Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  
    • Thanks for your interest dx100. Didn’t reach a hearing. Although they filed court papers, they withdrew a few days beforehand, and admitted it was statute barred and I have it in writing that they say the matter is now closed. Once again, many thanks for all your help.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFO CCA success but Barclaycard default: Surlybonds letter & Lizzy success?


manchestman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6279 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Having read Surlybonds brilliant default removal letter/template, I am wondering if this is the way forward for me, as I am not sure if the default was placed before or after the 'contract' ended. I am now a little stuck as to which way to now proceed in getting this default removed and would appreciate any advice.

I apologise for the long 'history lesson' here! I first posted about my sons alleged debt to Barclaycard which now stands at £582. I calculate this is made up of £440 (11 x £40) illegal charges between Nov 2003 and Sept 2005, a transfer fee (it has now been sold) and of course much interest. It is my contention that this 'debt' is made entirely of illegal charges, accrued interest and the transfer fee (or whatever name it is given, when a new deed of assignment is applied).

Initially we had to deal with several DCA and their harrassment till I came upon this site.

Initially, I think I made an elemental error in writing to the DCAs with a CCA and a £1 postal order, as they were only agents for Barclaycard and their non response did not further my cause at all.

Anyway, after a DPA disclosure request to Barclaycard along with the statutory £10 fee on 11 Sept, it resulted with a letter containing a computer printout of most items, but not all and certainly not listing individual transactions/charges etc.

17/Sept 2006: Issued a LBA stating they had failed to provide all docs etc, a claim for the amount they had taken in unlawful charges and an insistence that they remove the default notice.

I received no reply whatsover to the LBA and in mid October, I got letter from HFO Services with a notice of assignment to this new DCA, (11 Oct 2006). I thought this was attrocious behaviour of Barclaycard to simply sell on an account while in negotiation & dispute.

To be fair, HFO have not harrassed and once served with a section 77 CCA on 14th Dec, their solicitor replied quickly stating it was being referred back to Barclaycard and that Barclaycard 'may or maynot' take the account back and that HFO did not want to be a 'third party in any dispute' with Barclaycard! Although I wrote again to HFO solicitors, reitterating my CCA request there has been silence.

Result? Yes, I think so, at least partially. As HFO cannot enforce the 'debt' as they have not provided the original agreement or anything else for that matter within the statutory 42 days, I think that sitting tight and my son having no 'debt' to pay is a result of sorts.

However, there is still a default notice placed on his credit file by Barclaycard (well before the sale to HFO), and this is where I would like advice please, in knowing which route to persue to obtain its removal.

Firstly, we did not know it was there (though we are not surprised there is a default notice) until it was discovered by accident. At no time have we had notification that a default notice would be placed on the account, nor was any info about it given under the DCA request.

Removing the default notice is now my main objective. I feel there may be two routes to travel and would like to know which one seems the best? I could use the approach and template given by SurlyBonds but I am unsure about whether the default would have been placed before my contract ended or not? If I could use this, it would surely seem the easiest way to begin.

Or, I could resurrect my battle over charges with Barclaycard, take them to court and ask for the removal of the default at the same time? I just feel a little uneasy about resurrecting a battle with Barclaycard themselves, that we seem to have already won, albeit by default because of non compliance to the CCA request by HFO Services..

< < < < If I can help I will and if I have helped please tip my scales. :|

Please keep this site alive by downloading the great new CAG toolbar - keeps all your subscribed threads in one easy to use place. http://consumeractiongroup.co.uk/cag_plugin.php Use the search facility regularly and CAG generates much needed money!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello and welcome to the legalities forum and in particular the exciting world of default removals!

 

you are tight in that there are two avenues for you to explore but you may have slightly mis-understood the 'contract has ended or not' deal.

 

it doesn't matter if the contract was in place or not at the time of the default only whether it is in place now.

 

If the debt is satisfied and the contract has ended then you can issue a notice under S.10(1) to require the data controller to cease processing data that is causing you unwarranted damages or distress.

 

is the debt satisifed? if not - then revisiting the charges claim is the best way forward I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dayglo and all

Thanks for your answer and advice ... and for reading an exceedingly long explanation! :-))

You are absolutely right in that I did not understand the contract status but now that is clarified, I do understand that I no longer have a contract.

However, because the 'debt' is not satisfied and is in complete contention, this means that surlybonds letter is not the route for me? So you think that my best route is to reopen the charges dispute with barclaycard, maybe I should begin with a CCA? (Since they could not supply HFO with one, maybe they cant even be bothered here too?). Though thinking about this, even if they dont respond to a CCA, it will still leave me in the same boat and having to force court action. hmmm, sorry for thinking aloud!

As I have already issued a (unanswered, but sent recorded delivery) LBA back in September prior to Barclaycards sale of the debt, maybe I should simply fill out a N1 for the disputed charges and file for court action, or should I write to them once more first as my LBA was so long ago now? Please let me know if this sounds right. Also, if I fill out a N1, should I state on it that as the default only occurred because, and is solely made up of their illegal charges, this should be removed too?

Thanks

< < < < If I can help I will and if I have helped please tip my scales. :|

Please keep this site alive by downloading the great new CAG toolbar - keeps all your subscribed threads in one easy to use place. http://consumeractiongroup.co.uk/cag_plugin.php Use the search facility regularly and CAG generates much needed money!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...