Announcements
-
-
Tweets
-
Posts
-
By Tiara.Smile · Posted
Hello, I have not posted in a while because I haven’t gotten any reasonable update yet. From my previous post, I went into a branch and took along statement from my bank in Nigeria where I sent money from, statement from the third party apps I used, documents showing proof of source of funds to my Nigerian bank account, a letter from my Nigerian solicitor all notarized because the funds in my Nigerian account was from a property I sold. I included documents of the property, approved drawing plans, transfer agreement when I bought the land, pictures of the construction stages till I completed the construction of the house back in Nigeria, sale agreement drafted by my lawyer. Everything was included. so I took it all to the bank, they called the fraud department in my presence and I was told to email the documents myself to [email protected] as they were much. I was told it will take at least 15 working days to get a feedback. I sent it all on 5th of April. And I called the fraud team (I was given a number to call for updates) on 12th of April and they said they didn’t get the documents I sent earlier. I sent them again that day. So today I called in again and was told to wait for the 15 working days to hear for them. I will like to note something I heard while I was on call with them on 5th of April. The lady said they didn’t get the files I sent and told me to hold on while she checks with the team, then I heard her whispering to maybe her colleague saying “let them know he wants to pursue this” So were they expecting me to leave over £10k in a closed account and not sure any access to my funds? It all sounds like they expect to close the account and I should just accept my fate. well that’s all I have now. Thank you. Doc_by_Scan_Shot.pdf -
That is all that was received, nothing else in the envelope or previously apart from a letter from DCB asking to get in touch with them with an offer for settlement -
Hi all I just stumbled upon this forum, we've had a PCN through, and thought I'd consult with the experts before I take any action! Hopefully I've filled this all out correctly so you can see everything you need, but let me know if not and I'll try to sort it out. Thanks in advance for your help! 1 Date of the infringement 04/04/24 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 10/04/24 [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s 3 Date received 13/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up n/a 7 Who is the parking company? Euro Car Parks 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Solent Retail Havant Car Park, PO9 1ND For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA ECP_Notice.pdf -
By honeybee13 · Posted
As I said, his case sat around at CCHQ for three months. It sounds as if they're trying to string them out from the previous misdemeanour/sacking. -
By honeybee13 · Posted
Do you have anything other than the N180 and that letter? We know what an N180 looks like. HB
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
-
Our picks
-
If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,
If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.-
- 1 reply
-
-
Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld
ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,
Hello,
On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.
Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom. Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm. They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.
The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.
I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.
Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done.
Many thanks-
- 81 replies
-
-
A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report
WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,
Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299-
- 161 replies
-
-
Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available
BankFodder posted a post in a topic,
We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.
The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.
Frankly I don't think that is any accident.
One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.
Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.
We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
This is good ethical practice.
It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.
OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
-
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
style="text-align: center;">
Thread Locked
because no one has posted on it for the last 6169 days.
If you need to add something to this thread then
Please click the "Report " link
at the bottom of one of the posts.
If you want to post a new story then
Please
Start your own new thread
That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help
Thanks
-
Recently Browsing 0 Caggers
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Have we helped you ...?
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
Recommended Posts