Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A key member of the US central bank, Raphael Bostic, tells the BBC rates might only ease "at the end of 2024".View the full article
    • A key member of the US central bank, Raphael Bostic, tells the BBC rates might only ease "at the end of 2024".View the full article
    • OK, thanks, I won't wait for them. On a side note, some of the posts on here are a bit frustrating, I read through five pages or so of someone going through the court process rooting for them as I'm reading, then nothing, not heard of again. Left here wondering what the outcome was, lol!
    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because there was still £69 owing, I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle. However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account ......... has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4908 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have had two loans with Welcome Finance one for a car and one for personal use. On my car loan I took out short fall insurance in case I had my car stolen and was paying for something I did not have.

My car was stolen and short fall paid out but Welocme Finance did not tell me until 18 months later. I complained that if they had informed me my insurance company would have paid and I would have another vehicle.

They combined both accounts and told me they would knock £1500 off the account.

I have now recieved a statement (which they dont send very often and when asked seem to forget to send them) that tells me the amount loaned on 10th May 2005 was £6101.66 the amount now oustanding is £4232.34

On the statement it gives my payments per month of £140.09 and then under that is something called interest posting. For instance on 19th August 05 I paid £140.09 making my balance £5860.37 then the interest posting dated 4th September 05 is £71.16 making my balance £5931.53

Are they allowed to do this? Is it legal and is there a way I can reclaim the amounts they are extorting from me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ian cognito

sorry but i don't quite understand what you're saying here, who did the insurance pay out to and what happened to the money for the 18 months you didn't know about it, did they not knock it off your loan immediately if they received it, did your own car insurance not pay out for the stolen car also?

 

You need to check your agreement, it looks like they are adding the interest on the loan on a monthly basis, if this is the case, and they had the insurance money that was paid out without paying it off your loan immediately, they will owe you a chunk of interest.

 

Can you provide a bit more detail please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The short fall insurance paid Welcome Finance for the loss of the car. Welcome did not inform me at the time and when they did it seemed it was by accident, as the manager asked me if I had made a payment of £900 and odd pounds on the account. When I replied no he put the telephone down and I had to phone them back and kept asking for a statement off them. Eventually the statement arrived and I asked where the money had come from, they said they had no idea and assumed it was from the short fall insurance.

My own insurance company refused to pay out due to the lack of communication between Welcome and myself and AXA insurance.

As I said it was 18 months later when Welcome made the payment known to myself and it was a complicated situation with the insurance.

Welcome combined two loans together and lowered the payment and told me they had knocked off £1500.

Looking at the statement I think they have taken me for a ride and the interest they are applying each month seems unfair and a way they are using of getting their £1500 back.

I know it complicated and difficult to put into words.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to the matter with welcome finance I phoned them and they told me they dont do interest free loans. I told them I knew that but to add interest on a monthly basis seemed unfair.

I have told them I will put my complaint in writing to them and when I recive a reply will write to the fiancial ombudsman as I really do think they are taking me for a ride.

OK It may be my fault for dealing with them but I have heard so many bad things regarding their services. Also I have had a run in with them with regards to a car as I stated in my first posting.

I'll let you know how I get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I received my statements from welcome and all the fees according to the statements where refunded or as they say reversed. I decided not to press any further so basically if they have fiddled me they have got off scott free. I will be keeping an eye on the progress of my account though and I wont let them off with a thing if I think its dodgey. I will never get a loan off them again thats for sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

With regard to Welcome's PPI offers, I think any offer at the moment is a step forward. If you dont really agree with the amount offered I am sure there is scope for arguing the amount and actually taking court action and maybe end up with more than the offer.

However, will it cost more in court action?

I am happy with the offer they made me, they did however, tell me that they could not include three policies they could not include as they where past the time limit. Fingers crossed when someone eventually takes them to court they may reconsider.

One thing is for sure I will never ask Welcome for a loan ever again. I would rather ask my bank at least their customer focus is better than Welcome's, and their politness too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am happy with the offer they made me, they did however, tell me that they could not include three policies they could not include as they where past the time limit. Fingers crossed when someone eventually takes them to court they may reconsider.

One thing is for sure I will never ask Welcome for a loan ever again. I would rather ask my bank at least their customer focus is better than Welcome's, and their politness too.

 

load of rubbish!!!

 

there is no time limit for reclaiming PPI!!

 

statute of limitations act sec 32c

 

go get 'em again

 

dx

siteteam

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that I didn't know there was no time limit.

I got involved with welcome accidentally, I brought a car and they financed it, the car was written-off in an accident and they re-financed a replacement. The replacement car was stolen and they didn't tell me that the shortfall (GAP) had paid out until 18 months later (they didn't mean to tell me then either). The insurance company refused to pay up at the time, so I was paying for a car I didn't have. So I refused to pay any more money to them. I refused to reply to any of their letters. They didn't threaten me with debt collectors or anything as they knew they where in the wrong. Evetually they contacted me and we came to an agreement which at the time meant I would have wrote off £1500.00 on their loan. I reckon I have paid that though in interest, they applied the PPI without me knowing (the crafty b******ds). After I took out a bank loan to pay them off thats when I discovered the PPI, and thats when I complained. At the time they would not entertain my complaint.

My advice to anyone regarding Welcome - STAY WELL CLEAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm.....

 

the nice side of me is thinking you might have a claim here against then.

 

dunno....

 

forced to take out a bank loan to pay off unknown PPI on a refinanced A/C when they got the claim money too.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

load of rubbish!!!

 

there is no time limit for reclaiming PPI!!

 

statute of limitations act sec 32c

 

go get 'em again

 

dx

siteteam

 

Wrong,

 

There is a time bar which cannot be lifted , and it depends on the facts of each case as to whether the case is stat barred or not

 

Limitation runs from the point that the fraud or concealment becomes evident to the party, however, that is of course subject to your ability to raise such arguments on concealment,

 

There is no one size fits all answer on this point, so people should be aware of this

Link to post
Share on other sites

but not in this case as the OP was obviously not aware he had it.

 

next.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes ok i'll put my broom away then.

 

not all PPI can be reclaimed forever........

 

it might just be that you were aware you had been wronged on PPI and didn't bother claiming.

 

next......

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what section 32c states:-

 

32 Postponement of limitation period in case of fraud, concealment or

mistake

(1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4A) below, where in the case of any

action for which a period of limitation is prescribed by this Act,

either--

(a) the action is based upon the fraud of the defendant; or

(b) any fact relevant to the plaintiff's right of action has

been deliberately concealed from him by the defendant;

or

© the action is for relief from the consequences of a

mistake;

the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the plaintiff has

discovered the fraud, concealment or mistake (as the case may be)

or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what section 32c states:-

 

32 Postponement of limitation period in case of fraud, concealment or

mistake

(1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4A) below, where in the case of any

action for which a period of limitation is prescribed by this Act,

either--

(a) the action is based upon the fraud of the defendant; or

(b) any fact relevant to the plaintiff's right of action has

been deliberately concealed from him by the defendant;

or

© the action is for relief from the consequences of a

mistake;

the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the plaintiff has

discovered the fraud, concealment or mistake (as the case may be)

or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it.

 

 

Correct, and this is why i made the comment i did, as to simply say limitation never applies is grossly missleading.

 

Law is about applying the law to the individual facts of the case, not applying a one size fits all approach

 

I have close to £10k worth of costs orders against clients whom followed inaccurate advice on these forums and hence why i am trying to point out these issues, so that people are clear in what they are doing

Link to post
Share on other sites

well ok pt i see your point

but i did put refer to section 32c also maybe should of said see: section 32c.

 

all done now.

 

dx

siteteam

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...