Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

creditors letters to wrong address


vix2000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6542 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My elderly parents keep recieving creditors letters for someone who has never lived at their house. They have never had anyone living there and there has never been anyone on the electoral register.

 

On telephoning them to ask them to stop sending these letters I was told that they couldn't stop them just from a telephone call, and their investigators had given them the address. I told them their investigators are wrong, and that as the initial is the same as my mums she had opened it by mistake and they were threatening to send a doorstep collector. She was extremely upset and worried by this.

 

They would not agree to stop the letters. Can anyone tell me what I can do, if anything, about this please? Thanks.

If you found this post helpful please click on the scales, top right. Thank you.

 

If you find this site helpful and if you reclaim your charges please donate by clicking the button at the top of the page

 

First Direct 1 - settled

First Direct 2 - settled

RBS 1 - claim made 8/5/6

RBS 2 - claim made 8/5/6

GE Capital - counter claim 6/5/6

Halifax - settled 31/5/6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it the same surname?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Have found out today that my ex had his bank statements sent there for 2 months last year while he was abroad. As soon as he came back they were sent to his address. Thats the only link with the address. He has never lived there or been on the electoral register. Don't know how to approach this one. Its really upset my parents who are too old to deal with the hassle.

If you found this post helpful please click on the scales, top right. Thank you.

 

If you find this site helpful and if you reclaim your charges please donate by clicking the button at the top of the page

 

First Direct 1 - settled

First Direct 2 - settled

RBS 1 - claim made 8/5/6

RBS 2 - claim made 8/5/6

GE Capital - counter claim 6/5/6

Halifax - settled 31/5/6

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it worth sending a letter referring to oft harassment of 3rd party recommendations?

If you found this post helpful please click on the scales, top right. Thank you.

 

If you find this site helpful and if you reclaim your charges please donate by clicking the button at the top of the page

 

First Direct 1 - settled

First Direct 2 - settled

RBS 1 - claim made 8/5/6

RBS 2 - claim made 8/5/6

GE Capital - counter claim 6/5/6

Halifax - settled 31/5/6

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes. but obviously nothing to do with my parents. unfortunately 15 years ago he changed his name to mine (for family reasons)when our daughter was born so he has the same surname.

If you found this post helpful please click on the scales, top right. Thank you.

 

If you find this site helpful and if you reclaim your charges please donate by clicking the button at the top of the page

 

First Direct 1 - settled

First Direct 2 - settled

RBS 1 - claim made 8/5/6

RBS 2 - claim made 8/5/6

GE Capital - counter claim 6/5/6

Halifax - settled 31/5/6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

ah, can you not contact him, and tell him, if it is affect their health surely he would contact them? (or not?!)

 

I would write to them advising of the distress it is causing your elderly parents, and advise of a forwarding adreess if you have one...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will try that this week. Just wondered if they are legally allowed to do this. thanks for the help.

If you found this post helpful please click on the scales, top right. Thank you.

 

If you find this site helpful and if you reclaim your charges please donate by clicking the button at the top of the page

 

First Direct 1 - settled

First Direct 2 - settled

RBS 1 - claim made 8/5/6

RBS 2 - claim made 8/5/6

GE Capital - counter claim 6/5/6

Halifax - settled 31/5/6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

I would say yes, because your ex gave that address at some point, so they can chase at that address, if you were owed money from someone, you would follow all avenues too, they dont know he's not there, or that your parents are elderly.

 

Sounds Harsh, its not meant to be, when you tell them, im sure they will correct it, but you may have to write. If they still persist then maybe you could do more but im not 100% sure

 

Good Luck

 

Lou xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

1st write to your ex's creditor who alledges he owes money asking them which credit reference agency gave your parents details. Then get a copy of your parents file from that agency it'll cost £2.50. Then have a note placed on your parents file stating that your ex no longer lives there & has not for whatever number of years & their name is not to be associated with his

 

Write to the the debt collectors (with a copy of the agency letter ) advising them of what your doing that he's never lived there & that they must not harrass your elderly parents again & if they do you will report them to Trading Standards. Also in the event they do visit the police will be called & they will be accused of criminal harrasment

 

Under the OFT guidelines when advised of such a situation they are supposed to not harrass

 

The OFT do not themselves undertake such prosecutions but they will be interested in any firm wich doesn't abide by the guidelines so it's always worth letting them know what's happened.

 

May I respectively suggest the you do NOT give your ex's address to these people. They often rely on these sort of bullying tactics to get an address by chasing a party the know is innocent.

 

Advise your parents that under no circumstance should they allow anyone from these debt collectors into their home. No matter what they may claim they have no right of access.

 

PS How old is the debt? If it's 6 years old subject to certain conditions its statute barred

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice. The debt is from 2002, I think. But as they have tried contacting him I am I right that the 6 year rule doesn't apply? He won't be able to pay it if they catch up with him, anyway, and he has no assets.

If you found this post helpful please click on the scales, top right. Thank you.

 

If you find this site helpful and if you reclaim your charges please donate by clicking the button at the top of the page

 

First Direct 1 - settled

First Direct 2 - settled

RBS 1 - claim made 8/5/6

RBS 2 - claim made 8/5/6

GE Capital - counter claim 6/5/6

Halifax - settled 31/5/6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice. The debt is from 2002, I think. But as they have tried contacting him I am I right that the 6 year rule doesn't apply? He won't be able to pay it if they catch up with him, anyway, and he has no assets.

 

Yes if they have chased within the 6 years then the 6 year rule may not apply. Anyway as the debt is from 2002 it certainly doesn't apply here.

 

You or your parents are not obliged to help these people so why give yourself grief with your ex by telling them where he is. If you do as suggested that should bring matters to an end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Is there any way I can contact the credit agencies on my parents behalf as if I mention it to them it will cause more stress and worry. Or Can my ex disassociate the address on his credit report?

If you found this post helpful please click on the scales, top right. Thank you.

 

If you find this site helpful and if you reclaim your charges please donate by clicking the button at the top of the page

 

First Direct 1 - settled

First Direct 2 - settled

RBS 1 - claim made 8/5/6

RBS 2 - claim made 8/5/6

GE Capital - counter claim 6/5/6

Halifax - settled 31/5/6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Is there any way I can contact the credit agencies on my parents behalf as if I mention it to them it will cause more stress and worry. Or Can my ex disassociate the address on his credit report?

 

There are a number of online facilities you can use including the websites of the agencies themselves & all most all lenders use those agencies which I gave you or you can paste into your browser "credit reference reports"

 

Yes he can but he'll be jumping into the lions den because he will have to identify himself & where HE lives & even then they may think there being conned & refuse.

 

Also if he contacts them direct it will make it obvious that you or your parents DO know how to contact him & your parents may subject to further harassment

 

Also remember the credit agency will ONLY send their report to you parents address. For obvious reasons you cannot have it redirected to your address. So warn them it's coming

 

Almost forgot you will need their written consent to act for them including their specific consent to apply for their credit report

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Thanks a lot.

If you found this post helpful please click on the scales, top right. Thank you.

 

If you find this site helpful and if you reclaim your charges please donate by clicking the button at the top of the page

 

First Direct 1 - settled

First Direct 2 - settled

RBS 1 - claim made 8/5/6

RBS 2 - claim made 8/5/6

GE Capital - counter claim 6/5/6

Halifax - settled 31/5/6

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 10 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

If you found this post helpful please click on the scales, top right. Thank you.

 

If you find this site helpful and if you reclaim your charges please donate by clicking the button at the top of the page

 

First Direct 1 - settled

First Direct 2 - settled

RBS 1 - claim made 8/5/6

RBS 2 - claim made 8/5/6

GE Capital - counter claim 6/5/6

Halifax - settled 31/5/6

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6542 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...