Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and thank you for concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What's the difference between an HSBC managed loan and a normal loan?


gemspan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5961 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Reading in THe Scotsman today that HBOS are on set for record full year profits. They are in line to make pretax profits of 5.35 billion.

 

The release of this information is badly timed. I wonder just how much of this money is made from unfair bank charges. I also wonder what their profits will be next year when they have to pay them all back!!!! :D

 

Gemspan

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI

 

Once I have dealt with the rest of the creditors I will be turning my attention onto HSBC. I have this week received 2 letters advising me that they have declined my unauthorised overdraft application and have returned 2 direct debits at the cost of £25 each - and they have cancelled the DDs.

 

This is new wording and does anybody think that this is HSBC trying to get around the unlawful charges by deeming this to be an unauthorised overdraft fee?

 

I just wondered what the more experienced thought.

 

THanks a lot

Gemspan

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems fairly standard to me.

 

An 'unauthorised' overdraft fee IS a penalty charge and should be dealt with as such.

Smile:-The Ethical Bank:- Settled July 2006

HSBC:- Pre-lim sent 09/10/2006

LBA sent:-26/10/2006

Court papers issued:- 13/11/2006

Citifinancial/DLC:- Ongoing since 21st August. Now part of an OFT investigation into Debt Collection Practices.

I am only a Doctor of Love NOT Law. Don't blame me if me advice goes belly up!

:D (I will try to help all the same)

 

If i've helped, use the scales at the top to tell me how great I am!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the advice. Because this is new wording I wondered if it was their way of trying to get out of the unlawful charges.

 

I watched The Money Programme during the week and thought it was laughable that the banks are now trying to say this is a service they are providing and therefore they are not unlawful charges!!!!! Thought HSBC were trying to get in on the act and change their goalposts.

 

Thanks a lot

Annie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Annie,

 

How on earth can it be a 'service' ?? for WHAT - the few micro seconds it takes computer to automatically monitor your account and 'notice' that you have exceeded a certain limit and then debit £30 from your account !!!!!!

 

The is NO manual interventon, nor do they even incurr the cost of a stamp as they don't write a nice 'you've just been fleeced' letter

 

They can wish all they want about it being 'lawful' but that's the very reason why not one single high street bank has actually appeared in court - they are petrified that they would loose, atract unwanted publicity and then 1,000 of people jump on the 'pay us bank' band waggon !!!

 

Remember in 2005 the banks reaped a massive £3 BILLION in charges . . would you 'risk' loosing that nice little earner, NO you would just pay back to those that found out how and issued a claim agaisnt them, and traet it as 'irritating' !!!!

 

Steve

  • Haha 1

Dec 2006 - Sucessfully recovered over £3k from HSBC with much help from CAG :-D

 

 

if you found this post helpful, please click my reputation, thank you

 

(The small print-my advice and opinions are my own, and are given freely and without predjudice or liability whatsoever)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can call it what they like, 'fee', 'service' whatever - its still a penalty. Its punitive by its very nature, no matter what they might care to call it. Its called 'cloaking' and its not likely to impress the courts much. Heres what the OFT had to say about it in their April report -

 

4.21 Disguised Penalties

 

The analysis in this statement is in terms of explicit, transparent default fees. Attempts to restructure accounts in order to present events of default spuriously as additional services for which a charge may be made should be viewed as disguised penalties and equally open to challenge where grounds of unfairness exist. (For example, a charge for ‘agreeing’ or ‘allowing’ a customer to exceed a credit limit is no different from a customers default in exceeding a credit limit.) The UTCCR’s are concerned with the intentions and effects of terms, not just their mechanism.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Claire

 

If they do then that would be good (not for you of course!!!!) because they would lose and it would mean they would stop playing silly beggars with people.

 

The people that these unlawful charges have hit the most is the likes of you and me. By that I mean we dont have a lot of money and if, like me, you live on a tight budget then something like those horrendous charges can make your life a misery.

 

I really hope you can find the £100 to go for this as it would be a shame for you not to. I think the banks realise the costs involved and hope that people will pull out.

 

I hope 2007 is a good year for you. Dont worry; you will get the money you are entitled to.

 

Kind regards

Annie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Annie, theres is just no telling I have just been reading boxers thread and he got his offer 2 days before he was due to send his AQ off, I will go for it though it is just hard to believe that you are ever going to get it back, mine is just on 5k, alot of money for the likes of me and with a new baby on the way I really need it!! All the best for 2007 I will keep you informed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Annie, theres is just no telling I have just been reading boxers thread and he got his offer 2 days before he was due to send his AQ off, I will go for it though it is just hard to believe that you are ever going to get it back, mine is just on 5k, alot of money for the likes of me and with a new baby on the way I really need it!! All the best for 2007 I will keep you informed.

 

Hi Claire

 

I'm following all cases very carefully and i'm so glad i'm not the only nervous wreck on the internet lol......

 

I'm just so envious that you are at the AQ stage and like you, i will struggle to find the funds when i get there BUT get there we all will.

 

Congratulations on the baby by the way... even more reason to hang in there eh?!!

 

Netty x

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

HI there

 

Can anyone tell me the difference between a managed loan and a normal loan? When I hit financial probs HSBC put me on a managed loan with payments of £321 per month which are crippling me.

 

Any answers would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

Gemspan

Link to post
Share on other sites

A managed loan I think is one specifically on charges and likelihood is that it is about 3% higher than a normal loan. I hope someone with a bit more knowledge of HSBC can either confirm or correct me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good evening Gemspan

From my own experiences the managed loan is one that is generally imposed by the bank as a means to 'help' people sort out problems such as overdrawn accounts etc. It normally has a higher interest rate than an ordinary bank loan and has other strings attached such as no overdraft facility or access to other forms of credit. You may find, as I did, that even after the loan has been paid in full, with a perfect payment record that further credit is refused.

 

Over the past ten years or so I have had three managed loans imposed upon me and am at present resisting overtures from hsbc to take another one...I might add that all these loans were a direct result of bank charges and if I knew then what I know now, as a result of this site, I woul

d'nt have signed the paperwork.

Not only do they screw you with the charges...they then sell you the money to pay

them back...unbelievable is'nt it......But now the worm is turning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i always saw managed loans as 'last resort loans' where the bank make you feel like you're not going to get help anywhere else so pay up even though the interest rate is higher than anything else!!

 

they're usually the ones that get everybody into serious trouble if you don't pay an installment - they seem to spiral out of control very quickly!!

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount that I'm paying is so much more than my original loan £321 as opposed to £250 (and that included ppi!). Is it worthwhile complaining to HSBC about this because I dont think they have taken my best interests into account. If they really want to help, why do they charge you over the top interest? It just doesnt make sense.

 

Annie

Link to post
Share on other sites

but now we know that the banks don't operate in 'your best interests' but seem to zoom in on your vulnerability...... just go for the claim - get it back

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi All,

 

I posted this on another HSBC thread about managed loans. Anyone had any better luck than me??

 

was forced to take out my loan to refinance a personal loan from HSBC that was from my husbands Uni overdraft and student loans etc plus a credit card of my own about 3 years ago- I was paying 7.3% on that loan and am now paying (supposedly) 12%. These loans are a nightmare as they will not allow you under any circumstance to pay a lower amount- for example I was off work for 4 weeks with laryngitis and wasn't paid for it- called HSBC to see if I could pay a lower amount for that month as I was the best part of £1200 down on my wages. They refused point blank- took their £216.00 and then returned other direct debits due to insufficient funds!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The bank wins every time. I'm glad that people are fighting back. I can't even work out the percentage of interest that I am paying as I don't hve a clue how they calculate it. All I know is that in 18 months or so I have supposedly only paid off £500 when in reality I have paid approximately £3888???????????????????? ???????? They are no better than loan sharks that come to your door. I wouldn't mind but I'm not exactly high risk- we own our own home, both work full time and bring in good money- yet we are treated like untrustworthy idiots. I am absolutely going to fight them over this as I am sick of going out to work to pay people like them!! RRRAAAHHHHHHH!

 

 

Well, couldn't go to the branch this morning as the kids are still off school ( didn't think it would be wise for my 3 and 5 year olds to see mummy going purple in the face and screaming at the nice bank man!) so I called the credit department. I have had a splitting headache ever since. The extremely (!) nice man on the end of the phone told me that I had signed for the loan therefore I signed the terms and conditions. I told him that I had signed up for 12.25% interest and expected to pay 12.25% not the almost 60% that I am currently paying per month. He assured (:confused: ) me that I am not paying 60% and that the more of the loan that I pay off the lower the interest payment will be. However, if I pay the loan off early there will be no rebate of the interest that I have paid:evil: . So HSBC are expecting me to continue paying £216 for the next 8.5 yearson this loan. This means that I will actually be paying them £25920.00 for a £15k loan. Hmmm, let me just ponder on that one for a minute..........

Nope I don't think so........

I asked how HSBC thought they were any better that loan sharks to which I got the same answer " you signed the paperwork"

I may have signed the paperwork, but it was under duress as HSBC told me it was that or bankruptcy. They even gave me the business card of an insolvancy practitioner!!! When I took this loan out to get rid of the joint one I was made to put it in my name only. I was also unemployed.I lost my business in the October ( hsbc knew this as I had a business account with them) took this loan in the Jan and didn't start work until the March. They never allow you to lower the payment if you get into difficulty and then charge you if there is not then enough money to cover your other bills in your account. I have now transfered the money from my remortgage from my HSBC account and I will not be clearing this managed loan as yet, as I have put a complaint in with the ombudsman about the way HSBC put these loans across. They have told me that its a bit like a mortgage- uh, no- it's a personal loan that is linked to your bank account that allows the bank carte blanche over you and also allows them to treat you like a 14 year old only allowing you to have a solo (rraahhhh) card and then to speak to you as if you are an idiot. NO MORE. I will go to court over this if I have to...............

Link to post
Share on other sites

HTH (Hope This Helps) RDM2006

 

THE FORCE (OF CAG) IS WITH YOU

;)

 

We've Helped You To Claim - Now Help Us Remain

A live Site - Make a Donation

 

All advice and opinions given by people on this site are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, please seek qualified professional legal Help.

 

However, if you have found any advice you have been given helpful.

Why not show your gratitude And

Click the * on the post you found helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

HI there

 

The short story is this. I had a business account with HSBC and a Business Loan. I took a calculated risk with my business to attend an even and it went pearshaped and thus experienced some financial difficulty and cash flow problems. I went to my local branch and explained the problem and they decided that the best way for me would be to consolidate my business loan (with PPI!) and my overdraft. They came up with a figure of £20,800 although I had originally borrowed £15,000 for the loan and had paid it for some 2 years - and my overdraft was £5,500.

 

Now, I trusted the bank (at that time!!!!:rolleyes: ) and thought they were acting in my best interests. However, the monthly payment for my business loan was £251 with PPI in case of illness and the monthly payment for the managed loan was £321 and obviously the insurance wasnt available.

 

Because of my financial difficulties I had to give up my business and have been left with this managed loan which I have been unable to pay. I calculate that there are charges included in the loan, possibly the PPI and, today when I got out the paperwork to check everything was OK, I noticed that the interest rates differ as follows:-

 

"Interest rate 10.95% over base (:o ) which at the date of the agreement gives a variable per annum rate of 15.700%."

 

However

 

Key Financial Information states

 

Amount of Loan: £20,800

Period of Loan in months: 144 :o

Annual Percentage Rate: 16.900%

 

This is wrong.

 

Bearing in mind that I think I have been shafted big time, do I have a case and is this agreement enforceable?

 

Any help would be gratefully received as I am getting bombarded with phone calls and I would like to send a letter putting them straight.

 

Kind regards

Gemspan

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...