Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

When you have filed your AQ................


lateralus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6114 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

To all those who have filed their AQ’s

As this is fairly new territory to the group as a whole, I’ve decided some info is needed for the period of time following the AQ filing.

 

Only a couple of months ago – very few got to this stage, now it is becoming routine.

Filling in your AQ’s last week or so – I saw the same questions over and over. Let’s take this next stage and look at it.

 

So, you’ve filed your AQ. An offer could come at any time.

As always – you are fighting this on two fronts: DG and the courts

 

ok, at this point i'm going to insert a letter that rob-the-viking wrote - he wrote this to his local county court and received a court date shortly after - so it may have moved things along - tweak it to your own details - here is the letter:

 

Address

 

You Vs HSBC

Claim No

DATE

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

I write to bring to your attention to the fact that the above claim has been waiting for action on the part the defendant for quite some time now.

 

Over 5 weeks have now elapsed since the deadline for submission of Allocation Questionnaires, and as of xx/xx/xx the defendant has yet to file theirs. In my opinion I believe this to be totally unacceptable, with the defendant showing a severe disregard for the clear instructions set out by the Court. Therefore, I respectfully request that the defence be struck out on the grounds of abuse of process by the defendant.

 

In my attempts to resolve this matter without further misuse of the Courts time, I sent the defendant a letter reminding them of the aforementioned deadline dated xx/xx/xx. Please find a copy of this letter attached, also attached is proof of both postage and receipt, via the Royal Mail’s recorded delivery service.

 

Should you need to contact me about any matter that may arise in this case, please do not hesitate to do so using either the above address or phone number.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

yours faithfully

 

Your Name

 

 

 

 

 

 

A NEW LETTER AS OF 31 MARCH;

Apparently, due to the high volume of cases coming into the court, the courts have, in some cases, decided that an allocation questionaire won't be necessary. While this is good as it means the judge will act more quickly - it also gives us an excellent opportunity to prod DG in my mind. Not sure as yet what it means to the new strategy - i'll be back with more info.

So, if you are a recipient of one of the letters telling you that an aq won't be required - I think you should then send DG this:

 

 

 

this is the thread about this situation where the aq has been dispensed with:

New---after 28 Days - Maybe No Aq!!!!!!!

 

 

 

As for the COURT side of things:

this is probably the most important thing i am writing on this thread so please read it: WHEN THE COURT SEND YOU THE DIRECTIONS (WHAT NEEDS DOING), IF YOU WANT US TO HELP - PUT THE FULL DIRECTIONS ON YOUR THREAD SO WE CAN READ AND ADVISE IMMEDIATELY! it's no good telling us you've missed a date - we don't do miracles! we can help but we have to know what is required.

 

 

Keep this in mind - an offer is much preferable to a default judgment!

You’ve filed your AQ – they have exactly the same deadline – so:

Just after the deadline: ring the court to see if they have filed their AQ. The court routinely gives them an extra 7 or 14 days to file. Whatever they say, like they have until xx/xx/xx to file their AQ. The day after that date, ring again and ask if they have filed their AQ. If they say no – ask if the judge will be issuing an “unless order” (unless they file by xx/xx/xx – their defence will be thrown out). When that has passed – ring the court again and ask what the next step is.

They may not file their AQ at all and you may be able to apply for a judgment in default. The court will tell you how to proceed.

To enter Judgment in Default you will need to file a form from the court, this is known as a "Request for Judgment" Form.

The form you need is an N225, find one here: http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/H...forms_id =465.

 

Also on the COURT side of things:

If the judge agrees with the draft order and makes it a direction, it will come back to you and you will have 14 days (the date will be on the paperwork) to send in four things.

a) your schedule of charges.

b) your statements showing the charges. Alternatively, the list of charges which the bank provided under your S.A.R (subject Access Request) (only send the statements with charges on them.)

c) A Statement of Evidence: (post 55 in the new strategy): New strategy for Allocation Questionaires note here: hsbc uses the service charge defence - so use the first letter in post 55

d) All the statutes and decided cases on which your claim relies. ie, UTCCR's, UCTA's, SOGA, case law, etc. For this, I'd just submit the whole of the Basic Court Bundle.

AND AFTER THE LLOYD'S WIN - LET'S BE SURE THERE'S A COPY OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THE BUNDLE.

 

This whole thing runs to around 200 pages and should be done in triplicate: one copy for you, one for the court and one for dg – that’s 600 pages of copying – LEAVE IT UNTIL YOU KNOW FOR SURE YOU NEED IT. If an offer comes in from DG and is accepted you wouldn’t need it. Really leave it until you have to do it to meet the deadline set by the court!

 

courtesy of hagenuk: some t & c's from 2004

Attached Filespdf.gifpersonal_banking_terms.pdf (177.1 KB, 40 views)

All of this is my take on what happens after the AQ is filed – not CAG policy – just my opinion. Don’t hold me to it……I don’t want to go to court either! Good luck!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 299
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks very much for this, Lattie. It answers a lot of questions for me, and saves them being answered for the rest of the dirty dozen (Netty now honourably excluded!).

 

I'll read it a bit slower now, and make sure I understand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as always, well explained.. well done mammie lattie;)

[FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=purple]S.A.R. sent 30 October-reply received 10 november[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=purple]Prelim letter sent 28 november- no reply[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=purple]LBA sent 13 december- no reply[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=purple]MCOL filed 30 december- issued 02/01/07[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=#800080]loveletter from colin received 02/01/07-saying will get in touch on feb 9[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=#800080]acknowledged claim on 4 jan- has until 1 feb to defend.[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=#800080]defence entered 31 jan 2007[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=#800080]offer received 1-2-2007... still waiting for the moolah though:cool: ...[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=#800080]and moolah arrives 1-march 2007!!! Praise the Lord!!!![/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

i sure am... thanks.

[FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=purple]S.A.R. sent 30 October-reply received 10 november[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=purple]Prelim letter sent 28 november- no reply[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=purple]LBA sent 13 december- no reply[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=purple]MCOL filed 30 december- issued 02/01/07[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=#800080]loveletter from colin received 02/01/07-saying will get in touch on feb 9[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=#800080]acknowledged claim on 4 jan- has until 1 feb to defend.[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=#800080]defence entered 31 jan 2007[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=#800080]offer received 1-2-2007... still waiting for the moolah though:cool: ...[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=#800080]and moolah arrives 1-march 2007!!! Praise the Lord!!!![/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time scale on AQ is more like this:

deadline for filing expires

following day goes to judge

judge takes 5 days to get round to dealing with it. Issues "unless order" and passes it to court admin to deal with it.

Admin send it out 2 weeks later.

So if bank don't file AQ have aprox 4 weeks grace.

Makes a mockery of "fast track" really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR WIN!

it does often look like the courts lean over backward for them - but they are the defendant after all - were we in their position - i would hope for the same consideration. (flying pigs spotted above!)

anyway - i'm glad you won, bet you are too!

spend wisely!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That advice came at just the right time,Lateralus, I'[ve to phone the court tomorrow to see if DG have submitted their AQ(they've already filed a defence).

This now looks as if they (DG) have found this time-wasting exercise of waiting for the court to say thry've got to file by XXXXX, which Nogard described so eloquently.

Looks as if I'm at the start of a new phase - but if I keep on at DG as advised, what do I say without actually negotiating - how do I justify continually phoning them?

Any advice will be gratefuly received as usual - I'm in unknown territory again!

 

Thanks in advance

John:confused:

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS I've spoken to them last week, but there's been no offer since Colin the man made his derisory effort!

Is this unusual?

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

why are you still talking to Colin ?... unless he makes an offer your dealing with DG his legal puppies... just phone cuz ya want to... say its you and leave yer number to get back to you.... there is a huge snowball about to hit this system and they are going to go under with the volume of claims... if ya dont claim it back they will just declare it as profit... lol

 

Lattie.... nice thread xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

johnnym, i wrote this specifically for big group of you who filed aq's over the last few days.

it's not unusual not to hear from them - if they have your breakdown, the next time dg contacts you will be with an offer.

don't harass them - but keep in touch - offering any info they might need... ask about the status of your claim.... tell them you cost to settle has gone up by £100 now your filed your AQ....... whatever!

 

i'm hoping the info on this thread will inform, settle some nerves and keep the filers on top of things with a little working knowledge.

 

good luck,

 

i think anytime dg says your claim is "with the client", "being looked at", "with the bank", etc. an offer will be coming pretty sharpish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

absolutely brilliant lats... that will put a few uneasy minds at rest for sure.

thank you for that (too late for me - i 'nearly' got my spondoolies)lol

 

nice and easy to understand xxx

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank You, very helpful no idea who DG are by the way as I'm with Lloyds but the timetables after the AQ must be the same for all of us. isn't it.

 

Pen

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great thread with loads of useful info in Lattie. I'm not at this stage as yet, but will be in a few weeks. It's good to get the procedure into my head in advance though!

25/01/07 Statements collected online

27/01/07 Prelim sent

09/02/07 Thank you letter received (and duly ignored)

12/02/07 LBA on its way

27/02/07 MCOL filed

26/03/07 Defence entered

02/04/07 Notice of transfer paperwork received

10/04/07 Lattie's hastner sent

19/04/07 AQ arrived (never mind lattie!)

20/04/07 Last Chance letter sent to DG, AQ filled out.

08/05/07 AQ returned to courts, cc'd to DG

11/06/07 Request for the defence to be struck out sent after not hearing from the court for 5 long weeks.

14/06/07 Directions hearing set for the end of August. 10 long weeks away.

14/06/07 rob-the-viking waits yet longer......

23/08/07 DG apply for a stay, instantly granted by judge.

29/08/07 The waiting begins again, 7 months since prelim was sent.

 

"If you kick a Tiger in the ass, you'd better have a plan to deal with it's teeth!!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I may have given you the wrong end of the stick Castlebest, what I meant was 'the only time I've had an offer it was from Colin' . I obviously haven't spoken to him since DG became involved. I'm just hoping they'll come up with one shortly - I phoned the Court today and they said to give them a couple of days grace then ask for a judgement.

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a much more relaxed method. At no time did i contact DG or them contact me until i got an offer in full. I didn't send DG a breakdown nor did they ask. I wrote to colin twice, he replied just once, a week after i had filed on MCOL offering about 80% of claim which i rejected. That was total corespondence until i got full settlement. So send in the paperwork,everyone, then just sit back and wait.No worries.

Link to post
Share on other sites

whatever works! that's partially what's behind this thread - for others to tell their experience but mostly for the growing numbers who find themselves filing their aq and asking what happens next.

thankx for your input nogard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought,but perhaps what is slowing down the payments is that DG are so busy dealing with constant phone calls and e mails that they dont have time to process the claims. Perhaps if every one just left them alone to get on with it then the pay outs would come quicker.

Just a thought.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice post latty. :-D

 

I would recommend nogard's approach. Contact DG if you need to, by all means, and they often point blank refuse to pay out without a breakdown, but its not good to hassle them too much. The staff in that office are generally fairly decent people just doing a job.

I also think that too much pestering can also make you look desperate, I think you are more likely to get a lower offer if you do... ;-)

Get your paperwork right, stick to your timetable, but take it easy. I have won 3 times against hsbc, but only spoken to DG by phone twice in all that time....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...