Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 20 million quid on just the brokering fee for a crappy deal with the UK public hocked to pay more for PPE - which was probably useless with better and cheaper per item with no 20 million quid fee - available from alibaba Stinks of corruption to me.  
    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
    • That's an idea on Maquarie. On being accountable, you also have to blame Ofwat and possibly the Environment Agency although they've been badly defunded. I put the Frost article up for balance.  
    • I agree HB, but there were no laws broken - its perfectly legal to fleece the UK and its infrastructure - and labour were little better than the Tories Perhaps an option would be to ban the aussie investment fund from the UKs markets
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Been to Court Today!


Notty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1867 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In my experience of County Courts these times can sometimes be treated as rather flexible! I sued an ex girlfriend some years ago, she missed the deadline for acknowledgement by just one day but I still got my judgment. I have heard of other cases when the defendant has acknowleged 2 or 3 days late and claimant has had the default judgment application refused.

 

I'd suggest requesting judgment - if it's refused, it's refused, what have you lost?

If I've helped, please tick the scales at the bottom left of this message!

 

17th Sept: Found this site! :)

 

Lloyds TSB

 

22 Sept: Subject Access Req.

3 Nov: statements arrived. Charges calulated at:

A/c 1 - £2,178.01 + int of £1,206.54 (18.4% authorised)

A/c 2 - £206.11 + int of £211.07 (18.4%)

7 Nov - prelim.

3 Dec - LBA

13 Dec - £750 offered

23 Dec - £750 credited

28 Dec - rejection letter

2 March - issued

16 April - complained at court failure to forward defence

 

Halifax

 

22nd September: Subject Access Request.

4th November: No reply so LBA giving 7 days.

 

Cap One

 

22nd September: Subject Access Req.

5th October: Letter saying no record of account!

15th October: Replied telling them to try harder...

22nd October: Subject Access Req acknowledged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I agree. A point I made over the phone rather forcefully over the phone in my case against my ex. I had phoned the Court to ask whether judgement had been entered as per my request and was told the answer was no, as they had received an acknowledgement, albeit a day late.

 

I ranted on about, as you say, either having rules or not having them, and threatening to seek a Judicial Review in the High Court. The staff member who had the misfortune to take my call said she'd get back to me. An hour or so later she called back, saying she had spoken to one of the judges and confimed I would have my judgment! She warned me, though, that my ex, if she had good reason for being late, could apply to have the judgment set aside and would probably succeed (in the event she didn't try).

 

So, I suspect the reality might be that they have no RIGHT to take a flexible view of the rules but in fact do so to prevent courts being clogged up with applications to have judgments set aside. But that's just a hunch. Maybe you can try threatening a Judicial Review too :)

  • Haha 1

If I've helped, please tick the scales at the bottom left of this message!

 

17th Sept: Found this site! :)

 

Lloyds TSB

 

22 Sept: Subject Access Req.

3 Nov: statements arrived. Charges calulated at:

A/c 1 - £2,178.01 + int of £1,206.54 (18.4% authorised)

A/c 2 - £206.11 + int of £211.07 (18.4%)

7 Nov - prelim.

3 Dec - LBA

13 Dec - £750 offered

23 Dec - £750 credited

28 Dec - rejection letter

2 March - issued

16 April - complained at court failure to forward defence

 

Halifax

 

22nd September: Subject Access Request.

4th November: No reply so LBA giving 7 days.

 

Cap One

 

22nd September: Subject Access Req.

5th October: Letter saying no record of account!

15th October: Replied telling them to try harder...

22nd October: Subject Access Req acknowledged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think they will still go for a set aside today? They will get the request for judgment papers tomorrow which will actually be 2 days over the deadline (30 days)? Or do I live in cuckoo land and as you say the deadlines mean diddly squat! Thanks anyway. Here goes another fiver for the registered mail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone tell me how long you have to wait once you have sent in the request for judgment papers? The deadline for Abbey entering their defence was Tuesday 19th September. I sent in the request for judgment on the 20th September. Nothing today. Can it just go on and on that they can apply for a set aside? Is there a time limit after the request for judgment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just read a thread by Nightstar, who issued a warrant as soon as the default judgment was entered:

 

(Hi Karen,

It's imperative you issue a warrant without delay, they may well go for a set-aside but then they have to convince the judge:A. they have a damn good reason why they did not defend in the alloted timescale.B. they have good reason to win the case.( which we all know isnt the case, cos they are breaking the law).

So basically issue warrant,you win, they bottle it)

 

Should I do the same? I would appreciate your help on this one, or is it best to sit back and see what Abbey do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Confuddled

I think give it 7 days from entering the default judgement and then issue the warrant I very much expect they will file for a set aside as soon as they recieve the judgment order, and when that happens we can help you fight it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Can someone please shed some light on the default judgment and how its works. Abbey acknowledged the claim and had until the 19th September to enter a defence. They didnt. I sent the judgment back on the 21st September but I havent heard anything since. What I cant understand is, as Bookworm says, they can enter a defence months after the default judgment, how do you get the money from them? I am really confused with this and not sure what I should do next? Have I done all I should do and do I just wait to hear from the court or Abbey and how long do I wait? Any help would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks as if the courts have a backlog of weeks. So if anyone thinks they will get their bank charges back from Abbey this time before Christmas, think again.

 

The deadlines are a joke. Abbey acknowledged my claim on the 6th when it states on the court paperwork the 5th was the deadline. I sent in a request for judgement but had it returned. They then had until the 20th September to defend but they didnt. I sent in request for judgement again on the 21st but as yet have not heard anything. Oh tell a lie Abbey sent me a letter today saying they were sorry I to hear that I had a complaint. This is the 3rd letter I have received from them telling me they are sorry.

 

I have just rang the court and apparently they have a back log of two weeks (my request for judgement is now 2 weeks old!) and if Abbey's defence is sitting in the pile in the cupboard they can apply for a set aside and a court hearing will be set. If my judgement gets there first they will deal with it first. What a load of b.......s.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:9 not good eh but it goes to show how many people are claiming back their charges ( it must have increased the courts workload by half again at least) keep at it and they will eventually have to go to court and prove a test case and loose and we can all then get our dosh back with one phone call. i live in hope :)

me against the abbey Paid in full (donation made)

me against the woolwich Paid in full(donation made)

me against HSBC Paid in full(donation made)

 

 

beware the scrapbooker, for she has a long memory and sharp knives :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have received 3 lots of "sorry you've got a complaint"! Headless chickens springs to mind!!!

Wanabee:cool:but easily :confused:ed!!

23/6 Data Protection Act + £10

6/7 Pam Speed ltr

7/71 yr sttmts (2nd a/c) Faxed auth. 4 £10m'fiche

9/7 Screen prints 1 1/2 mths 1st a/c/2 1/2 mths 2nd a/c

11/7 20 mths sttmts 1st a/c

25/7 DPA reminders

1/8 40 DAYS UP & NOTHING

5/8-8/9, 7/8 3 "sorry not happy"/"m'fiche not covrd"ltrs

9/8 IFO form & backup mat'l

10/8 LBA/calcs 2 Dawn Hoyle

CHECK COPY STMNTS - DON'T HAVE CHARGES AT FRONT

12/8 a/c info fm 2001

18/9 £505 GWP offer

26/9 Rej. ltr/7 days 2 court action (1st a/c)

10/10 Moneyclaim form online (1st a/c)

20/10 Ack of Serv rec'd

3/11 AQ 2 court

20/11 Abbey AQ @ court

4/1/2007 Preliminary court hearing due

30th Dec. 2006 REC'D FULL PAYMENT INTO BANK ACCOUNT - ABBEY's WITHDRAWN!!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I accepted an offer of 50% from Abbey but on the condition that the cheque was paid to me and not into my Abbey account (which they have closed) Also the condition that my account was put back to zero as it is had over £200 in charges on it. They refused to do either so I am waiting for the court to send me the allocation questionairre. Has anyone any tips on the AQ please. I know there is a thread in the library but any other advice would be welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I accepted an offer of 50% from Abbey but on the condition that the cheque was paid to me and not into my Abbey account (which they have closed) Also the condition that my account was put back to zero as it is had over £200 in charges on it. They refused to do either so I am waiting for the court to send me the allocation questionairre. Has anyone any tips on the AQ please. I know there is a thread in the library but any other advice would be welcome.

 

Here is the link.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have to have my AQ back by the 7th November but I am not sure what to put in the 'any other information' section. On the template letter it suggests the following for the N149 form:

 

(You should state here that you believe the case will last no longer than 1 hour.

You may wish to add reasons why the case is more suitable for Small Claims Track if your claim value exceeds £5,000 or provide reasoning why the other side should provide evidence of their costs! You could include similar text to this....

I am respectfully requesting that my claim be allocated to the small claims track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument.

However, the continuing problem is (in common with the 100s of other cases currently being brought by other bank customers) that the banks refuse to reveal the details of their penalty-charging regime. As the banks have a fiduciary duty towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly and in utmost good faith.

Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. I believe this would bring a rapid end to this litigation.)

 

 

I realise part of this is if its over £5000 but is there any part I should put in maybe about the standard disclosure?

On another thread barracad says to leave it blank HELP! (please)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. I believe this would bring a rapid end to this litigation.)

 

Just that bit I think will do notty

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I put mine in on 20/10/06, only got order on friday, so it can take a while depending on how busy the court is or is not. I think one of Karnevils took two months. You could ring the court just to see how things are progressing, but I would wait till the end of the month, but up to you at end of the day. I must admit I was getting a bit jittery after two weeks, you should hear soon.

 

Regards bish.

Abbey : £8070.41*PAID IN FULL*14/02/07:D

Capital one : LBA sent 17/09/06 £1,087.22

Marbles : LBA sent 17/09/06 £720.00 ; £720 offer accepted:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was offered half of my claim plus my court fee by DLA on the 10th October. I wanted my account back to 0 and the half paid to me but they refused. I was then offered £349 from Abbey (not their solicitors in October) I didnt bother replying to them. Then on the 31st October I was offered £205 (again not by their solicitor but from Milton Keynes). I received a bank statement this morning which shows £349 was paid into my account (I was £287 overdrawn which was all bank charges - 8 failed direct debits to the same company - pet insurance) The £349 obviously cleared the £287 but it also said withdrawal £017.02. As I have no access to my account as they suspended it and as I didnt know the money had been paid in I am at a loss. What the hell are they doing?

 

I am at the AQ point. Sent it in 7th November not heard anything since. What should I do about the money they have paid in? I certainly never agreed to it. Any help would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they've not contacted you about this payment and it is not a full settlement, then just proceed with the claim as normal.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1867 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...