Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Megy vs Natwest


megy34
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6101 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OK all, its now been just over 14 days since I sent the LBA, the next step is to file a claim or whatever, with the spreadsheet printout but to include the interest at 8%, how do i work this out, is there something in the excel sheet i am missing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Here is a list of all the fees. So you can see how much yours will be.

 

County Court Fees

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks all for the good advice up till now, unfortunately due to personal reasons i was unable to carry forward with this claim, but i am back on track now and have just completed the court forms and printed them out.

 

The only bit of confusion i have in this is the last box, where it makes reference to claimants solicitors firm, as i am not using a solicitors i assume i just leave this and any other reference to it blank.

 

I also seem to remember reading somewhere on this site, but cant find it now that you can request the fees be refunded in a cheque as oppose to being just paid into the relevant account, where do i need to state this or how do i request it?

 

Thanks again, looking to get the claim forms in the post today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just put 'not applicable' where it asks for name of claimant's solicitor. With regards to cheque payment request, if you can squeeze it into the POC - you may be able to add a '5d) The claimant requests full payment by cheque. Might work! ;)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have just read on some other sites that all actions, including that of county courts/small claims courts, have or will be suspended.

 

I sent my claim forms off on saturday, including the cheque to pay for the action, and note that the cheque has not been paid in yet, what is anyones advice to me in this case, would i be best to put a stop on the cheque, or phone the courts to see what they are doing?

 

I am reading several different reports and am getting confused as to what is happening, what will happen, what i need to/not need to do?

 

I am sure i am not the only person to ask, but i am at a stage that i think might be critical.

 

PLEASE ADVISE ANYONE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Megy, the advice is to continue to proceed with your claim as normal. Please read the link attached to my signature for further clarification of this. You may possibly find that your local court places a stay on your case - and if this happens we can support you to apply to have this removed. For the moment though - don't worry as it's business as usual ;)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TOTALLY CONFUDDLED NOW!!!

 

I have been reading the various threads on this site and across some other websites, and I am now totally confused as to what is happening or is likely to happen in respect to my claim.

 

I sent the claim form and list of charges(inc interest) to the bank a few weeks ago, after a week i phoned to see what had happened, cheque not presented etc, and they said they hadnt had the forms, so I sent it all again end of last week, check my online banking and see that the cheque got taken from my account today, confirming that the forms have been recieved this time around.

 

Would the courts still bank this cheque if there was an automatic stay applied to all claims? Is there or is there not an automatic stay applied to all claims? Will my claim get so far and then the judge apply a stay due to the OFT/FOS test case? Will my bank now be even more dismissive of the claim I have filed against them?

 

I appreciate everyone has lots of questions, but it seems I have sent my claim form in and had the cheque paid in a particularly difficult spell in the whole bank vs anyone scenario. Is this just my (as usual) bad luck, or would no one really batt an eyelid and worry about something else instead.

 

Obviously I havent heard anything from the court and with all the postal disruption at the moment things could be delayed.

 

I guess I am just looking for some case specific advice as i am just confusing myself even more with everything i read.

 

Thanks again in advance, I know I am being thick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Each court is handling bank charge claims in their own way - some are staying cases, others aren't. If you file a claim at court - yes, they'll bank the cheque and proces the claim. It's later down the line that cobbetts would apply for a stay - and it would be up to the judge who looks at your case to decide whether or not to grant it.

 

It's incredibly difficult for everyone with pending claims at the moment as nobody is sure whether their case will be stayed or not - it's a horrible situation. But it's basically a waiting game right now to see what happens next with your claim.

 

Keep us posted - and best of luck x :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have sent my LBA off some time ago now and contacted Natwest to find out if they had received it.

 

They told me they have 40 days to make an offer... this will expire tomorrow!!! I called Natwest today to find out what is going on and got told about the "Stay"

 

My question is... Do I send a cheque for my claim and persue the claim through the courts or hold fire??? Natwest told me it could be years till this was resolved at which point I laughted at him and hung up the phone!!

 

Where do I stand and what should I do??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Hedgey, you are certainly living up to your title 'site helper' as you are clearing things up for me.

 

I had some post waiting for me when i got home, the notice of issue from the court, do i assume the bit in brackets (unspecified amount) is just a standard for the form, there is no mention on the notice to stay how much i am claiming from Natwest, I assume the notice they sent to Natwest will be different and will have the amount on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Megy, under 'Notice of Isuue', are you sure it says 'unspecified amount' in the brackets?

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes,

 

It has:

'notice of issue'

(unspecified amount)

To the claimant

 

then a box with my address in it then the dates of when it was issued and when the defendant has untill it needs to reply.

 

Looking at the claim form i might have missed the amount claimed/court fee in the bottom box, dont know if i missed it on all forms or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I only asked as mine said 'specified amount' under the Notice of Issue. On your N1 claim form, have you included the charges where indicated on the guidance note (e.g., on the front page under 'Value' and in the box at the bottom right hand corner, plus in section 5 on the second page)??

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under value i did yes, in section 5 I entered the seperate amounts, but in the box in the bottom rh corner of page 1 i dont have it on the one i have, so i think i will have left it off the other ones too. Is this a problem, or a slight oversight?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Slight oversight - don't worry, it isn't as though you haven't put the figures on the form at all! Phone the court on Monday morning to explain - but it should be fine. ;)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I have in the last 2 days recieved an offer from the bank, for £98 less than my original claim(before interest and court fees).

 

The letter I recieved mentions all the test case stuff and that if the case goes to court they will apply for a stay etc etc.

 

My current thoughts are that I am more incined to accept this offer with there being so much unknown at the mo with this test case.

 

What do others think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just phoned Luton court, and they said that they are staying all cases on their own initiative without any application from the bank, apparently I will be getting a letter to confirm this. All outstanding and new cases will be stayed untill 31st march 2008 at the earliest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi megy, I've just sent you a message. x :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...