Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that "read me", It's a lot to digest, lots of legal procedure. There was one thing that I was going to mention to you,  but in one of the conversations in that thread it was mentioned that there may be spies on the Forum,  this is something that I've read quite some time ago in a previous thread. What I had in mind was to wait for the thirty days after their reply to my CCA request and then send the unenforceable letter. I was hoping that an absence of signature could be the Silver Bullet but it seems that there are lot of layers to peel on this Onion.  
    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote... as has already been said, they use their own criteria. if a person is not stated as linked to you on your file then no cant hurt you. not all creditors use every CRA provider, there are only 3 main credit file providers mind, the rest are just 3rd party data sharers. if you already have revolving credit on your file there is no need to apply for anything just 'because' you need to show you can handle money. if you have bank account(s) and a mortgage which you are servicing (paying) then nothing more can improve your score, despite what these 'scam' sites claiml  its all a CON!!  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Someone to hold my hand (doing battle with Halifax)***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6132 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Deb

When you accepted the £6k did you accept it as partial. When you did your claim did you deduct the £6k you received from the spreadsheet! and claim for the difference!

I would not have thought that after giving you the money and you say have accepted it that they can take it away! it sounds odd to me.

Remind me again of the facts.

Thanks

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi DS,

Yes I sent the letter template from this website, accepting the £6k as partial. And he had received the letter because he was quoting from it, and in fact he said that the letter 'doesn't really say anything' (!!). I also deducted the £6k from the total - meaning that I am claiming for £5,300.

It is all clear as far as I'm concerned.

He said they can take the money back because if we go to court we are then saying that we're not accepting the £6k - maybe it's my weird grasp of the English language or something but we are not saying anything different from what I put in the letter.

On the one hand he was saying that the £6k was a goodwill gesture and not an admission of liability, and then he said that £6k was what I asked for in my first letter (so since when have they given us what we asked for?!!). The first letter I wrote was estimating £6k but i said I wanted the full list of charges from them to calculate exactly - I always made it clear it was an estimate and wanted them to clarify the amount (this was a letter I got off the MSE website before I found this site). They paid the £6k without even sending the list of charges!!!!!!!

DS, do you reckon we should still stick with Plan A and file for court after 17th May for the £5,300?

 

Thanks, Debbie

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Debbie,

 

Sorry i never got back to you,

 

I think yes you should continue with your claim, as for them taking the money back, im not too sure as its a lot of money and as you said, some of it has gone, so it would set off another cycle of charges if they did.

 

I think you should double check with a mod, just to cover all bases.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks SSL. Have asked a mod to have a look.

I have registered with MCOL website in readiness for tomorrow.

 

Bring it on.......

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats the attitude....:D

Let us know how you get on.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just another thing -

I will check everything through tonight and amend the spreadsheets to show just the £5,300 we are now claiming so I can calculate the interest, rather than the full £11k (as we already got £6k back).

I'm sure I'm right in thinking that I therefore discount the first £6k of charges and interest, ie from March 2001 onwards? Then I'll put on the Particulars of Claim the start date as from when the £5,300 of charges starts (e.g March 2004). Don't want to make a silly mistake at this stage.

Also, is it necessary to put the date I opened the account as I've been with the Halifax for about 20 yrs!! But not sure of exact date. First as single customer and then joint with hubby when we married.

 

Stiil - bring it on.......:evil:

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can they legally take 6K out of your account? It's quite clear that you accepted it as part settlement and would be pursuing them for the rest. I should hope that a judge would see this as what it clearly is a bully tactic. You stick to your guns girl, I hope you get every penny they owe you. I think I'd be tempted to transfer the money into a different 'banks' account ;-)

Regards, Joan

First letter to halifax sent rec del 26/4

Data Protection Act letter to capital one sent rec del 26/4

Halifax 1st offer dated 5/5

Capital One ack Data Protection Act request rec 6/5

Request for repayment to Capital One 2/8

LBA sent 22/8

Court proceedings issued 13/10

Settled in Full 9/11

Donation made 14/11

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless they've said that they've refunded the contractual interest in this offer, then i'd subtract the latest charges to the value of the offer,[unless they've said it's the earliest charges they've refunded] then carry on for the rest, also, don't forget the interest on these ''refunded'' charges.

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi C allen, well, if I think I understand what you mean (at almost 4:30pm!!!!) they didn't say the £6k was a refund of anything - just a goodwill gesture - and therfore no dates as to which charges they refunded, cos according to them they haven't!!

So you reckon I should still claim for the interest on the charges (£6k) I already got back? That's interesting if a little confusing......

Thanks, debbie

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

i agree it's very confusing, the way i look at it is

1 they've made a refund without saying what the refund is for.

2 you must assume that the refund is charges only, they deny any claim for C/I in all claims [ to my knowledge] until they settle.-surely it's up to them to explian just what this so called ''gesture of good will'' is,........ unless it's just them being nice and giving you free money, which i doubt, you could carry on for the full amount, as in their own words , it is a ''G,O,G,W'', THEREFORE NOT A REFUND, so your claim still stands ................anyone????? only [half ]joking;)

3 as they've not explainded what they've paid you, work it out in the most favourable terms for you.

this is just what i'd do,and i may be wrong in thinking this way, but it's them thats muddied the water, i'm just trying to see through the murk:D

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

deb - Have had a quick scan of the last couple of pages.

 

Have you filed yet?

 

If not, I would suggest, having been told that the £6k is to be withdrawn, that your claim be for the full amount as stated in the LBA (plus any later charges).

 

If they leave the money in the account and inform the court in their defence papers that they have made a payment of £6k, then you can amend the total in dispute when you receive your AQ.

 

I presume you are 'only' claiming Statutory Interest?

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jonni, and thanks for replying.

I get what you are saying. So it won't harm to claim for the full £11,300 especially as we think they might take the money out of the a/c ?

Haven't filed yet but will do tomorrow. am just preparing spreadsheets and printing etc

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

by the way, yes only claiming the 8% interest - all my brain will cope with lol!

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right........

Have done virtually all the MCOL form - except hitting the 'submit' button! Still want to re-read it all tomorrow.

I took the POC details from what is in the templates on this site - is that right? Obviously I changed various bits where necessary (figures etc), but am I right to calculate the daily interest still even though not claiming for 'overdraft interest' , just the 8% interest. Got a bit confused there. I took Jonni's advice and am claiming for the whole amount - let Halifax tell the Court they already gave us £6k as a so-called 'GOGW' - they're the ones confusing everything.

I will wait for someone to check this post before I do anything more with MCOL - oooh, it's a bit daunting!!

:-)

Debbie

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can someone read my last post....am now about to file claim via MCOL. Just wanted to make sure I've done it right.

 

Thanks :-)

Debbie

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if it helps, this is what I wrote in the Particulars of Claim section -

 

1 The Claimant has an account xxxxxxx with

the Defendant. 2 Since 02/04/01 the

Defendant debited charges and interest in

respect of purported breaches of contract.

3 Defendant is aware of all details as a

list of charges has already been supplied.

Another copy will be sent. 4 Claimant

contends: (a) The charges exceed the

Defendant's losses caused by the breaches;

(b) The Term permitting the Defendant to

levy such charges is unenforceable under

the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts

Regulations 1999, Unfair Contract Terms Act

1977 and at Common Law. 5 Claimant claims:

(a) return of the amounts debited of

£11,324; (b)Interest per S.69 County Courts

Act 1984 of 8% - £2,161.44 continuing at 8%

until judgement or settlement at a daily

rate of £2.97. 6 Alternatively, if the

charges are a fee for a service, then they

must be reasonable under S.15 of the Supply

of Goods and Services Act 1982. 7 Costs

allowed by the Court.

 

Does this look right?

Ok to send?

 

Thanks :-)

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, it seems to cover everything in the little space provided

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reading it.

I think I'll just get on and finish it now - any more waiting and I'll change my mind!! LOL!

 

Watch this space.....

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

That looks fine.

And like jonni says, if they dont take back the 6k, then you can inform the court later.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks SSL - that's it then - time to file it.

 

:-)

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Righto -

Have filed claim via MCOL for total of £13,485.44 - it's a biggy!!

 

It now says that the request has gone to the Court to be verified bfore being issued. Do I send just one copy of the schedule of charges and interest by post to the Court? It's just that it says to send 2 copies on the onfo on this site, and I don't understand why.

And do I send the schedule and covering letter now or wait until it has been issued?

Have NEVER done anything like this in my life......

 

Thanks, Debbie

:-)

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claim request has now been issued according to MCOL site.

Am now posting schedule of charges and covering letter to the Northampton County Court so they can attach to my claim.

I don't know if Halifax will know about it all yet, but the money is still in the account!

At this rate I'll have no finger nails left!! LOL!

 

Debbie :-)

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

This will give you a laugh.......

I forgot to say previously that in the last week we received a letter from a certain 'Data Controller' regarding the 6 yrs of statements (those are the ones I requested in the SAR on 12th March!!!!) would be following shortly......and last Tues yet another person replied to an e-mail I sent on 26th March (to check they received my SAR) saying they couldn't find my request on the database, and asking ME for the date of the letter, and also how I paid - cash or cheque. I will wait until I win and then reply to this person.......

This is just pure and simple evidence of the fact that they do not record anything on their systems and no-one really seems to know what they are doing.

In case you're wondering (but you might not be!) the reason I have been able to carry on with this and already be at the stage of filing in court is because someone in Customer Relations sent me a spreadsheet kind of list of all charges for last 6 yrs - the statements I have now received do correlate with them!!

 

Anyway, thought this would give you a laugh on a rainy Saturday afternoon!!

 

Debbie :-)

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received Notice of Issue from Northampton County Court yesterday. It says that the claim is deemed to have been served today (23rd May) and the Halifax has until 6th June to reply........

Watch this space then...

Debbie :-))

12th March 2007 - sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and £10 to Halifax.

 

3rd May 2007 - LBA sent to Halifax.

 

15th May 2007 - £2,500 offered over phone (full amount asked for is £5,300) - OFFER DECLINED.

 

17th May 2007 - Filed claim via MCOL.

18th May 2007 - Claim request issued.

 

Notice of Issue received from Court - 22/5/07.

Claim deemed to have been served as of 23/5/07.

Notice of Acknowledgement received from Court - 31/5/07.

Halifax now have until 20th June to file defence or whatever......

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...