Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

catmaddy v Yorkshire Bank Plc


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6210 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, welcome and good luck. Take your time to read through all the FAQs and if you need any info there are plenty of people around who will give you all the help and advice you need. There are some fantastic people on here who have been there and done it.

 

40 days and counting

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for your welcomes and good wishes. I have been reading everything I can find on this site for a week now and after lengthy discussions with my husband (joint account) we decided to go ahead and fight our corner.

 

I am very indecisive in nature and even though I might be doing everything right I tend to need reassurance so I will be looking for help and reassurance from you all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome catmaddy.

 

Keep us informed and good luck.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi catmaddy and welcome. I'm sure you will have worked out that YB are not the easiest to fight, but if you stand firm and ignore the intimidation you will win. You will certainly get plenty of moral, as well as practical support here, so don't be deterred.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi catmaddy,i sent for my statements over 40 days ago just today received them but only for one year as they sent a letter telling of some change they made to the system in 2005 and i have to wait a bit longer for the rest so this may or may not happen to you i will let you know when the rest arrive,on checking just the one year it is already up to £800 one month alone i was charged £280 ! good luck..Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Carolyn - Cashed my cheque yesterday (Thursday) - nothing yet. Will post when anything new.

 

Andy - Thanks for your good wishes. Hope it all goes OK for you. Will keep you posted.

 

Clare

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update: Received today, 13.3.07, acknowledgement letter (from Advice Quality Unit, Wade Lane, Leeds) stating they have 40 days in which to provide me with the information and will forward this in due course.

 

Also confirmed receipt of £10.00 fee.

 

State that manual intervention is not covered by DPA and are under no statutory obligation to record or provide this information.

 

The standard reply.

 

It has taken them 14 days to respond to my original request. 26 days and counting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Update: Received 6/4/07 a letter from Yorkshire Bank Advice Quality Unit - Charges Section dated 4/4/07.

 

I refer to our previous correspondence acknowledging receipt of your request for details of charges and/or statements relating to your bank account(s).

 

Within the terms of the Data Protection Act 1998 we have 40 days in which to provide you with the information we hold. The end of this time period has almost been reached, however, due to the high volume of requests we have received in relation to this high profile issue, I regret that we are not yet able to provide you with the information requested.

 

Whilst you are within your rights to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner at the end of the 40 day period, I confirm that we shall provide you with the information as soon as we possibly can.

 

I thank you for your continued patience and understanding in this matter.

 

Yours sincerely

 

T.G. Rayner

 

Advice Quality Unit - Charges Section

 

Their last paragraph infuriated me :mad: .

 

Where was the Yorkshire Bank's patience and understanding when I asked them to lay off the bank charges as I could not feed my family and had to rely on hand outs from family members (the mother in law)?

 

I have my complaint ready for the Information Commissioner and just need to get photocopies of the relevant bits.

 

Anything further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Clare

 

I got the same letter from them and then they all came the day after the 40 days was up. When's your 40 days up? How many days over the 40 are they now?

Just got the lovely task of going through all my statements now, though the ones I have gone through aren't as lucrative as I was hoping lol :cool:

 

Carolyn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Carolyn

 

Soz, forgot to put in last post - 40 days were up yesterday, 9th April, so I suppose there is still a chance I will get them soon. Good luck with going through your statements. Will keep you posted.

 

Clare

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update: Have today, 14th April, receive bank statements from February 2001 to June 2005 with a letter saying they are coming from two different sources and that the others should arrive shortly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Catmaddy

I am at the same stage as you are. I just got the second letter today about not meeting forty day deadline. Did you send your complaint and a letter to them after the 40 days or did the statements arrive before you did this. I am in two minds really I am on day 36 but when it gets to day 40 I dont really want to leave it as they seem to be a real pain having read through a few threads. On the other hand alot of work if they are likely to turn up a day or two after.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi twosue

 

I had my form completed for the Information Commissioner but was waiting until I went back to work on Monday 15th (had a week off with the kids) to photocopy the relevant correspondence. It took them 45 days to send copies from 2001 - 2005. I will probably wait until mid week next week, as they say 2005 to present are on their way shortly from a different source.

 

I have just gone through 2001 - 2005 and highlighted all charges and entered these onto a spreadsheet ready for my letter to the Yorkshire requesting my charges back.

 

Good luck with your claim and keep us informed.

 

Clare.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long ago did you open your account catmaddy? If it's more than 6 years you should get the earlier info too. The SAR asks for the history and doesn't limit it to 6 years.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long ago did you open your account catmaddy? If it's more than 6 years you should get the earlier info too. The SAR asks for the history and doesn't limit it to 6 years.

 

Hi Caro

 

Not sure of the exact date when account opened but it was around 1993/94. I have been reading on site about claiming for more than 6 years. It looks like YB are only sending out statements for the last 6 years.

 

It did state in my SAR that we were requesting a complete list of transactions and charges relating to our banking history with YB. YB did respond and say they would comply with my request. I will write to YB stating that they have not yet fully complied with my request as I require statements from when account opened up to 2001.

 

We are probably going to have to split this claim into two as from 2001 to 2005 we are already nearing £4,000, then there is the 8% interest added when we take them to court (which is extremely likely) and we want to got through the small claims. Any info would be greatly appreciated.

 

Clare

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be very cautious about splitting the claim as it has caused problems in Scotland, and I wouldn't be surprised if it might in England and Wales too in future. The risk of going over £5,000 and outside the small claims track is probably less than the risk of splitting the claim in my opinion.

 

If you haven't done so already, read the stickys that have been put at the top of this forum, primarily by BankFodder and you'll see the best way to proceed there, especially in light of the Whistleblower programme.

 

Take a look, and if you have any questions as a result post them and we'll try to help.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Clare,

 

Caro is right there is nothing to be scared of in using fast track. A claim for 37K was paid out yesterday (not YB). If anything the banks are more scared of fast track because of the disclosure rules.

 

If you split the claim there is a chance that the second claim will be struck out as an abuse of process.

 

All the best

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...