Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The digital bank has introduced three new plans - Extra, Perks and Max - replacing its existing Plus and Premium plans for new customers.View the full article
    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Urgent Attention Please Read - Claims in Scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5256 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi smoorach, yes the thread jumps about a bit, and by adding your own personal experiences it can only help others decide what action to follow, as you know the discussion was in regards to claimants who wish to claim more than £1500 and from the CB who at the moment are having the 2nd claim thrown out as incompetent, this leaves no judge in doubt of their defence as mine had said it is unequivocal. The discussions are how to get around this now, which appears to be.

 

A/ Claim in England if possible.

B/ Complain to the FOS after the bank make their final offer.

C/ Raise an OA.

 

Yes thats prob best for the moment Caro until we get a clearer picture of things, also it is may be worth complaining through the FOS after the bank has made their final offer, as i said in an earlier post though this will cost the bank. (£600 per complaint)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 415
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

sorry big mac, wasn't very clear, last claim was summary cause and they settled before prelim hearing, this time(2nd claim) prelim is on 14/03/07 and full hearing 21/03/07 and not a word from them, started panicking after reading your case with CB and considered dropping this (2nd) case and just going McColl if that would help me, cos I still have £5000 to go!!!!!!!!! any advice would be welcome as you guys got me this far.........

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all just started the process off recouping my dosh from hbos, i've managed to get my statements and have sent a 14day letter to hbos requesting refund of all charges plus interest or i'm going to recover via the legal route ( amount £4200 ), they have till next Thursday 22nd March to respond.

I'm a bit lost as to the best way to progress it at this stage, I am Scottish based and it was my intention to recover through the English courts by using a PO box or an English mailing address as a service address. Can anyone advise me if this is in fact the best route to take and also if there are any pitfalls that I should look out for?

Does anyone know if I can use MCOL using the above method?

Many thanks in anticipation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I have just had my fob off letter from the Clydesdale bank and was going to send them a lba but having read some of this thread i am not sure if i should hold on.

 

I am waiting for statements for another two accounts should i wait till i have all the figures from all the accounts before lba and do one claim?I had been going to do three claims one for each account.

 

Any advice would be welcome?

Link to post
Share on other sites

KATIEROSE: Each account is different therefore a claim for each account is NOT seen as an abuse of the court.

 

QUIDSINN: You can use an english address to claim in england but you have started your process using a Scottish address, pitfalls would be having to appear in court if it got that far, yes you could use MCOL. I have found that a simple phone call to them can sometimes avoid the need to take court action, the person you would need to speak to would be the name on the offer you will more than likely receive after sending the LBA, always worth a try.

 

PENNYWISE: OA would require you to have a lawyer, the link to complaining through the FOS is below.

Financial Ombudsman Service

 

MUNGO: As your claim is for two accounts could you tell me the amount for each one, if one is under £1500 then you could raise a summary cause, if both are over this amount then an OA for each to avoid the possibility of throwing out due to 2 or more claims on each account, you would require a lawyer and risks of costs go up, in regards to the above link i would wait until the bank make their final offer and then if it is not acceptable make a complaint.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

my big mate has just had a letter from clydesdale telling him that they will be defending in court next week.He had claimed for £1298,last december they payed him out half that amount,he accepted as was the advice on this site at the time,but sent a letter to them saying he would accept this but intended to sue for the rest.

 

The bank in this new letter are saying that since he accepted this cheque he accepted full and final settlement.Now hes in a panic and has court looming

next week 22nd march,and needs help big time.

 

mikeb

Link to post
Share on other sites

LBA stands for letter before action quidsinn.

its the last chance for them to settle before court proceedings are raised.

Hope this helps.

Jacky

 

Thanks..... (how stupid am I) I wasnt going to send them any further letters, I had advised them in my original letter they had 14 days or i was proceeding down the legal road, lets face it they dont send out any further letters to the customer once they advise that they will be debiting a charge.....rather than mess around it is my intention to lodge the legal papers immeadiatly after the initial 14days are up which is next Thursday.

 

I'm going to go down the English system can anyone advise where is the best place to hire a mailing address???? Will a PO Box from the Post Office be suffice?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask a few questions mainly to sort of summarise this thread (in my own head)?

From my understanding of this thread:

Other banks are likely to follow CB and we'll witness perhaps an increase of Courts rejecting multiple claims throughout Scotland?

I’ve just served a decree (awarded by the Court via Summary Cause) on BoS for just over 1.5K (two accounts) and I now wish to pursue them for a total of £3,416.15 in respect of another account. With this in mind and for such a sum above the Summary Cause limit of 1.5K I should write to the banks as normal with LBA?

Thereafter it would appear that (when I get the inevitable refusal) I should approach the FOS, who appears to be sympathetic to our cause and will not support the banks' claims that their charges are reasonable -- this would circumvent the need to go via Ordinary Action? Posts from Flash and Robert XC seem to indicate that this may be the case.

Best to await the outcome of Sneaky Pete’s case for guidance?

Regards,

Ian P of Edinburgh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thought has occurred to me – we have not lost in the past and are unlikely to lose in the near future a propos illegal bank charges. Thanks to the templates on this and other sites the paperwork is all but done and dusted to enable we lay persons to claim our money back from the banks.

With this in mind, and considering just how little work he or she would have to do, why doesn’t some “tame and friendly” lawyer cash in on this goldmine and take on Ordinary Action cases on a “no-win-no-fee” basis? This moreso as losing is not currently an option.

Of course they’ll take a hefty fee, but I for one would rather get back 70 per cent of a 3.5K claim than 0 per cent of any claim.

Discuss?

Ian P of Edinburgh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excuse my ignorance and without trawling the threads can someone advise me what is LBA

 

Unfortunately, this is a 'self help' forum, and trawling of the threads is something that must be done, to familiarise one's self with the in's and out's of the process.

Too many people are jumping in and making mistakes, and the same questions are being repeated over and over again, Thank goodness for the more patient members who answer these questions.

There are FAQ's ~~> http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/, Step-by-step instructions ~~> http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-example-step-step-instructions.html, and if anyone had read the FAQ's they would have noticed in a nice wee box ~~> http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31052-contact-details-banks.html.

 

My apologies for hijacking your thread George, maybe im just having one of those days..........

Link to post
Share on other sites

FYI,

 

Appointing a lawyer will always cost you something. You never get all your expenses back in court or through settlement. Expect to have to pay 1/3 of your legal costs if you win and all your own and 2/3 of theirs if you lose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FYI,

 

Appointing a lawyer will always cost you something. You never get all your expenses back in court or through settlement. Expect to have to pay 1/3 of your legal costs if you win and all your own and 2/3 of theirs if you lose.

Exactly. The big myth surrounding 'no win no fee' is that if you lose it costs you nothing. At best all it merans is that you won't have to pay your agent - it doesn't however protect you from having to pay the banks costs - which could well be ruinous. We've talked about this a lot with a number of lawyers, including the Govan Law Centre. The advice is always the same - advise your members to stay well away from Ordinary Cause.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in Scotland (haggis, neeps & tatties and wear kilt all day:razz: )

 

My claim is with BoS, not CB fortunately! However, it will not be long before other banks follow suit I think.

 

My scenario is;

SAR sent - BoS only supplied part of statements within 40 days (charges on supplied statements came to just over £1200). Still waiting on remainder of statements.

Submitted Prelim.

 

When I manage to crowbar the rest of the statements from BoS and I go to make another claim (which I think will be less than £750), do you think if they stated that I should have claimed in one lot, my defence could be that the claims were based on how they sent the statements?

 

Any thoughts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi needrevenge, i know what your saying but the answer is defin NO, i said this to the BIGYIN at court and was told that i should have waited until i had all my statements before raising court proceedings as i KNEW or SHOULD have KNOWN that there were other charges to be claimed.

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HBOS has charged in total over £2800 over the last 6 years and I've split that into 4 seperate refunds and done them seperately to avoid it going Summery Casue. HBOS has already sent me 2 cheques for the first £1400. I'm currently on my 3rd court case against HBOS (which the Kilmarnock Sheriff Court accepted) but the bank has sent me a letter which has been worded differently to that of any other letters they've sent me.

 

It reads:

 

"I note that you have previously had two payments in respect of your complaint regarding bank charges on your account therefore I am unable to agree to your request for a further refund."

 

The return date is next Friday (23/03/07) and the hearing date is 30/03/07. Is this just another scare tactic from them?

I guess I should contact them to acknowledge this but what should I say in my letter to them?

 

Any help would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds a little ominous to me. Sounds like HBOS may be following Clydesdales example. Which court was your claim filed at?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...