Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

foxy v abbey


FOXYLADY1970
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6194 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Why don't you have the £260 as your prep costs then...I think you deserve it! :D

 

how much less is your for

 

£100.01 short + I'm trying for preparation costs. Not sure whether she replies to e-mails but thought I'd try that 1st rather than get all flustered on the phone! :o

 

VF

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hi charleyfarley

 

how you getting on

 

foxy

 

 

You don't want to know Foxy........................but I'm very pleased for you and VF. I told you the drinks were going to be on you:p

All advice offered here is my opinion only based on what I would do in a given situation. If you wish to act on it you do so at your own discretion

......................................................

I have no legal expertise or qualification, and give advice on the basis of my own experience and nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well charleyfarley believe me I could do with a drink been in bed ill all week so this has certainly made me feel better.

 

Would have loved to have had a drink with you all that have helped and supported me with claim just glad its over will wait until money is in bank before i let the court know

 

sorry your not finished yet but fingers crossed your not far behind us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

villafan,

 

Thats what I said to my husband that will cover the time I have spent sitting on this computer reading up and doing bits. will leave it at final settlement as I think im happy with that.

 

Good luck with your claim for costs and keep me posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

just received this from the county court " Notice of allocation to the small claims track ( hearing )"

and it reads

 

DISTRICT JUDGE xxxxxxx has considered the statement of case and allocation questionnaires filed and allocated the claim to the small claims track.

 

The hearing of the claim will take place at 12:30 on the xxxxxxx at xxxxx County Court, xxxxxxxxxx and should take no longer than 30 minutes.

 

The court must be informed immediately if the case is settled by agreement before the hearing date.

 

1 The parties must file at the Court and serve on the other party not later than 14 days before the hearing the following:

 

a) copies of all documents upon which they wish to rely

b) statement of all witnesses, including the parties, upon whose evidence you wish to rely.

The statements shall by typed. dated and signed by witnesses stating that he\she believes that the facts stated in the witness statement are true.

2 all original documents must be brought to the hearing

3 the parties should note that if they do not file and serve documents and statements as set out above then the Court may decide not to admit the evidence of

the party in default.

 

Could someone please point me in the right direction. Has anyone else received something similar. Seems Abbey have filed there AQ and I don't even know what the contents are they may have picked up something to successfully defend. I included cleared transaction charges at £10 a shot . Would they use this to successully defend? Please advise.

Pandapa

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...