Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

AJS vs RBOS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6471 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What a brilliant site!!!

 

I have just posted my prem letter and will be eagerly waiting a response.

 

The amount of charges I have claimed for is £1003.90 from 3 accounts over past 3 years.

 

Will keep this updated - many thanks to everyone who has put information here for people like me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't believe that after getting my prem letter they have made another charge of £30 to my account which they won't give back, so I am having to rewrite my letter adding this amount to it.

 

I have also made an appointment next week to close down all my accounts withy RBS (one joint, one personal and one business) because they won't refund this charge while the case is pending.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

Yep, just keep adding them up, and when you come to file in court, just add it on then!

 

Good Luck

 

Lou x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have received a letter from the bank offering me £105 as a goodwill gesture (original claim £1003 + £30 added since), but if I accept it the letter says that it will be considered settlement of all claims I have relating to these charges.

 

I have read somewhere on this site that you can accept this first offer and still go ahead with the claim - how does this work?

 

I have also spoken to the bank about this letter when I phoned up about a seperate matter, and was told that if I wanted to take the matter any further then I need to speak to the banking ombudsman.

 

I know about the letter before action, but do I still send it even though they have made me an offer? I have told them I will be persuing my case in spite of the "goodwill gesture" they have made - should I still continue dealing with my own branch in this matter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, can I add the £15 I paid for the searches on my bank accounts as a cost I can claim back from them?

 

Thanks for any help on this - this site is extremely helpful - I can't believe you aren't charging for membership!! I will definately be making a donation when I get my cash!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a letter from the bank offering me £105 as a goodwill gesture (original claim £1003 + £30 added since), but if I accept it the letter says that it will be considered settlement of all claims I have relating to these charges.

 

I have read somewhere on this site that you can accept this first offer and still go ahead with the claim - how does this work?

 

I have also spoken to the bank about this letter when I phoned up about a seperate matter, and was told that if I wanted to take the matter any further then I need to speak to the banking ombudsman.

 

I know about the letter before action, but do I still send it even though they have made me an offer? I have told them I will be persuing my case in spite of the "goodwill gesture" they have made - should I still continue dealing with my own branch in this matter?

 

CRAP is the short answer to all points they raised-

1.Tell them thanks for the interim payment but you are pursuing them for the full amount-and sign nothing!!

 

2.Just follow the schedules as laid out in the FAQ's and you will be fine.

 

3.The banking ombudsman has nothing to do wih this issue and this is a well-known delaying tactic used by the banks.COurt is the place to go when they don't play ball.

 

 

if you have found this post to be of use,please click on the scales at the top right;)

  • Confused 2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Replied with this letter:

 

Firstly, with regards to your recent letter following my correspondence, I would like to accept your goodwill gesture to repay £105 of the money taken from my account over the past 4 years. This acceptance is in no way a settlement but will be regarded as an interim payment.

Secondly, I understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

I calculate that you have taken £1033.

 

I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest, plus my costs and without further notice.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Although, I have since received a phone call from the manager at my branch telling me that the case is now being dealt with by the customer relations office (or similar dept).

 

I would like to keep correspondance local and through my branch - am I able to do this, or should I do as she says and deal with it at this other department?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've posted all correspondance to my local branch manager, let them deal with getting it to the right department!

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Reet then.

 

I've now received a letter from Customer Relations telling me that they are not going to give me the £105 they offered me as a goodwill gesture because it was on the condition that it was a full and final settlement. It reads:

 

I know you have refused this offer but I can do little more than ask you to review your decision. This offer is not to be increased.

 

Therefore this is the banks final response to you on this matter. You may now wish to seek the opinion of the Financial Ombudsman Service blah blah blah......

 

This letter was sent to me following a Letter Before Action but the reply does not once refer to this case possibly going to court.

 

 

On another note, I have given them 14 days to reply before taking the matter further. 14 days expires on Monday but I have already received my reply, so can I make my claim via moneyclaim today? I would stick to my timetable, but am off on holiday next week and won't have a chance to get to a computer.

 

Thanks in advance for any more help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ohh thats exactly the same as I got yesterday about my £500 offer, I promptly filed a claim against them on moneyclaim. can't see why you shouldn't file it today they say in the letter they're not going to reconsider so go for it.

 

Stacy

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Guess what - the claim on Moneyclaim was defended at the 11th hour, so have received a letter from Cobbetts this morning.

 

The letter contains a load of points that I have no clue about and requests for information include:

 

Bank account details for the accounts for which I am claiming

Information on each and every charge made, what it was for, when it was taken etc

Also asks me, (and it goes on from there)

 

2.3 In relation to each charge, please clarify the following: (a) is it the case of the claimant the same should not have been charged? (b) If yes; please explain why the claimant contends that the same should not have been charged? © If no; is it the case of the defendant that the same should not have been charged in this amount? (d) If yes; please explain why the claimant contends that the same should not have been charged in this amount and identify the sum the claimant contends should have been charged. (e) If no; please state the claimants case.

 

3. In your claim you state that "the banks charges are a disproportianate penalty and therefore unenforcable as they are contrary to common law".

 

4. Please provide the following particulars in support of your claim:

 

4.1 Please specify the clause(s) persuant to which the charges were applied;

4.2 Please specify whether the charges applied were due to breach of contract by the claimant;

4.3 Please identify in each case the particular breach of contract (by reference to appropriate term(s) of the contract) that the charge related to.

 

5. In your claim you state that the charges are: "invalid under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977 s.4 and unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 Para.8 and Sch.2(1)(e)" and "unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15".

 

6. Please specify all of the facts relied on by the Claimant in support of the contentions in paragraph 5 above, and in particular please identify the contractual provisions(s) that the claimant alleges are invalid by reference to UCTA/the Regulations.

 

 

I am a little confused as to waht to do about this - I have looked around the site and there seem to be differing opinions, so any advice given on this particular case will be gratefully accepted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same defence right on the last minute as well, send them a reply with a copy of your spreadsheet of charges, give them the account number and sort code and if they've made the request for further info under CPR part 18 point out to them that you won't be responding as you expect the claim to be allocated to the small claims track and CPR part 18 info can only be requested by the courts.

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 10 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6471 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...