Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Loan Charges


nicho1120
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6105 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help me. I have written to a company with regards to charges I received on a secured loan I have no paid off. I was charged a total of £252 in charges for phone calls and letters that I received. They charged me £18 for both for each letter and phone call. I have sent letter for repayment and have received the following reply :-

 

Clause 7 of the terms and conditions of the agreement clearly states that we will recover from you costs incurred in the administartion of the agreement including communicating with you and collecting any unpaid sums due. Our tariff of charges also clearly identified the fees that may be charged during the term of the loan, details of which were provided to you with the original advance cheques.

 

The office of fair trading has to date only identified fees on credit cards as unfair. As your account was loan secured on the property it does not fall under this definition and therefore I regret that I am not prepared to consider a refund of fees.

 

What should I do next???

 

Does anyone believe that I have a case to get my charges back???

Link to post
Share on other sites

just ready to write my reply now. As above post is there anything that I should include in the letter except for the usual LBA ????

 

I do not think so..stick to the usual LBA...everything has to be as simple as possible for you:)))keep going:))

Carphone Warehouse WON £195.00

Welcome Finance in Court. N244 accepted.

Barclaycard WON with contractual, PPI and charges for time spent and letters sent

Halifax solo, switch, Credit Classic, Halifax one Itsme Vs Halifax 2 accounts

Creation Finance Prelim received offer of £79.88.... Itsme VS Creation Finance

Vodafone overcharged Vodafon.. anything that could be done?

 

U know where the scales r:)))))

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am doing the same with cabot and paragon, they both charged me up to £20 for a telephone call!!!!! How long were they talking to me, 5 hours?? I think not!! I was probably at work as well.

Anyway, I am sending my request for charges this weekend as they owe me £946

HALIFAX: PRE 6 year claim 1991-2006 WON 21/3/07 £2616

CAPITAL 1 - WON 19/3/07 £800.22

CAPITAL 1 - WON 19/3/07 £325.75

AQUA - MCOL 2/3/07 £172.79

ABBEY - MCOL 2/3/07 £261.37

HALIFAX VISA - WON default removal 19/3/07

PARAGON - LBA 11/3/07

CABOT -SAR 26/2/07

ROCKWELL -OFFER 20/2/07

GMAC -MCOL 7/2/07 £189.85

WESTCOT - SAR 25/2/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Anybody help me. I have taken my complaint to the FLA who have forwarded it on to the loan provider.They are basically saying that they have considered the OFT's findings on charges but say they do not accept the principle that its findings apply to this type of account an are un willing to pay up. Just writing a reply, what should I put in the letter ?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

nicho

 

I'm sorry I've not read your thread before. Can we go back to the original post. If the charges you are reclaiming are just for phone calls and letters, I don't think you can reclaim them. On a loan account, I think the only charge you can recalim is a charge for late payment - that is the only sort of charge that would constitute a penalty.

 

You might be able to claim that £18 is too much for a phone call or letter but that would have to be under something like s15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. I think you might have a hard time if it came to court. If your T&Cs actually say £18, then s15 wouldn't apply anyway.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...