Jump to content
style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4563 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Just Starting off a thread to track my refund progress with RBS. I am going for the nice approch, went to see customer services and asked for all by bank charages back. The poor girl just didn't get it, kept on asking about the last chrages on my account etc.

 

She got her team leader who, took about 5 min's to catch on. I had break out OFT, punlative charages etc.

 

Of course they then, very quickly said they would pass my conserns on etc, etc. letter in a few days.

 

So should get the standard, our chrages are legal and fair etc, blah, blah

 

But you never know .....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done, keep us posted :)


25/06/08 - NatWest - Prelim letter

09/03/06 - Halifax - Settled 27/4

22/03/06 - Capital One - Settled 24/6

17/04/06 - Nationwide - Settled 8/9

 

 

Hit the DONATE BUTTON and give 5% back to support this site!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well going in and having a chat with my branch seam's to have got something rolling. Got a letter back from one of the banks ' Customer Service Officer's' saying she had ordered up all my statments dating back to 1999.

 

So went on to say that this would then be passed on to an 'income manager' and that she would contact me with around 10 working days.

 

The letter is dated 15 May 2006, so progress we will have to wait and see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have done the same I had 2 accounts with them between 1999 and 2003.

Even back in 2001 my statement shows them charging 30.00 for a failed cheque and 20.00 referral charge.

 

Both accounts closed in 2003 so I have not been into the bank but instead have sent off requests for statements.


Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry haven't updated the thread in a while but here where I am up to.

 

Got the banks std reply saying blah blah, "fair and transparent", blah, blah "OFT is only talking about credit cards"

 

But they did go through all my statments and add up give me a list of charges. I don't think they really got what I was asking.

 

So I went back in to the bank and asked if I could have the copies of my statment they had (Which she had on her hand !!). Which the reply was yes, then all of a sudden quiet work was said to the person how was serving me. The "Yeh no problem" turn in to "Yes but..." got told that the statments had to be sent to there DPA dept. then they would be sent on to me. 3 week later and no statment, also another bank charge.

 

I just though to no more MR nice guy. I took the list of charges they give me from my account and wrote out the 14-day, please give me my £x money back else were going to court.

 

this is now 7-days later and no reply.

 

I'm to send a reminder and then follow up with a conformation by phone (all letters are reg. post anyway)

 

Soo... that's the story update....

 

We shall see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like its on to court now. Bank has said were not giving you back any charges and were in the right. Oh that they still think the OFT is only looking into credit cards.

 

The main jist of the letter said that they informed me before hand of all charges so they can do what they want. When asked to break down there charges and 'prove' that they related to the cost of maintance they said this is a 'trade' secret.

 

Well I think there in the wrong and I going to get a sheriff to tell them so...

 

 

Any advise on what angle to take with the bank when were in court would be great.

 

My current think is that there charged as unfair in term of cost vs actual cost and just keep it as simple as that. what you all think ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like its on to court now. Bank has said were not giving you back any charges and were in the right. Oh that they still think the OFT is only looking into credit cards.

 

The main jist of the letter said that they informed me before hand of all charges so they can do what they want. When asked to break down there charges and 'prove' that they related to the cost of maintance they said this is a 'trade' secret.

 

Well I think there in the wrong and I going to get a sheriff to tell them so...

 

 

Any advise on what angle to take with the bank when were in court would be great.

 

My current think is that there charged as unfair in term of cost vs actual cost and just keep it as simple as that. what you all think ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes thats pretty well about it.

 

These people are known for their arrogence but will cave when they are at the stage when they need to defend.

 

Here is a snippet which is usually suggested,you can change it slightly but is the framework of the litigation wording for you.

 

 

Claimant has account (A/C No) with Defendant from (Date)conducted on their standard terms and conditions. Claimant is claiming the return of (£0.00) taken by Defendant in charges over (X) years. The Defendant's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. They are also invalid under the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.Para.8 and sch.2.1.e.

In the event that the charges are not a penalty they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15. Defendant has declined justification of charges despite repeated requests. Claimant claims interest under Sec.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% a year from(Date) to (Date) of (£0.00) and also interest at same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of (£0.00)


Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dude. I'm going to sit down and fill out the forms at the start of next week, and get them handed in.

 

I really don't like the way RBS has delt with this matter because after speaking to branch staff, they are on my side its just there managers who hide behind them, that are 'not customer facing'

 

I will be looking for a new bank an 'ethical' one if such a thing exists ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with that

;)


Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well today was the day edinburgh sheriff court, all ready to do some bank whipping. Since they did they wanted to appeer. So I get approched just before the hearing starts, by a very 'green' young solicitor saying that he was instructed to get a they hearing delayed so they can settle out of court.

 

I gave him a little stick about 'well why couldn't you have sorted this out before now'. Then realised he was not the 'real' to dealing with the case.

 

They rather anoyed looking sheriff gave them two weeks to sort it out with me or were back in court.

 

Just now looking for some advice for dealing with this part.

 

Should I make sure that they know if I incur anymore charges I will follow the same action?

 

Anyother advice with this always wellcome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic was closed on 10 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4563 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you
Please fill in your quit date here
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?




  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That should do it, no mention of driver so should be OK, but just wait for DX and ericsbrother to check it.   These days you can get a decent pic with a smartphone and convert to pdf if no scanner available, there are also scanning apps available and online pdf converters.
    • Just something simple like this?      Dear ECP,    With reference to charge number: xxx xxx,  I would like to update you with the address of the registered keeper of the following vehicle:    Reg: xxx xxx Address: xxx xxx   Yours sincerely,    NameOfRegisteredKeeper
    • Thanks dx100uk   cal days?   Okay so as I understand your answer. I need phone court meditation and says yes to meditation if not too late now.   Then when phone meditation takes place I will have to tell them > I do not have all info. I answer that I don't have what is required to go ahead with meditation.   But that questionnaire requires me to answer yes or no? saying yes that i have it now is wrong? 2. I can confirm that I have enough information about the claim to allow me to enter into negotiations and that I do not require any further evidence from the other party before I can mediate   I will try to search and look for other things sorry I am just very confused with legal matters and don't want to risk doing anything wrong.    So I should not try to negotiate with Lowell? looking at 50 or 60% discount that was offered years ago?
    • No scanner to hand, so thought I'd get a bit of typing practice instead.     Header Info:      Body:     
    • yep simply send ECP a letter informing them of the current registered keepers address
  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • 30 Day Right To Reject - Vehicle Casualty Report. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415585-30-day-right-to-reject-vehicle-casualty-report/
      • 57 replies
×
×
  • Create New...