Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

thenanny v HSBC!! ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6063 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You can start again, but couldn't add the 8% on until the court stage. Alternatively you could work out how much it is, including the interest and suggest to HSBC that they might like to include that sum with their settlement on your other claim. It's worth a shot.

 

How come you had 2 claims on the go at the same time by the way? It's a wonder they weren't combined.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 244
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Basically my claims were too big to go together so were sent seperatley. Hence I have another court date in Aug.

 

This 3rd claim I have only just found the statements for so will whack that in the post today to HSBC and see what comes back.

 

jo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

What a ball ache trying to get my cheque out of HSBC!!!

 

They sent a cheque, put it in A&L account which they then lost! Rang HSBC and asked them tostop it and put money straight into account for me, which they wouldnt do, only at their convenience. Very frustrating as we were going away and needed it!!! Grrr. A&L have had full blown bollocking as they put charges on my account for a chq they lost!

 

Just got back off Holiday to hear from hubbies workmate that OFT are stooping all on-going claims???? What the hecks going on? I'm sposed to be in court again on the 17th Aug, which Noddy has conveniently told in a post, is still going ahead. Not heard anything off DG at all.

 

Jo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok after spending all day yesterday printing a damn court bundle off for posting today, I recieved a letter from DG this morning.

 

It states that they will be applying to the Court to stay my action intil resoloution of the banks proceedings with the OFT.

 

I gather this is a very standard letter that they are sending out at the mo, should I still send the court bundle? Should I ring them court and check or will I be notified by them before next Friday?

 

Jo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Carry on with your court bundle as normal! Also read up on the removal of stay application. you need to get this sent in upon notification from the court that a stay has been granted.

Noddy is really knowledgable with regards to the stay's and also auburngreeneyes is now knowledgeable on what is needed!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Application for removal of staty

 

Have a read of this thread right through! It has some good advice along the way together with links for the documents needed. Another thread with alot of good advice on the stays is on the "news from cardiff "thread!

 

It does all get a bit mind numbing after a while!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right well the next Court bundle was osted on Thursday but havent heard anything from DG as yet.

 

Thought they might have replied with their snotty letters today.

 

Does this mean they think they are in a good place to put a stay on my court date?

 

Will let you know tomorrow if I hear anything. Court is on Friday at 2pm.

 

JO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aww yes please!

 

Hopefully it wont get to that, will print off a letter reoving stay just in case i get to court and they say the banks been in touch.

 

Sperkesister is going on smae day too but hasnt replied to my pm about what time due in court.

 

How r u doing??

 

jo

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am waiting, as I tpye, for Jason Newbold to ring me with an offer (DG).

 

Have a quick look st my thread from last week!

 

No problem with Friday let me know details and I will meet you as arranged before. Don't think it will come to that tho'.

 

Dont worry - we will sort it.

 

Chris:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I have a letter from the courts this morning saying that my case has been STAYED. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

 

So as I have only just got in and read this I better go read up on what I do next.

 

This is a pigging nuisance as could do withthe money NOW! damn bathroom flooded this morning cos stupid overflow pipe had come out of tank and the ballcock had not worked properly! Lovely wet bathroom now, nice.

 

At least I dont have to attend court on our wedding anniversary, hehe.

 

JO

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok here si the stay removal thread..........http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/108935-courts-stays.html

 

here is the letter I sent in with my request:

 

09.08.2007

Claim Reference Number 7QZ45507

Dear Sir,

 

Claim Number7QZ45507

 

 

please find attached Forms N244 in relation to the above mentioned case along with supporting documents. I would respectfully request that these are passed to the Judge for the allocation of a hearing date.

 

 

 

 

My concerns in relation to this are set out in my part C statement attached as I really do believe that this stay would not maintain the status quo, as this stay favours the bank’s by preventing the claimant’s pursuit of its legitimate remedy without placing any restrictions on the bank’s activities whatsoever and allowing them to further abuse the court process.

They had no intention of defending this case in court as they have not done so thus far and believe they are using the OFT test case in the same manner. By requesting stays quoting the test case they further delaying and abusing the court system for the bank’s own gain.

The claimant is strongly opposed to such a stay, upon the basis that the defendant, both during and prior to this litigation, has ignored all prior attempts by the claimant to narrow the issues in dispute, or otherwise engage in meaningful dialogue which may have facilitated an amicable settlement to these matters.

Attached is part C is my supporting evidence with this regards

 

Yours Sincerely

and here is the 1 manic sent........

Re: Manicblonde V Hsbc

Here is a copy of the covering letter I am sending with my forms. Do you think its a bit strong?

 

Dear Sir,

 

Claim Number xxxxxxxxxxxx and Claim Number xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

Please find attached Forms N244 in relation to both of the above mentioned cases along with supporting documents. I would respectfully request that these are passed to Judge Hickinbottom for his decision in this matter urgently.

 

Would you also please confirm that in light of there being over 600 of these cases that were listed for the 14th August, how it is now proposed the judge is going to be able to give each of the 600 cases the consideration it deserves rather than the use of a Blanket stay as per the directions of The Master of the Rolls as quoted below;

 

 

"Following a request from the OFT and the banks to put a stay on all Bank Charges cases (i.e. to halt them until the test case is finished); the Master of the Rolls decided not to issue an order staying all outstanding cases.

Instead he asked the Deputy Head of Civil Justice to write to all Designated Civil Judges, (which he has done) inviting them to consider staying outstanding claims on a case by case basis as appropriate.

Designated Civil Judges are the senior circuit judge responsible for a group of courts. (S)he may agree arrangements with the district judges sitting at each individual court. Therefore whether as case is stayed or not is a matter for the Judge in the individual case."

 

My concerns in relation to this are set out in my part C statement attached as I really do believe that this stay would not maintain the status quo, as this stay favours the bank by preventing the claimant’s pursuit of its legitimate remedy without placing any restrictions on the banks activities whatsoever.

 

Please note that I am unsure of what fees if any need to accompany these forms and therefore please contact me xxxxxxxxxx if fees are required in order to process these forms and I will ensure that payment is made forthwith.

 

 

use either or make your own with the bits from each one you fancy...........

 

andremember TO ASK FOR A HEARING. for the stay removal.........

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

ok, no word form Court after sending in letter and form to stop the stay.

 

Has anyone else had anything back? feel like I'm being ignored and this is all pointless at mo.

 

God I need this money ! so in the crap at the mo. Need this while I'm off work with my back op!

 

j

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...