Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Recall Charges - Can They Be claimed??


Tiffla
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6155 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, People.

Still very new to this site although i am about to file my MCOL against FD.

 

The story so far

 

Received my statements, no problems at all (and free).

 

Sent my first letter requesting my money back (£2,000+).

 

FD offered me £600+ also saying that they are not prepared to consider claims for unpaid direct debits.

 

Sent off my LBA asking for the full amount but gave them the option of settling quickly for £1800.

 

After looking at my statements again, i realised that i hadn't claimed for any "overdraft fees", only the "excess overdraft fees" and "recalled s/o - d/d".

 

So, i wrote again asking for the higher amount of just under £3000 but again offered to settle quickly for £2800.

 

They replied to this by offering me £1400+ and still maintained that they do not look to refund recall fees. (this is almost half of my claim).

 

I wrote Mr. Kenaghan and accepted thier offer only as part payment, but i would be persuing the remainder through the courts and informed them that i would be filing my MCOL on 23rd of this month (today).

 

To my surprise this morning, i received yet another offer from FD for £1680+ which is a full refund of all my overdraft fees. But they still maintain that they do not review recall fees.

 

As my fingers are twitching over the MCOL site, i just wondered if anyone else has been fobbed off with this refusal to repay recall fees?

 

Shall i just go for it and claim the lot through the courts?

 

Any advice would be a great help.

 

Will keep you all posted!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tiffa,

 

I filed my MCOL last week. FD gave me the same line about DD recall fees, and I decided to got the whole hog. The way I figure it is it can't cost them £37.50 per failed direct debit, therefore the charge is unlawful.

They made me two offers which weren't even 50% of my claim, now I've added 8% to my claim, and instead of them being able to settle for £3000, it's nearer £5000!

 

Stick with it

 

Dub

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

First Direct - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 29/12/06

Statements recieved 15/1/07 - >£3000 owed

Prelim sent 16.01.07

Partial offer received 01.02.2007

LBA and letter rejecting paltry offer sent 02.02.2007

MCOL filed mid Feb 07

AQ 26th March

 

 

BoS - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 29/12/06

Statements received 1.02.2007 - Prelim sent 02.02.2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i just clarify something please? Can you reclaim Overdraft fees?? or is it just excess OD Fees?

 

Many thanks

First Direct - LBA sent 12/03/07

GE Capital/GE Money SAR request sent 15/02/07 - 4 Accounts -Prelim sent 30/03/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was fobbed off twice with lower offers and the "not prepared to refund recall fees" argument, but in the end I sent them a letter saying I was going to pursue the full amount and they had 7 days to respond and avoid a court case. They paid up within 4 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

I have just received the same reply from First Direct saying that thay will not pay recall charges and my claim is for £3308- the recall charges make up £1200 of that.I did't know what to do as the letter said that I wasn't entitled to these and therefore they would only offer £1700 I'm glad to see that I can reclaim them and will reply saying that. Let's hope they pay the full amount.Do I now just send a reply saying that the recall charges are unlawful and request they pay the full amount or I'll start court proceedings?:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Glad.

I didn't even mention anything about them being unlawful in my letters, i just detailed them in my long list of charges.

At the end of the day, a £37.50 charge for a failed direct debit is unlawful - so i want it back!!

Same as you, my recall charges make up almost half of my claim.

I completely took no notice of them saying that they didn't look to refund these charges, so i just carried on with my MCOL.

Just for the record, FD have acknowledged my claim (monday) so i'll just be sitting tight until they decide to defend - which i can only assume they'll do. No doubt they're just waiting until the last minute again.

Best of luck Glad, stick to your guns and don't let the to$$ers get you down!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad, if i were you i would just proceed with your next letter (should be the LBA) for the full £3308.

 

 

On a different note.....

 

Just received from Northampton Court, the Notice of Acknowlegment and a copy of FD's response pack.

 

Usual stuff - DG Solicitors intend to defend all of my claim against FD.

 

So, lets see what drops through the door between now and the 2nd April.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - Ive just come on to ask about the same problem, My claim was for £3,500+ and Ive had the letter today saying they are not prepared to review recall fees (37.50) of which more than half make up my claim, they have offered £1650.00. Reading your replies Im guessing I should refuse to accept saying I want the recall fees back too and carry on with the claim?

Any advice very gratefully received - Zoe x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Zoe.

The best bet would be to accept their offer on the clear understanding that you will take them to court for the remainder.

Maybe FD are refusing to refund the recalled DD's because it's a nice little earner for them?

 

Best of luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - thanks so much for your advice - could you point me in the right direction for the correct format letter to send back please? (I know, I know - Im easily confused!!).

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hoorah - your good luck wishes worked. We have been offered £3150 for the sole account and the total amount on the other 2 accounts too (a couple of hundred).

 

Thanks xxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...