Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
    • Currently - "the maximum daily price at 100p / kWh for electricity and 30p / kWh for gas – keep in mind that's a lot higher than the Ofgem Energy Price Cap, so if you can't afford prices to increase further, you're probably better off sticking with a protected tariff such as Flexible Octopus." Octopus Tracker is a product of our labs, available now to customers through our beta programme. Octopus Tracker is a beta product. Some things may not work the first time, and installations and processes may take longer than we'd like. Third party tech like In-home Displays won't always work, and on occasion data issues with smart meters can take significant time to fix or prevent things from working at all.   Copied straight from octopus   Feel free to shove it somewhere else    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mbna - Properly Executed Agreements


Cornucopia
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5254 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 529
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I recived my CCA request today ( day 12 )

They sent me a photo copy of application form from 1999

bottom right hand corner has my sig inside a box titled reg. by CCA 1974 and sig makes me legally binded. Rest of photo copy unreadable as for T&C.

 

Don't know what next move to be any suggestions. I was looking section 77a and 78a and thinking that they have not supplied this info.

 

An application form is not acceptable as a true copy of the executed agreement as it is missing the prescribed terms ie : credit limit, apr and repayment schedule. Refer to Rt Hon Ian McCartney's letter stating that an application is not acceptable as an agreement. Check T&C's carefully as MBNA sent me 2003 T&C's for a 1996 card.

 

It would be great if you could post it.

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah no the 12 working days are not up until this time next week... grr.

 

anyway does anyone know where I can get a copy of the consumer credit (agreements) regulations 1983 in pre 2004 amendment form? this is the stuff that we rely on to make the agreements unenforceable. if you look at my thread I'm trying to include all the relevant laws as I go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a copy (yet to be scanned) i'll try to do it and email you as soon as

 

or you can get one from the stationary office (ex hmso) for £6.10

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello chaps and chapesses

 

Thought all you on the non compliance of Subject Access Request trail against MBNA would like to know that the Information Commissioner has found in my favour and they are in contravention of the sixth principle of the Data Protection Act.

Now just how are they going to carry on with their defence? Eh?

Eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello chaps and chapesses

 

Thought all you on the non compliance of Subject Access Request trail against MBNA would like to know that the Information Commissioner has found in my favour and they are in contravention of the sixth principle of the Data Protection Act.

Now just how are they going to carry on with their defence? Eh?

Eh?

 

 

Now isn't that the BEST NEWS EVER!!!! Confirmation of what you'd said all along!!

 

Now lets see them wriggle out of that one :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

Another is it a horse or is it a goat scenario described Peter Bard. It is an agreement as per Ian McCartney and the DTI

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another is it a horse or is it a goat scenario described Peter Bard. It is an agreement as per Ian McCartney and the DTI

 

P, sorry I might have misunderstood you, you say this IS an agreement?

 

It looks like an application to me and with cut and shuffled T&C's.

 

xx

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well to me, it looks like an agreement :(..... * IF * those t&c are attached to that doc, otherwise there are NO prescibed terms on it. Are they on the back of it ??

 

I cant see the writing to confirm if it makes reference to the t&c (it probably would though)

 

dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

well to me, it looks like an agreement :(..... * IF * those t&c are attached to that doc, otherwise there are NO prescibed terms on it. Are they on the back of it ??

 

I cant see the writing to confirm if it makes reference to the t&c (it probably would though)

 

dave

 

 

Guys, is it me, or does it say APPLICATION FORM in big letters at the top. Where are the prescribed terms? Granted they are being a little more savvy by adding on T&C's, when I first got mine, there were no T&C's attached and then they shot themselves in the foot by sending T&C's from 7 years later. Why on earth would the T&C's be squeezed down the side of a sheet of paper telling you how bloody great they are??

 

I would study this document carefully to check for reconstruction.

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IN the T&C the max apr is 16.9% so can anyone tell me how I have been charged 22.9%

 

Hi Cam, you need to study this document to within an inch of it's life! MBNA sent me two lots of T&C's (by mistake I think) with two different sets of APR's but all purporting to be from the same document.

 

Go through this very carefully!

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the one which is very similar to Camusers which the Main Woman received, T&C squeezed in down the side promo on the back but why is the signature and the date separate?

I wonder if MBNA would allow it if you asked for a viewing of the original document at Chester Towers to verify what they sent you? as MBNA haven't declared in writing that this is a true copy unlike the Morgan stanley CCA which I received.

 

http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w9/Themainman_bucket/CCF04052007_00000.jpg

Capitalism is the legitimate racket

of the ruling class.

Al Capone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evenin' all. I was reading through this thread a couple of weeks ago and suddenly it prompted me to send a CCA letter to MBNA. I got their reply this morning and I think it might be a case of another unenforceable agreement. I'm not sure though so if any of the experts on here could spare the time to nip over to my thread Fred Bassett v MBNA then I'd be very grateful.

 

Cheers.

 

Fred

 

ps: got to go out soon (working behind the jump for a few extra quid! Oh Joy!), so I won't be back until the wee small hours.

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evenin' all. I was reading through this thread a couple of weeks ago and suddenly it prompted me to send a CCA letter to MBNA. I got their reply this morning and I think it might be a case of another unenforceable agreement. I'm not sure though so if any of the experts on here could spare the time to nip over to my thread Fred Bassett v MBNA then I'd be very grateful.

 

Cheers.

 

Fred

 

ps: got to go out soon (working behind the jump for a few extra quid! Oh Joy!), so I won't be back until the wee small hours.

 

 

Hi Corn

 

You have to see this to believe it.......:)

 

its one of the worst copies i've ever seen, talk about illegible !

 

AND they have signed across his sig box (V NAUGHTY and wrong)

 

they're in trouble with this one

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Corn

 

You have to see this to believe it.......:)

 

its one of the worst copies i've ever seen, talk about illegible !

 

AND they have signed across his sig box (V NAUGHTY and wrong)

 

they're in trouble with this one

 

Dave

 

Dave, hello love, I have just been over on Fred's thread and seen it. Dear oh me. Do they never learn?

 

I think the crunch will come with what they send next.

 

More hashed up bits and pieces no doubt!!!

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...