Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EricTheRed v Abbey


EricTheRed
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1876 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry to be a bit thick about this but do I?

 

1. As I don’t know the exact amount send the DPA letter to the Abbey and when I get the records and then………………

2. When I get a reply from them detailing the charges send the letter and spreadsheet detailing my claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

yes

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve just had to go into my branch and practically beg that they extend my overdraft because THEY have charged me over £600 in charges since January. I told them that the reason I was over £1400 short plus the charges was because I had a dispute with the council and they got an AOE for my council tax which was taken all in one go in January. The Abbey told me that they will appeal to their underwriter to extend my overdraft to cover the charges that they have levied. I went into the bank to cancel my direct debits but when the girl realised I was cancelling their (Abbey) insurances then she came up with this idea of appealing to the underwriter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol::lol:
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to think about opening another bank account and having your salary paid in there so that you can get some control back. Abbey speaking to its underwriter is the same thing as Abbey speaking to its reflection in the mirror.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a couple of poits though. Won't they submit all this as evidence if I take them to court and use it in their defence? Could n't they claim I was negligent and they have bent over backwards to help me because I mis managed my money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No The charges are unlawful no matter how poor a money manager you are

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the final straw. After speaking to Abbey they have told me that has just come back to me and said that they are unwilling to increase my overdraft on a temporary basis. I explained that the reason it was £94.64 was because they have charged me over £600 in charges since 1st January. I’m going to close the account and go elsewhere in the eternal hope that things get better. I’m only afraid now that if all this is logged onto their system that they will call in the overdraft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Open another elsewhere now. If you want your charges back you should start action in accordance with the Step by Step Guide.

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've started my claim against them, MBNA and Capital One and have done it in accordance with the advice from the forum. I'm sure I'll be succesful but there is always a danger that in my current situation that Abbey will take their bat and ball home and call in the overdraft. If they call in the overdraft when I have a pending action against them would they bring my delinquency into question as part of their defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. It's nothing to do with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As soon as you wages stop going into the account they will give you one month to pay back your overdraft, so think carefully about your options.

 

How much is your overdraft?

Natasha

 

Abbey-received DPA letter on 13/03, received some breakdown till 2004 waiting for the more recent ones(where most charges occurred)

sent reminder email on 17/4/06

called abbey on 19/04/06 to remind them:rolleyes:

sent another email on 26/04/06:mad:

Approx charges £2500

received £500 refund in dec 06

sent LBA

Capital one- sent DPA letter 17/03

Sent prim letter for charges of £260 14/04

Received a refund £109 awaiting further refund of £151

Settled IN FULL

Barclay card- Sent DPA letter 17/03 sent reminder 14/04

received info claiming £120

settled in FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. So they would n't even bring it up in respect of my action?

They probably will refer to it in their defence but it is not relevant to the issues which you are raising.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not being admissible means that the judge won't hear it or won't consider it when making his decision. It doen't mean that it is not included in the papers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry for being a bit thick here but if it is included in their papers then it is being submitted and therefore would n't it have to pass the admissibility test? Won't the judge look at all the papers?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but his head is full of Chinese walls

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1876 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...