Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NHS / Private Orthodontists (long sorry)


Guest Gertie100
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6224 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest Gertie100

My neice went to see her NHS orthodontist who gave her braces - not the normal fixed brace, think it was called a block one(?)

This brace made my neice's bottom jaw stick out because they claimed that the problem was with her jaw, not her teeth.

She wore it for about 2 weeks and during this time suffered quite badly as she couldn't talk or eat properly.

In the end with the agreement of her parents she stopped wearing it.

 

My sister then decided to see another orthodontist as she was not happy with the treatment given with the NHS.

She paid £95 and yesterday saw a different one privately. He told her that the original brace made her look gormless, and that they could do 95% of the correction work using a normal fixed brace.

Marvellous thought my sister who had always believed that the first one went slightly over the top...

The private orthodontist then told her that it would be approx £3k.

After my sister had picked herself up off the floor she asked why she would be paying, was it cosmetic?

No, she did need the brace, but in order to get it on the NHS she has to go to the back of the queue again to wait for the new brace? Even though she waited 2 years to see the original orthodontist?

 

Also she was then told that once she had started the "private" route of treatment she couldn't go back to the NHS? Is this true? Cos that's not how doctors work is it? You can pay to see the consultant and then have the work done on the NHS (obviously by joining the queue!!)

 

ANyway (apologies for being long) - does anyone think she has cause for complaint - bearing in mind that her daughter is 15 this year, so waiting another 2 years for treatment will make her ineligable for NHS treatment anyway!

If she does have cause for complaint who should we approach?

 

Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I don't want to be Jonny Raincloud, but I think you could go through the usual NHS complaints procedure (local NHS, Healthcare Commission and then Ombudsman) and still get nowhere.

Our son was born with plagiocephaly (a deformation of the scull) which was obvious from birth but didn't get picked up until we mentioned it to our GP when he was four months old. We were referred to a paediatrician in our local hospital who we could see after six weeks waiting time. He agreed it was plagio but said it would probably self correct as he grew older and there was no treatment on the NHS anyway and discharged us back to our GP. We saw a private consultant who fitted our son with an orthosis (a helmet like device) that is worn daily to correct the shape of the scull as the baby grows.

The treatment worked perfectly, we paid over £1200.- and almost forgot about it when we noticed a newspaper article. It was reported that this helmet therapy was conducted by the Bristol Frenchay Childrens Hospital very successfully on the NHS and it was telling about how many referrals they are getting from all over the country etc etc

Bottom line was, the treatment was availbale on the NHS , only a few miles up the road in Bristol but we were told it wa snot available and fobbed off. We went through the entire complaints procedure of the NHS which took almost two years to fight for retrospective funding of our son's treatment, but did we get anywhere ? No, of course not. They all stick together and if any of the bodies involved claims they are "independent" and conduct "independent reviews" of cases...well believe me they are not and they do not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...