Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I need a little advice!


ptothej
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6180 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently received a response from Lloyds TSB in relation to my letter before action.

They are saying that the charges are from going over my overdraft unlawfully; however they were incurred by direct debits and standing orders being processed with out enough funds to cover them.

I wanted to know if I should send a stronger letter to rebuttal there statements or should I just go full force into court proceedings, I have enclosed the letter below for people to view. Please Help!!!!:confused:

 

 

Thank you for getting in touch with us. I am sorry you are unhappy about your account charges.

Like any business, we do make a charge for some of our extra services. When customers don't have enough in their accounts to cover a payment, this always means extra work - and it has to happen very quickly.

 

We have to agree to make the payment by setting up or increasing an overdraft, or tell customers we can't agree it. We feel it's fair to charge for this service.

 

Of course it's only fair too, that we're completely open about any charged-for services before you might need them. That's why we take care to give every new customer the latest guide to our charges. You can also get up-to-date details about fees and borrowing rates at all our branches, through our helpline and on our website.

 

Just as importantly, we do everything we can to help our customers avoid these charges. You can get an up-to-date balance at any of our cash machines, over the phone, on line and by weekly text to your mobile.

 

If you know a payment is going to take you over your agreed limit, you're welcome to see if there's anything we can do.

 

The Office of Fair Trading has published new guidelines on credit card default charges. We're still talking it through with them, but the important point is that the guidelines are about 'default' charges that people pay when they break an agreement with us. This doesn't apply to your charges as these were for dealing with your request to go over your agreed overdraft limit. They are not default charges because you haven't broken your agreement. They are our prices for the service we provide in these situations.

 

I do hope you can see that we make our charging system as fair as possible and why I can't agree to cancel your charges.

­

I hope this fully answers the points you raised with us. I please let me know if there is anything else I can do to help. If we cannot come to an agreement, I will provide you with details of the Financial Ombudsman Services so they can consider your complaint independently.

 

If you are happy with the way I have dealt with your complaint, there is no reason for you to reply to my letter. If I have not heard from you by 01/05/2007 I will close my file, though of course I will re-open it should you come back at any point afterwards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Niklowe

This is another of those standard letters that they send out to try and distract you from claiming. As Lively said, issue a court summons. That is the next step.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry me again!

I'm a little confused to what the overdraft interset and interset under s.69 county courts act 1984 means (in the below section).

I know I should add my 8% in one of these but not sure which one.

Can anyone explain for me please?

 

 

Charges £xxx.xx

Overdraft Interest £xxx.xx

Interest under s.69 County Courts Act 1984 £xxx.xx

Court Fee £xx.xx

 

TOTAL £ xx.xx

 

Plus interest pursuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 from date of issue to date of judgement/settlement at £xx.xx per day {(enter daily rate here - (CHARGES+OD interest)x 0.00022 = pence per day) }OR at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that overdraft interest is the contractual interest, if you have included this in your Prelim and LBA then you need to add this as Overdraft Interest on your claim.

 

The s.69 interest is the one that is added at a daily rate, if you used the 'simple spreadsheet with interest' from this website, that'll be your 8%.

 

hope this helps!

 

Matt

*Prelim sent 6/2*

*Response received 15/2*

*LBA sent 15/2*

*N1 Submitted 12/3*

*£750 Goodwill Gesture Received 26/3*

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys - be carefull when discussing interest as it can get very confusing.

Overdraft interest, whilst part of the terms and conditions of your account, is not what people refer to as contractual interest or CI.

In short you can claim:

1) Your Default Charges

2) The apportioned interest on those charges calculated by the spreadsheets on the site.

If the above claim is not settled BEFORE you commence legal proceedings then, on commencement, you have the option to charge 8% interest in accordance with the County Courts Act 84. The CCA interest can ONLY be added when you file at the court, not before.

 

CI is a different kettle of fish and would appear as point 3 in the above list.

In simple terms look at it like this. If you go over your overfdraft limit the bank charges you an unauthorised borrowing rate of probably not far off 30%. Using the principle of reciprocity, on the basis the banks have taken money from YOU in an unauthorised fashion, it can be argued that you could charge the banks contractual rate on each charge from the date of the charge to the date of making your claim. ie. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. There has been success and failure with this argument but it is considerably more complex than a standard claim and would require a higher level of skil, determination and a considerable amount more research.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought it was along those lines so I have opted to avoid this as much as possible.

I am simply claiming charges plus the 8% from the spreedsheets as I cannot prove the charges made me exceed my overdraft and thus receive the higher interest rate charge.

 

Thanks for the advice though!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Lloyds have acknowledged my claim and the court has advised me that they now have 28 days to submit a defence, would this be working days or actual days?

 

calendar days as far as I am aware and from when claim was deemed served

If I have managed to help you in anyway then please click my scales

 

:eek::evil::-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have now recieved my allocation questionaire but I was wondering if I can add to the amount I intend to claim. During the time it has taken to get to this stage the bank has charged me on a few more occasions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Unfortunatley you can't add on any more charges after you have filed your Court claim, you would probably have to start a new claim once this one has been settled.

Good luck, let us know how you get on.

barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I submitted my allocation questionnaire on the 2nd of May and I have still not heard anything from the court about a date. I phoned today and they said they are waiting for the defendant to submit their questionnaire.

Can I send a letter to either the court or the defendant to speed this process up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...