Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wayne Ting, chief executive of e-scooter firm Lime, says there's room for improvement. View the full article
    • If you are absolutely certain* that you were parked OK, write a letter of complaint to the Headteacher and copy in the Chair of the school governors.   If you or the car were identifiable in any way from the photo (eg visible registration number, driver's face etc) I would very politely write that you resent the untrue suggestion that you had parked/had stopped/were waiting in a way that contravened any traffic regulations, and that you are sure that the school will understand that you would like an apology and a correction to be printed in the next newsletter.  (You can also clearly state that you were identifiable from the photo because other parents have mentioned it to you).   See if that works.   You don't want to go to court for defamation as you'll need access to about £10k in fees before you get out of bed.  You just want an apology and a correction.  If what you've told us is accurate, I don't see any reasonable school failing to say sorry.     *My wife is a former school governor and my experience listening to her is that very very few parents actually understand the meaning of the no stopping/no waiting signs and road markings outside schools.  Don't complain unless you are sure you weren't stopped where you shouldn't have been.
    • And they haven't offered a speed awareness course either?  (Have you done one in the last three years or is this in Scotland?)   And is one of the notices for 34 in a 30?  As Man in the Middle says, that ought to be below the level at which they take action.   (And sorry - I don't want to appear preachy - but...  there don't have to be any warnings or signs or lines on the road to advise you of the presence of speed cameras.  If you get away with an exceptional hardship argument you will need to stick to speed limits in future - whether you know there are cameras there or not.  NB Don't know if this applies to you, but most 30 mph limits are restricted roads with a system of streetlighting and don't even need speed limit signs - you are assumed to know this from the Highway Code).
    • It's up to you if you want to pay £300 you don't owe plus whatever Unicorn Food Tax with no basis in law whatsoever that they will have made up in the Letter Before Claim.   We'd prefer you didn't.   But you have received a LBC so it's make your mind up time.   So please    - post up photos of the signage in the dark that you'll have taken two months ago (post 14)    - post up details of planning permission for their signs you'll have found out after you got onto the council, again two months ago (again post 14)    - also let us know if you agree with Brassnecked's excellent letter or if you'd like to tweak bits depending on what you've found out    - upload the LBC.  Some of them are appallingly drafted and invariably contain Unicorn Food Tax which is all useful extra ammo    - also, where are you living now (post 35) and are you comfortable with legal communications arriving at your parents'?   If you look in our PPC Successes thread at the top of the page, you will see 275 times these cheats have been seen off with their tails between their legs (and all had the same "well known legal companies" (ho! ho!) on hand).  In reality 275 times is a massive underestimate, in all 275 cases there was a "moment of victory" IYSWIM where the PPC were thrashed in court or discontinued a claim or were called off by a supermarket chain, etc., etc.  There will have been at least that number again where they were told to Foxtrot Oscar and then crawled back under their stone.  They are eminently beatable but logically when you're in legal dispute you have to put some graft in to beat the other party.
  • Our picks

they've taken my £1.00 CCA fee as payment on the debt i dont acknowledge!


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4219 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

last week out of the blue i recieved a letter from link saying i owed £344.00 (roughly) i instantly phoned them to see what this was about and apparantly it was for an old credit card debt with bank of scotland. Now i do remeber that and i paid about £700.00 to them and i'm pretty sure they said they'd write the rest of the amount off, anyway long time ago, cant be sure, so Link said the last payment i made was in aug 2000, and i've never heard anything about this for 5 years and now i get this letter. so the other day i sent them £1.00 and a letter asking for a copy credit agreement. (rec del of course) just come home to the phone ringing and some irate man form link shouting down the phone at me, firstly telling me the fee is £5 not £1 then declaring they dont think they have the CCA and i'd better just forget asking for it cos they aint got it and they gonna start putting charges on the £344. etc etc, he was quite abusive and i tried getting off the phone several times while he was ranting. I cant belive i owe this money, jesus its been like 5 years!! any ideas fellow FM's on what i do next. (i was thinking to just send the other £4 and request again the CCA) oh yes he said that it doesn;t matter about CCA as its on my credit file that i owe them?? so i dont need CCA. i love the way they get so aggressive and threaten to take me to court, i felt like blowing him a kiss down the phone and saying Happy Valentine Tiger!!!! grrr

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If the last payment you made was Aug 2000 and you haven't acknowledged the debt in writing up to aug 2006, and there was no CCJ - then it is statute barred and he can shouut as much as he likes - check your credit file to make sure thy haven't put another default on it.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites
If the last payment you made was Aug 2000 and you haven't acknowledged the debt in writing up to aug 2006, and there was no CCJ - then it is statute barred and he can shouut as much as he likes - check your credit file to make sure thy haven't put another default on it.

 

can they put another default on it? so if i get a copy of my credit file and they have put another default on it what should i do next? phew i'm still shaking, also when i originally phoned (never did 141 first but i told them i'd phone back and refused to give them my number telling them i didn;t want them to phone me! doh! they've phoned, obviously my number came up. tut)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I had a problem with Link in the middle of last year. They phoned regarding a loan from 1999 which they were saying had never been paid. Luckily, I am a hoarder and keep everything so miraculously managed to find a letter from the loan company in Nov 2000, confirming that the loan had been repaid in full. This wasn't enough for them though, they said I had to prove that I had paid it, which I found impossible after 6 years. Anyway, they made all kind of threats to me, told me that I had a default against me (which I havent), which would effect my current job and any future jobs I may go for, I would get a charge against my property and so on. I was really really shaken up by it - plus it was before I was aware of this site (which would have helped me hugely). Anyway, I basically wrote to them and asked them to prove that I hadn't paid it, rather than me proving that I had, considering I had the original letter saying it had been cleared. They continued to harass me by phone so I wrote asking them to remove my number from their records and not to contact me by phone which to be fair, they have adhered to - and I have never heard anything since!! I have waited for some time to pass as even though I knew it had been cleared, I also wanted to wait for the 6 years to be up from the date they claim the last payment was made, but my dad is going to go try to take it further due to the amount of upset it caused me. Anyway, my point is, I would ask them not to contact you by phone and as Gizmo said, hopefully it is statute barred anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

 

I had a problem with Link in the middle of last year. They phoned regarding a loan from 1999 which they were saying had never been paid. Luckily, I am a hoarder and keep everything so miraculously managed to find a letter from the loan company in Nov 2000, confirming that the loan had been repaid in full. This wasn't enough for them though, they said I had to prove that I had paid it, which I found impossible after 6 years. Anyway, they made all kind of threats to me, told me that I had a default against me (which I havent), which would effect my current job and any future jobs I may go for, I would get a charge against my property and so on. I was really really shaken up by it - plus it was before I was aware of this site (which would have helped me hugely). Anyway, I basically wrote to them and asked them to prove that I hadn't paid it, rather than me proving that I had, considering I had the original letter saying it had been cleared. They continued to harass me by phone so I wrote asking them to remove my number from their records and not to contact me by phone which to be fair, they have adhered to - and I have never heard anything since!! I have waited for some time to pass as even though I knew it had been cleared, I also wanted to wait for the 6 years to be up from the date they claim the last payment was made, but my dad is going to go try to take it further due to the amount of upset it caused me. Anyway, my point is, I would ask them not to contact you by phone and as Gizmo said, hopefully it is statute barred anyway.

 

great thanks for that, i did ask him if the call was being recorded and he said all calls were (i was surprised cos not often you get them shouting, aggressive now etc) unless he was lying, the 6 years will be up in aug but i'm worried that they will start adding stuff on etc. i mean i cant prove that i dont owe it, but they said they can prove i can simply by it being on my credit file? hopefully getting a copy of that today as i think its time to update it and get all the defaults removed from years ago!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, briefly;

 

sent £1.00 to link for CCA, they phoned (on 14th) to tell me they needed £5.00, so i've since sent the extra £4.00, now i have received letter from them (dated 14th) and this is what it says;

 

YOUR REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

 

Sections 77 and 78 of the consumer credit act 1974

 

These sections do not apply to your account. This is because Sections 77 and 78 only apply to "matters arising during the currency of...agreements". Since the agreement relating to your account has been terminated (for non-payment) the agreement is no longer "current".

 

YEP, thats it word for word, i haven't the foggiest what it means?

ps this is for £344 for an old C/C with BOS, i believe BOS were gonna write the outstanding amount off as i paid so much back on it, last payment was aug 2000, never heard a peep from anyone since (until 2 weeks ago).

 

any info from you would be very gratefully received!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
ok, briefly;

 

 

YEP, thats it word for word, i haven't the foggiest what it means?

ps this is for £344 for an old C/C with BOS, i believe BOS were gonna write the outstanding amount off as i paid so much back on it, last payment was aug 2000, never heard a peep from anyone since (until 2 weeks ago).

 

any info from you would be very gratefully received!!

 

Well if you made no payments or acknowledgeddebt in writing up to Aug 2006 it is statute barred and unenforceable anyhow.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Well if you made no payments or acknowledgeddebt in writing up to Aug 2006 it is statute barred and unenforceable anyhow.

 

 

OMG, why do i feel like a total moron! of course it is!!! doh, i was thinking it was only 6 years in aug 2007! i'm kicking myself now, ha ha, bet i know who will be kicking themselves!!! ho ho ho.

Link to post
Share on other sites

These sections do not apply to your account. This is because Sections 77 and 78 only apply to "matters arising during the currency of...agreements". Since the agreement relating to your account has been terminated (for non-payment) the agreement is no longer "current".

 

If the agreement is no longer "current" then you are no longer bound by it. And yes it's too old to enforce. Be careful they might be trying to trick you into re-setting the 6 year Statute Bar clock. I wouldn't enter into any further correspondence with them AT ALL.

"Why CCJ when you can CCA!"

Link to post
Share on other sites
If the agreement is no longer "current" then you are no longer bound by it. And yes it's too old to enforce. Be careful they might be trying to trick you into re-setting the 6 year Statute Bar clock. I wouldn't enter into any further correspondence with them AT ALL.

 

The 6 year clock can only be reset within the 6 year limit - once a debt is statute barred it remains statute barred.

For example had the OP acknowledged the debt in July 06 then they would have had till July 2012 to enfoce it, had she acknowledged in Sept 06 then it is already statute barred and cannot be restarted.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites
The 6 year clock can only be reset within the 6 year limit - once a debt is statute barred it remains statute barred.

For example had the OP acknowledged the debt in July 06 then they would have had till July 2012 to enfoce it, had she acknowledged in Sept 06 then it is already statute barred and cannot be restarted.

 

ta for that, they only contacted me only 2 weeks ago and i told them on the phone and in writing they i did NOT acknowledge the debt at all!

Link to post
Share on other sites
The 6 year clock can only be reset within the 6 year limit - once a debt is statute barred it remains statute barred.

For example had the OP acknowledged the debt in July 06 then they would have had till July 2012 to enfoce it, had she acknowledged in Sept 06 then it is already statute barred and cannot be restarted.

 

That's interesting Gizmo - I have seen other postings here saying it can be re-started after 6 years if you admit to it. Are you sure?

"Why CCJ when you can CCA!"

Link to post
Share on other sites
That's interesting Gizmo - I have seen other postings here saying it can be re-started after 6 years if you admit to it. Are you sure?

 

 

Absolutely sure - that is what The Limitation Act is all about -

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

soz, this is rushed, off to do the school run in a mo

 

posted a little earlier, anyway just had a very harrasing call from LINK (real) or rio i think he was called. i sent them a letter which they recieved by rec del and i clearly stated on it not to phone me ever again (i took it off the template here) as i didn;t acknowledge debt, been over 6 years! so its statute barred anyway, but i got confused over dates so i sent in my money for CCA,

the reason they phoned was they wanted me to send in to them LINK, some id before they'd give me a CCA, i calmly explained that its been over 6 years since this account has had a payment or correspondence and so its statute barred, i told him not to phone me again (as my 4 year old was shouting in the background), i dont owe this money and can they refund me my £5.00 that i sent for the CCA, he went totally mental, shouting etc, i reminded him that i put it in writing that i didn;t want any more calls etc and he said that they wouldn;t stop phoning unless i paid up!! he said he was gonna phone again tonight!!!! i hung up, soooo shaking like a leaf, where do i complain about this, total harrasment!

 

incedently he said the 6 years didn't count cos they only got the debt in 2001 (like what a load of old Sh*t)??? whats he on about?

can someone point me to a complaint letter please?

 

i'll be back after the school run

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can get a recording device from Maplins (online) I believe, for £9.99.

 

Even if you don't wish to buy one, it might be worth mentioning to him something like :

 

"I have to inform you that this 'phone call is being recorded, in light of the fact that you have ignored a recorded delivery letter to stop contacting me by 'phone, do you still wish to proceed ?"

 

You could report them to Trading Standards and the OFT, but harrassing 'phone calls are very hard to prove without requesting S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) info. (including 'phone transcripts) from them. Since it is a statute-barred debt.... I wouldn't do it.

 

The fact that they only got the debt in 2001 is their problem and not yours.. just don't acknowledge it in writing !

 

If they persist... buy the recording equipment and send the proof off to TS and the OFT.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

also why do you think they were asking me to send my ID to them? (thats what they asked first) they said to proceed with the CCA request i had to send them some ID? anyone heard of this at all? do they really think folk would do that? i might be a bit dizzy but i'm not as green as i'm cabbage looking!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
thanks, i've calmed down a little now (i've never in my life been shouted at like that by a company) i'm really surprised at them!

 

More of us are becoming aware of our rights and the procedures that should be followed before companies can collect from us. I don't think these people are used to coming up against much resistance... some may work on commission.... hence the rudeness.

 

Don't send them any i.d. They should have been certain of your identity before requesting payment from you in the first place. They didn't request i.d before being rude, did they ? Of course not. If the debt is not yet statute-barred, they could be pushing for a re-acknowledgement. Have nothing to do with them, unless you want to see how they react to your news of having recording equipment. If the debt is already statute-barred, it's not your problem any more.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry for multiple postings, the other threads i've done today are at the bottome of this page (if i've done it right) just reread the silly letter i received today about not giving me the CCA etc and noticed the amount i owe them is now £1.00 less (i was scared they might do something sneaky like this!) i used the template from the forum to request the CCA and it quite clearly stated the £1.00 fee is for the CCA payable under the consumer credit act. I'm sooooo mad. they had also asked for a further £4.00 which i sent and i made that clear too it was just the fee for the CCA not payment as i didn't acknowledge the debt. ggrrrrr.

 

anyone give me words of wisdom on this?

 

(harrassed mum of child who has lost her 1st tooth today!!!!)

Link to post
Share on other sites
sorry for multiple postings, the other threads i've done today are at the bottome of this page (if i've done it right) just reread the silly letter i received today about not giving me the CCA etc and noticed the amount i owe them is now £1.00 less (i was scared they might do something sneaky like this!) i used the template from the forum to request the CCA and it quite clearly stated the £1.00 fee is for the CCA payable under the consumer credit act. I'm sooooo mad. they had also asked for a further £4.00 which i sent and i made that clear too it was just the fee for the CCA not payment as i didn't acknowledge the debt. ggrrrrr.

 

anyone give me words of wisdom on this?

 

(harrassed mum of child who has lost her 1st tooth today!!!!)

 

They're taking the p**s! WAIT and let them commit an offence, don't get mad, keep meticulous records. Never speak to these people on the 'phone, keep a papertrail, always by recorded delivery. Always send the maximum statutory fee and never send more, reply to requests for more with "i've already sent you the statutory maximum fee"! Keep it bussiness like.

 

The longer they take the p**s the better it is for you! These tactics are simply to get you mad like you say you are! These people are trained to get you mad.

 

Simply stalling tactics. When their time is up tell them, and not before!

 

Best of luck, Dave.

If my post was helpful don't forget to click the star!

Advice is offered freely, without liability and without prejudice.

If in any doubt professional legal advice should be sought.

 

I do not profess to be in any way legally trained, I am a big

oily truck driver and all I know has been learned within the

Consumer Action Group.

 

FAQ's

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

 

Trying to stop smoking?

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/give-up-smoking-here/

 

A dummies guide to the forums

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

--

KEEP WILDLIFE IN THE WILD

http://www.bornfree.org.uk

BORN FREE FOUNDATION

--

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure I read on another thread that someone else had refused to provide ID but reminded a DCA of their obligations to supply a copy agreement under CCA. The main concern was that the DCA would try to reproduce an agreement with a signature copied on to it. I would look around on the forum to see if anyone else has had similar problems. Once you have the bairns in bed and the tooth fairy duty is done, get yourself a big drink and start trawling through the posts. I would suggest the debt group is the best place to start.

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...