Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Aesmith - Thank you for your recent interest in my issues.  Input on people's topics can be most useful from specialised experts or those that have similar experiences.  Some people really struggle with knowing what to do (I certainly do) - so it is most useful and helpful and reassuring when solid sensible advice is offered.  I have found there to be some very kind, helpful, supportive and legally knowledgeable people here on cag over the years - who give sound legal advice for people to roll up their sleeves and follow up on.   Of course, sometimes it can be quite challenging sifting the wheat from the chaff.  I don't have lawyer or barrister.  I sometimes attend pro-bono legal clinics for help.  And sometimes have access to barristers via a pro-bono service called Advocate.  Both ad-hoc. 
    • The Judge was wrong. The keeper is only INVITED to say who was driving, there is no obligation for them to say.
    • Member of the Question Time audience asks Richard Tice about Donald Trump.    
    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ironside v MBNA


ironside
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6212 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wonder if anyone has some advice about what I should do about MBNA. I requested just over £2000 in charges to be paid back and received a letter from Stuart Johnson (Assistant VP) this morning. It contained the usual pap about saying their charges are fair etc. and then said that they would credit a goodwill payment of £850 to my account for full and final settlement of the complaint.

 

I've noticed that there does not seem to be too much in the way of success stories for MBNA on this site.

 

Soooo.... Deal or No Deal?

 

Any ideas? I have half a mind to push it, but I'm not sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Has anyone refused a partial payment from MBNA and received the full amount instead? I have been told they are crediting my account with £850, out of the £2000 I requested.

 

I have no idea how this figure was arrived at, but I am wondering whether I should send in a letter accepting it as part payment and requesting the rest?

 

There is a bit of an ominous paragraph at the end of the letter I received, which is why I am hesitating...

 

"You may know that the Office of Fair Trading issued guidelines in April 2006 for the level of credit card default charges. MBNA disagrees with the OFT's interpretation of the law and continues to maintain that its default charges have always been fair, legal and transparent. However, we decided to reduce our default charges to £12 with effect from 28 June for late payments and returned payments, and 28 July for overlimit fees. You will have received notification of the changes to the Terms and Conditions, which we expect you to honour. If you do not do so, we will have no alternative but to cancel your card and to formally terminate your credit agreement". I don't fancy having to pay back the outstanding balance at this point. Are they just telling me that I have to accept these charges in future, or that if I don't accept their offer they will terminate? It's a little ambiguous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ironside

 

It might be an idea to read "Mbna Properly Executed Agreements" by Cornuccopia. It's a long thread but very informative

lazybones :D

 

All opinions expressed by me are my own personal ones........

If in doubt seek Professional Advice

__________________________

 

MBNA....... S.A.R....Posted..12/3/07

Delivered..13/3/07..Replied..20/4/07-- Incmplete

Non-compliance letter sent...01/05/07

LTSB........S.A.R. ..Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..20/3/07..Replied..21/4/07--Incoplete

Non-compliance letter sent...07/05/07

AL+LE...... S.A.R... Posted..14/3/07

Delivered..15/3/07..Replied..20/4/07--Complete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice. I read the thread you mentioned Lazybones, but I'm not certain how it relates to me exactly. I'm a bit of a dunce when it comes to this kind of thing :) Are you saying they should have sent me my original application back?

 

The items I received from them were the letter with the goodwill offer on it, a data protection act request slip and lots of pages of printed transactions. They didn't send the application or copies of my statements. On the letter it says "we have enclosed details of your statement information. On this occasion we have provided the information to you free of charge, as we have not treated your request as a formal data subject access request under sction 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998. Please find enclosed your £10 cheque payment. Should this information be insufficient for your purposes, and you wish to make a full data subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998, please complete and return the attached form."

 

I don't know why they just didn't send my statements like I originally asked. The good thing was that I had kept them all, so I was able to calculate my charges anyway.

 

It looks like the best thing to do is accept as part payment and request the rest. Do you agree?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice. I read the thread you mentioned Lazybones, but I'm not certain how it relates to me exactly. I'm a bit of a dunce when it comes to this kind of thing :) Are you saying they should have sent me my original application back?

 

The items I received from them were the letter with the goodwill offer on it, a data protection act request slip and lots of pages of printed transactions. They didn't send the application or copies of my statements. On the letter it says "we have enclosed details of your statement information. On this occasion we have provided the information to you free of charge, as we have not treated your request as a formal data subject access request under sction 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998. Please find enclosed your £10 cheque payment. Should this information be insufficient for your purposes, and you wish to make a full data subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998, please complete and return the attached form."

 

I don't know why they just didn't send my statements like I originally asked. The good thing was that I had kept them all, so I was able to calculate my charges anyway.

 

It looks like the best thing to do is accept as part payment and request the rest. Do you agree?

 

Hi ironside they cannot say thet are not treating as SAR it is a legal requirement to comply with request, You say you have all statement you require but I would push for full SAR, also send CCA (it will give them more of a headace and they have to produce) if they dont then take them to court there are examples on forums of people doing this.

 

dpick:shock:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ironside - definitely, as dpick says, request a copy of your original executed agreement. (they must send it 12 days + 2 for posting)It costs £1, and you should tell them that the £1 is for the copy of the agreement and is not to be used for any other reason. (i.e. credit to your account). When (and if) you receive it, come back on here and tell us -for MBNA seem to have a problem locating original agreements, and may send you an application form - which is NOT what you want.

Do a partial acceptance as well - there are loads of us battling with MBNA here, and WE'RE NOT GIVING UP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ironside - definitely, as dpick says, request a copy of your original executed agreement. (they must send it 12 days + 2 for posting)It costs £1, and you should tell them that the £1 is for the copy of the agreement and is not to be used for any other reason. (i.e. credit to your account). When (and if) you receive it, come back on here and tell us -for MBNA seem to have a problem locating original agreements, and may send you an application form - which is NOT what you want.

Do a partial acceptance as well - there are loads of us battling with MBNA here, and WE'RE NOT GIVING UP!

 

 

Hi ladybird17 MBNA have done to me as you describe above with my CCA request. When I rang customer line was told you are in arrears so we can take any monies received off your account. I said that CCA request is a legal request you have to comply with and she put phone down on me. So I emailed [email protected] with details as above reminding them of my timescale.

 

Ironside watch MBNA they will try anything to delay, intimidate you just keep going and you will get paid.

 

all the best with your claim dpick:razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice!

 

I have asked them for everything they have on me now; in particular the original application & actual statements. I've given them 7 days to sort it out, so hopefully I'll hear something by the end of the week :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ironside - the CCA request (£1) and the SAR (£10) are two different things. And as far as the SAR is concerned, they are not obligated to send you statements. The are obligated to send you details of your transactions & charges, but this can be a list, a schedule or a print-out. Some banks choose to send you statements but they don't have to. If you read the SAR letter, it takes account of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Well, that's weird! I received a letter from MBNA today. I had asked for everything they had on me, including the original application and actual statements. I already had the statements that I had kept for accounting purposes, so I wasn't so bothered about those.

 

However, the letter that came today said ... "you have been charged fees totalling £1809 in the past six years, of which £25 has previously been refunded. Therefore, as we would like to resolve this matter, we have arranged a further goodwill payment of £934 to be sent credited to your account. This is in addition to the previous goodwill payment of £860... blah blah"

 

There are two odd things about this:

 

1. I didn't ask for the extra payment. I just asked for all the info to be sent to me so I could check it over.

2. They have caved in completely.

 

In the letter, they have attached the same copies of transaction lists (not statements) that they sent last time, and my £10 cheque back... No application copy.

 

Do you think this total collapse is something to do with that? I'm very happy they have paid up in full, but I feel like asking for the application copy again (just to be annoying!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask for it. They have something to hide. I bet your agreement is just teh application form which opens you up to asking them to refund a lot more. Yes accept the money but get that form and all the SAR info. Return the £10 SAR request cheque as I think if you bank it they will use it to say well he accepted the refund and therefore didn't want the SAR. This is amazing stuff. I think they are in a mess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are in a mess - much against my better judgment - I called them just now - mainly because my account has been in dispute since end Jan. and they are now out of time with my CCA request, but not only have they ignored me, but they have continued to send letters threatening default and today I got letter to sat they are about to start legal proceedings - so whilst I always advocate keeping everything in writing - I had to pent my wrath!

 

The guy I spoke to was actually quite helpful, but he didn't understand about the CCA & kept putting me on hold, then he said he'd try to get the agreement out to me - I said don't bother - you're out of time. He then asked me how much I was claiming back - great - I'm not claiming back anything (yet!) just wanted my agreement!

 

Told him all I had called for was to ensure they stop the threatening letters, as it is they that are in default not me - after 20mns. of holding and him coming back and asking another irrelevant question, I hung up - and as my home phone number has been changed - they won't be calling ME!!!

 

Did point out to him that as they have breached the CCA their threatening letters are not going to look good for them in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...