Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

helpless woman in need of sum advice!!!!


raffy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6261 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

im in need of sum essential advice recently i purchased a psp console from comet,to be exact it was 23,12,06 so pleased to buy this as had been searching for ages and as xmas!...but....it stopped working alas i thought i still have the receipt and under a year old,but..according to comet as it was just over the 28 day mark had to be sent back to sony with myself arranging this!ok so ive purchased an item from a shop and im having to arrange collection,two days later i received from sony a new psp,or so i thought it was in french drawn all over and stopped working like the last one,i contacted sony once again they appologised saying it was straight from the manufactuers and sometimes one slipps through the net!!!!???two days later i recieve another psp and yet again stopped working!!tomorow ill be on buzby again to sony!is there anything i can do???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Comet should not have sent you back to the manufacturer. Under the Sale of Goods Act they have to arrange a repair or replacement for you.

 

I would advise you to go straight back to Comet now, state that you obtained a replacement from the manufacturer on their advice but it was faulty and therefore you would now like to rescind the contract and claim a refund.

 

Rescission of the contract is basically a partial refund less an amount for any wear and tear you have had from the product. As we are talking about a very short time of actual use here, you should push for a full refund.

 

(NB, note that if people choose to go back to the manufacturer under the guarantee and get a replacement, often they will lose their Sale of Goods rights against the retailer as they will effectively have a different product to the one that the retailer originally sold them. However on this occasion since you did so on their advice, it should not have an effect).

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have been phoned comets headoffice who says they allow 28 days from the receipt date,they gave me sonys headoffice number to call,i then asked where the advertisement of this 28 day rule was as i didnt see it anywhere within there store except when i turned the receipt over and was on the back,i also informed them id be speaking to trading standards,the reply was we work closely with trading standards,i emailed trading standards ysterday,still awaiting a response,all i am getting off everybody is its comets policy after 28 days to be returned to sony,i have always been under the impression if you purchase goods of any description they should be returned,or repaired to the same quality,im simply not getting this......

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can tell Comet that they are liable to repair or replace your goods under the Sale of Goods Act and they cannot fob you off to the manufacturer. Tell them that you have had the item replaced on their advice and it has failed, therefore they are liable to you under the Sale of Goods Act and you are seeking to rescind the contract and claim a full refund.

 

Comet are indeed trying harder to work with Trading Standards departments, certainly that is the message they are getting over, however it does seem there is some way to go before they actually understand what their responsibilities are (even though they probably have already been advised).

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i then asked where the advertisement of this 28 day rule was as i didnt see it anywhere within there store except when i turned the receipt over and was on the back

 

If they are attempting to limit you to 28 days for returning faulty goods (as opposed to buyer's remorse) then not only can they not do it, but they are committing an offence.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

im going in there tomorow what happens if they will not give myself a refund.what would be the next step? the two lots of responses i got was this 28 day thingy then to be sent back to manufactuer,like my freind said what happens if her telle went wrong shed have to wait as long as i have for the decent and acceptable goods that were purchased,

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are attempting to limit you to 28 days for returning faulty goods (as opposed to buyer's remorse) then not only can they not do it, but they are committing an offence.

 

I think you'll find that is an addition to your statuatory rights - they have a no quibble (supposedly) returns policy up to 28 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

im going in there tomorow what happens if they will not give myself a refund.what would be the next step? the two lots of responses i got was this 28 day thingy then to be sent back to manufactuer,like my freind said what happens if her telle went wrong shed have to wait as long as i have for the decent and acceptable goods that were purchased,

 

rosiecotton has given you the correct advice and you should do precisely as she has advised.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

been into comet,no joy!!!!!stated what says on receipt about if they cannot repair the goods they will offer an exchange or refund bit,no!they contacted sony whilst i was there i ended up talking to them,stating my complaint,i was told they realiseits an inconvenience to me!understatement,waiting for their supervisor to phone me,and headoffice at comet to phone me,as i said this 28 day thingy does affect my statatory rights to which reply was it dosent,from where im standing it does!as it should be repaired,it isnt!or a refund which hasnt been offered,the irony of all this is my original psp hasnt been repaired at all ive been given a reconditioned one instead!and in french written over,then accept another one which then stops,and now sony going to do an investigation if they send another one out!!!!cannot believe this mess,its so stressful; if theres anyone who can give me any advice however small over this id be very gratefull,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you write to Comet immediately along these lines:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Faulty Sony PSP

 

On [Date] I purchased a Sony PSP from your store. On [date] this product became faulty because [detail the faults that you experienced]. Therefore the PSP is not of satisfactory quality nor fit for its purpose, and does not comply with the terms of the Sale of Goods Act.

 

I went into your store to complain and was told that as it was outside the 28 days I had to go to the manufacturer. Therefore on your advice I contacted Sony and they replaced the PSP for me. However the replacement item was also not of satisfactory quality because [detail the problems].

 

I have followed your advice and obtained a replacement item but this is still not satisfactory. Therefore, under the Sale of Goods Act, I am rescinding my contract for the PSP and claiming a refund. I have had no reasonable use from this item so the refund should be the full amount that I paid for it (see enclosed copy of receipt).

 

You are liable to remedy this situation under the Sale of Goods Act as my contract is with you as the retailer. You cannot force me to deal with the manufacturer and if you continue to suggest that I do so I will inform my local Trading Standards department.

 

I am making time of the essence and if you do not arrange for my money to be refunded to me by [give them a reasonable date, say 2 weeks] I will be taking further action, in the small claims court if necessary.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

*****

 

I hope this helps.

 

How did you pay for the PSP?

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well!!!!didnt have to wait long for headoffice to phone me,they did today went into my local store and picked up my new psp!!!! may be only a psp but i am well overjoyed!!!!!!! many many thanks to rosie cotton,and everyone else who helped me,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Raffy! (and well done rosiecotton too!)

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick thought....and more on the technical side.

 

As you have had several different units failing after a day or two, is it possible, its batteries are not being charged properly? A colleague of mine had exactly the same problem with a Nokia mobile phone. In the end it turned out he had poor wiring in the mains socket that he plugged his charger into. As it was the same socket all the time, he only discovered it when successfully charged up his 3rd replacement phone at work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sony did say about the charger,but dont use the same power point (u did have a good point thou)when i went into comet on thurs they phoned sony up and sony did say if i know someone around to see if their battery worked with my unit,but as id had enough did say i wasnt prepared to do this as its not my job to run around anymore,already used my phone bill to phone comet and sony up.at the end of the day all i could see was id purchased something with receipt,and id gone down their route of being prepared to get it fixed,(as it stated on the receipt)and was not getting what i paid for,and after a phon call it was one that had -slipped through the net from the manufactuer,the last one i dont know,but,you did have a good point and i do understand some people do use the same outlet through habit or convenience,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...