Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Vodafone Dispute


mila
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5376 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a business contract with vodafone for many years, that has been defaulted by Vodafone for non payment, a payment that I am disputing.

 

Vodafone have employed Wescot to recover this "debt".

 

I have wrote to both Vodafone (about default issue) and Westcot (sent a CCA request).

 

Wescot replied as follows:

 

"We can confirm under the terms of the Consumer Credit Act (excempt agreements) Order 1989, Article 3 (1) this account is not regulated by the Credit Credit Act ans is enforceable"

My question is, Are Wescot right?

 

need some help folk, please

 

mila

Link to post
Share on other sites

Politely write to Wescot stating that you're in dispute with (in this case) Vodafone, and that until that matter is sorted, you will not be paying Wescot Anything!!!

 

Wescot are not a financial institution so they cannot charge you interest.

 

You're keeping them in the loop, but you have to instigtate the process against Vodafone as soon as possible.

 

I had a similar situation with O2 - obviously yours may be abit different - so I apologise if thsi does not suit your situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As noted in mail, there is no CCA issue.

Buzby

 

Thanks for the pm, I tried replying but your box is full.

 

Now that CCA is not an issue, can I still ask for the deed of assignment and if they fail on this, does it mean they (Wescot) cannot enforce it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've made a big error - this is a default, not a 'Default'. As the former, this is simply Vodafone's opinion on how you conducted your account. You do not have to deal with a CRA if the account is in dispute. Ask Vodafone to clarify any issues you are unsure of. Did you terminate your contract? If so, why are the billing you?

 

Nothing can be enforcerd, Wescot are there to collect the cash their client says they are owed. ONce you tell them the amounts are disputed, they cannot proceed further until Vodafone have resolved the issue or proved the debt actually exists.

 

What is the background to the problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a big bill from vodafone - £440, agreed with vodafone to a payment plan, was paying it off, then was hospitilsed.

 

When I recovered, continued paying, but they said account was in default. I told them of my illness, but said the dafult would stand.

 

So when wescot contacted me, thats when i sent cca to them and SAR to vodaphone

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - am I right in assuming the payment plan was a result of them ceasing the contract and ending up with a final sum that you agreed to repay? (Rather than an ongoing arrangement with a still active account).

 

In these cases, when a payment arrangement is made - this is their gesture of goodwill, and payments to account are seen as sacrosanct. Keep up the payments and the issue is resolved, break them and they see this as a failure of the debtor to meet their arrangement and the deal is off.

 

It is not that they are unsympathetic to issues of hospitalisation and the like, they're simply not relevant to them or their cashflow. You're allowed to pay your council tax in 10 equal installments. Miss one, and the whole rmeaining balance becomes due. Yes, I'm aware if you couldn't find that month's payment, there's no likleyhood if you paying the 6 months outstanding - but they automatically call in the whole balance and Summary Warrant issued.

 

Whilst Vodafone don't have the same powers as the council, they are put upon by others who see the payment plan as a soft option, and try to milk the system. If Vodafone are owed the money, they I'd continuie to pay what was agreeed, making an additional payments or two to bring it back into line, and refusing to deal with the DCA. By doing so any enforcerment action would be seen as bullying, and place them at a disadvantage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - I agree, however unfair this is - that is one of their sanctions. The positive side is that I reckon 80% of the people who have mobile phone contracts have adverse daya on their file. In isolation, it's not a big deal, and will drop off after 72 months of being entered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never say never. If you explain the circumstances and get back on track, there's every chance. There still will be late payment flags leading to the default which will remain, but keeping in contract and building a reasonable rapport can work wonders.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...