Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Any Advice???


Tiffla
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6264 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, Peeps.

I got into trouble with my Barclaycard a few years back.

Basically, I just buried my head in the sand and hoped it would go away – it didn’t!

I’ve been chased by a company called FIRE (financial investigations and recoveries (Europe) ltd).

I received a letter last week saying I owe £1,260 ish, but their client (Cabot Financial) is prepared to accept a full and final settlement figure of £630 ish.

Pretty good deal I thought, and I am now in a position to pay it off once and for all.

But, does that mean I won’t be able to reclaim charges that Barclaycard hit me with?

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you pay it off you can still reclaim the charges they have levied to your account. It is up to you to send a full SAR. I would also check that they have not entered a default against your credit file, if they have then I would seek to have this removed from my credit file with all the CRA's.

 

If you want some info on this see my Cr@p 1 thread as I am in the process of doing this, but you need to state this from the outset ie prelim stage.

 

Heres the link to my thread: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/51318-tanzarelli-cap-one-default.html

 

HTH

Tanz

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI there,

my understanding is if the company has offered you a settlement that you must subtract the amount they have taken off from what you are claiming. isnt that right.

ie im about to make a claim against Capital one also and at one point after i had fines after fines that took me £800 over my original limit. They then refunded me that £800 supposedly to help me get back within my credit limit. Now when i get statements and add up charges £800 will have to be taken off the final claim total.

 

Jade :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI there,

my understanding is if the company has offered you a settlement that you must subtract the amount they have taken off from what you are claiming. isnt that right.

ie im about to make a claim against Capital one also and at one point after i had fines after fines that took me £800 over my original limit. They then refunded me that £800 supposedly to help me get back within my credit limit. Now when i get statements and add up charges £800 will have to be taken off the final claim total.

 

Jade :-)

 

Hi jade i think you missread the original post as it was mentioned that the DCA was willing to accept a F&F settlement they were not offering a settlement.

 

However yes if a bank refunds you anything then you need to either accept it as partial settlement or if before you file they refund then you need to ammend your claim accordingly.

 

Tanz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response.

 

Let me get this right though......

 

Barclaycard sold my debt to Cabot, and then they sold it to another DCA?

 

Or are they just acting on their behalf?

 

Is this just a case of who can be bothered to chase it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response.

 

Let me get this right though......

 

Barclaycard sold my debt to Cabot, and then they sold it to another DCA?

 

Or are they just acting on their behalf?

 

Is this just a case of who can be bothered to chase it?

 

These types of debts do sometimes get passed around, for example some like debitas are part of Capital One but then if they have no joy the may sell it on to someone like Lowell Portfolio who are blood s*ckers, who pass it down the chain to Lowell Financial who seem to be the ones doing the donkey work etc.

 

Strange world eh?

 

Tanz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoa there guys

 

Some slight confusion could arise here methinks.

 

If you owe and they offer to accept a lesser amount thats their problem. They gain a benefit by getting the lump sum earlier rather than waiting for you to pay the sum over a number of years.

 

When you claim back your charges you do so in the full amount.

 

Strange but true, so far Barclaycard, abbey and MBNA have coughed up in this way for me.

 

Only MBNA raised the issue of the short settlement, i guess they weren't expecting me to laugh at them when i told them i was quite comfortable with my position in that respect and they could counter claim if they wished.

 

They paid out in full.

 

So in answer to the queries pay the debt and get the benifit, then claim back all your charges

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoa there guys

 

Some slight confusion could arise here methinks.

 

If you owe and they offer to accept a lesser amount thats their problem. They gain a benefit by getting the lump sum earlier rather than waiting for you to pay the sum over a number of years.

 

When you claim back your charges you do so in the full amount.

 

Strange but true, so far Barclaycard, abbey and MBNA have coughed up in this way for me.

 

Only MBNA raised the issue of the short settlement, i guess they weren't expecting me to laugh at them when i told them i was quite comfortable with my position in that respect and they could counter claim if they wished.

 

They paid out in full.

 

So in answer to the queries pay the debt and get the benifit, then claim back all your charges

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

 

Thats another way of looking at it, I was thinkin ignore the debt but state account in dispute thus avoiding restarting statute barring clock, then claim charges (including those from DCA) back and deal with whats left.

 

Or is that the long way around?

 

What if you cant afford to pay the debt, but the DCA is still charging you? You claim from credit card company and then do you need to then also statr a seperate claim against the DCA?

 

Tanz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tanz

 

im not sure there are issues re the possibilty of being statute barred, that doesnt come across for the OP to me at least.

 

Also the OP did say they cold afford to settle the debt now at that rate.

 

I guess that if there are issues over the debt generally and the claimant cant afford to pay then i agree the route may be different as you suggest.

 

Maybe i misread the OP 1st post because i took it that in general they belive they owe the moeny and can pay the offer made.

 

 

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...