Prelim sent, 19/10 - Sod Off letter recvd, 27/10 - partial offer received, 27/10 - rejection letter sent, 3/11 - SETTLED IN FULL

Cheltenham & Gloucester (ERC's)

21/11 - Prelim sent, 26/11 - sod off letter recved, 2/12 - LBA sent, 10/12 SETTLED IN FULL!!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...