Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

help please.


raindrops
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6279 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks, Sorry, this is gonna be a long one. My friend sent off a letter to Abbey requesting a list of charges and giving them 40 days notice to do so. She used the template from the mse website as we hadn't discovered CAG then.She also enclosed a cheque for £10.00.

Today she received a letter back from Abbey thanking her for her letter dated 29th jan which they received on the 6th feb. (my, the posts getting slower).The letter says "unfortunately we are unable to supply a list of charges applied to your account for the last six years because we do not store this information seperately from other transactional data. We can supply a list of the transactions on your account which will include any charges applied, although arrangementshave been made to send you the last 14 months transactions in the form of duplicate statements. Most transactional informationbetween 2001-2005 has been archived onto microfiche and is not available on our computer system. please note that there is a fee of £10.00 for the provision of this information and we are unable to deal with your request untill the fee has been received. Please fill in the form enclosed and return it to us"

The letter then goes on to tell her ways she can pay the £10.00. The form enclosed with this letter says, "I request a statement of transactions from the period from ----to---- and i understand that a fee of £10.00 is payable. please be assured thatupon reciept of a authorisation request form your request will be actioned.Iwill keep your file open for the next 8 weeks and if i do not hear from you within that time i will assume that you no longer wish to proceed with your request and close your file. Please can i take this opportunity to assure you that any delay this may cause is unintentional. If you have any questions please call us on, tel no."

Now am i wrong but are the Abbey not asking her to ask again what she has already asked for and to pay what she's already paid for?

We're not sure if the cheque has been cashed either yet. (sorry this is so long) Does anyone know if this is normal procedure. We really don't have a clue what to do know. i havn't actually seen the letter, my friend just rang and dictated it to me as she doesn't have a computer, but this is all pretty scary. Can anyone help us please. Many thanks in advance, starry:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

usual blurb, stalling tactics.

read a few threads here.

stick with your timetables, almost about time for LBA is it not?;)

 

dx100uk:cool:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We're not sure if the cheque has been cashed either yet.

It would help if you can find out. If they have, write back pointing this out and underline that the 40 days started from your original letter.

 

If they haven't then return the form + £10. Point out that this is the 2nd payment and that if the first cheque is cashed you will want this refunded.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I found that they could not supply info because it was stored on Microfish, but it was all supplied and I now have 2 claims in with them.

 

As others will tell you, we set out out time table and they have to follow it.

 

Ignore all letters where they say we will get back to you in TEN years!

 

And stick to your timetable. You set out the deadlines in your letters and follow them!!

 

All the best and get your money back!!

Woolwich N1 issued 15.01.07 £11k

Acknowledged 01.02.07

Defence Filed 15.02.07

AQ Filed 21.02.07

AQ Deadline 05.03.07

Woolwich AQ late, given till 16.03.07

29.03.07, Judgement rec, woolwich to pay up by 10.04.07

Money received 16.04.07

 

Nationwide MCOL issued 22.01.07 £1k

Settled in full 05.02.07:D

Account being closed

Appeared on Watchdog 20.02.07

 

Abbey Issue MCOL £5k 24.01.07

Defence Filed 21.02.07

29.03.07, AQ hearing set for 20.04.07 with other like cases.

11.04.07, Full settlement letter received for £5,769.12

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would help if you can find out. If they have, write back pointing this out and underline that the 40 days started from your original letter.

 

If they haven't then return the form + £10. Point out that this is the 2nd payment and that if the first cheque is cashed you will want this refunded.[/quote

Thanks Micheal, I'll get her to ring tomorrow and see if they have cashed her cheque and take it from there. Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found that they could not supply info because it was stored on Microfish, but it was all supplied and I now have 2 claims in with them.

 

As others will tell you, we set out out time table and they have to follow it.

 

Ignore all letters where they say we will get back to you in TEN years!

 

And stick to your timetable. You set out the deadlines in your letters and follow them!!

 

All the best and get your money back!!

Hi, am getting confused now, (doesn't take much) with diff answers. shall i tell her just to wait and do nothing? Thanks for helping, it's so scarey!!!:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Michael Brown has said if you have paid the £10 then get onto them in writing, fill in their stupid form, and tell them you have already supplied the £10 for the SAR and no further money is required for the data you have requested. quote the cheque number and if possible check to see if the cheque has been cashed. It should only cost you £10 to receive your entire records regarding any account.HTH.

 

Regards bish.

  • Haha 1

Abbey : £8070.41*PAID IN FULL*14/02/07:D

Capital one : LBA sent 17/09/06 £1,087.22

Marbles : LBA sent 17/09/06 £720.00 ; £720 offer accepted:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...