Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SRJ say i owe Box Clever £800 debt


Rich44
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3377 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I had a letter from SRJ earlier this year claiming that I owed money to some company (I do not). I expect they scatter demands to names from the electoral register in the hope that one will reach the desired recipient. I sent them back the following (my details now obscured), they have not contacted me again.

 

-----

M Faithfull, Collections Manager

S R J Debt Recoveries Ltd

PO Box 1173

Woking

GU22 2BS

 

Date: 00/00/2000

Your ref: 00000000

 

Re: Trace 'confirmation' -

 

Dear Mr Faithfull,

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated 00/00/2000, claiming payment of an unpaid debt with your client . Please note that I have had no business or contact with the company named, and I do not owe them any money.

 

Your letter states that you believe you have traced the debtor named John Smith to my address, in which case you have made an error. I require that you amend your files to correct your mistake, and that if you have propagated this error in any way whatsoever that you correct the fault wherever it may lie. Should I discover at any time in the future that this has not been done I retain the right to hold you liable for any damages arising.

 

Should I be required to have any further dealings with your company, its agents or subsidiaries I give you notice that I shall at my discretion and without prejudice make a charge on you for my time at the rate of £60/hr and in addition recover any legal costs.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

John Smith

cc. Alice Smith and daughters, Solicitors

-----

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is selling our details ? and why are we getting these letters? We owe nothing!! Just heard on the radio today how T-mobile have sold on x clients details onto this kind of [causing problems] low life ****! put back in post marked 'not known at this address!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received letter from SRJ claiming that I have unpaid Gas bill in the flat I lived 3 years ago and moved out in August 2006. The bill is for period 11.04.06- 08.08.06. The thing is I have a bill paid, stamped by bank for period 11.04 - 27.07.06. When I was trying to explain to the srj employee that I have already paid for most of the period and even if there is outstanding bill I only should pay for the 27.06 - 08.08.06 he got aggressive, said that he has other people to talk to and hanged up! I also called British Gas and the not able to access the bill anymore and they seemed completely not interested in the fact that I have paid the bill 3 years ago. By the way British gas had always had my address because I had and still have account with them at every address I lived. they also have my phone number which they used when I was switching to EDF to talk me out of it. How come they are able to pass my details to other company without trying to contact me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, first post on here. :confused:

 

I first received a letter from SRJ asking for me to pay £284 because of Littlewoods and Phoenix (who???). Like an idiot and before coming on to this site I rang the 0845 number to question the debt.

 

Apparently I got an item in July 2003 from Littlewoods and haven't paid them..........."erm...what item please?"

 

A dvd home cinema unit/setup. "oh yes I remember...the one I sent back with the courier immediately because it was no longer required."

 

After further tooing and frowing I was asked to prove I sent the item back (receipt). Well, how could I it was over six years ago. "Right we'll take you to court!"

 

Sweating and worried I came to this site and found a little thing called Letter M.....the limitation act.

 

I duly wrote the letter (requesting an answer in writing) and sent it recorded delivery and waited.

 

On 6/11/09 I received a reply stating:

 

"We thank you for your recent communication and note the contents.

 

We confirm that we are taking instructions from our client and will revert to you shortly. In the meantime we have placed the account on hold."

 

So far so good!

 

Since then (whilst at work) they have rung me at home three times only getting an answer from my son. I decided to ring them myself tonight to see what transpired only to be met with the usual..............for security reasons may I have .....etc....

 

I refused to give the details of course (learnt now you see!) and thus ended the call by saying that all future correspondence should be made in writing.

 

My question is......can they do this after my original leetter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Folks,

 

Just found this site through searching for AOL Debt recovery on google.

 

Got a couple of letters from these idiots about an outstanding amount from an account I had with AOL over 2 years ago. Which i cancelled, I remember sending them the e-mail saying please cancel it.

 

After some abusive phone calls from these clowns, I decided to phone AOl, who were as much good as a fart in a space suit tbh. They couldnt confirm that they had received my e-mail to cancel it, they couldnt put me onto anyone that would help what so ever.

 

So after looking through my old AOL e-mail account, I have absoluteley nothing in there apart from an e-mail i received on Tuesday 15th of December this year...

 

My main concern is that I obviously have no proof that i've sent this e-mail to cancel it and im going to be plagued by these idiots.

 

Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I had a demand off Roxbrugh told them conversation was being recorded and to prove that I owed AOL money[i dont-never had AOL]. Was polite but assertive and thought that was that.This was in the summer never thought anything about it till I recieved a letter from SRJ two weeks ago. So far just ignored it and heard nothing.Do you think they've forgotten about me? Interested to read that the mastercard logo on their missives is illegal, should'nt somebody call the police or something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have recently received a letter from srj stating that I have failed to respond to previous letters from them and that they have traced me me to my current address, they want me to make a payment but the letter doesn't state how much I 'supposedly' owe or who I owe it to. I was curious because I did move 3years ago & was worried that maybe someone from my previous address had managed to get my details & use them to get credit in my name. I created an account with srj in the hope it would show details of so called debt but it doesn't & they have failed to respond to my three emails requesting this information. Do they really expect people to throw money at them without knowing what it's for? also to create an account with them it's mandatory that you include a telephone number, as I don't have a land line I put an old dissused mobile number in & am really glad that i did after reading about the harrassments from these people by phone.

:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have recentley received the letter from srj,trace to current address etc..the letter has a reference number and is in my name but does not state what it relates to.. a ploy for me to ring them?"if" i ring them can i legally record the conversation?.i don,t owe anybody any funds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have recently received a letter from srj stating that I have failed to respond to previous letters from them and that they have traced me me to my current address, they also say that talk talk who i alledgedly owe money to have tried to contactme on numerous occasions but i rang talk talk and they have no record of me with them.

So in short SRJ Dept recoveries want me to make a payment of 44 pounds from an account with talk talk, who i have never been with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

today I have received another letter from SRJ this time with details from a debt they say is with Talk Talk (formerly Tiscali) I was with Tiscali but when I ceased to have a land line, I contacted them by phone to cancel my subscription. some months later I noticed that the payments were still being taken out of my bank, When I phoned tiscali to ask why, they said that it was up to me to cancel the direct debit & because they could see that there had been no usage for those months that when/if I became able to rejoin them they would credit those months to me (fair enough). I promptly cancelled my Direct Debit & have not heard anything about this until now & that was over 3 years ago, now SRj are saying that they are 'pending litigation proceedings'.

Because I can't prove when I cancelled my subscription I am beginning to worry. What should I do? please give me good advice to get these people off my back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was once with Tiscali and had a problem with them, when cancelling my broadband and going over to virgin media, they said they said i had not cancelled, and wanted the money, i informed them that they had given me a date for cancelation, and cut me off and they had given me a pin number that i had to pass on to virgin so they could start me on their broadband, after that conversation i had heard nothing until the letter dropped through my door, that was over 3 years ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting ellsbells57 and parkesy, exactly the same thing has happened to me. I suspect the best option is to write to them and dispute that you owe them money. They then have 28 days to respond to your letter and proove that you owe them the money. (I received my letter yesterday).

 

They must put your account on hold at this time whilst they investigate and they must not contact you until they have this evidence of you oweing them money.

 

Be strong, have a bit of a giggle about it and don't get stressed. Your details have clearly been passed around a bit and there is no way that this debt can be proven which is why it has taken so long to sort out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

JuJu77,

 

do not call these people (or make sure you withold your number)....once they have your number they will call you! Ask Sky first, then if they have no record of this debt ignore the letters from SRJ.

 

Remember, this company buys debts from other companies and tries all it can to get the money back (fair means and foul!).

 

Don't be bullied into paying and ignore their threats.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent an email to sjr to find out what info they know of when i left my address and when the sky contract was finished. But left out my phone number and since I sent the email on Thursday I've still not revived any reply from them. So I'm taking this up with sky to see what they have to say. I'd rather sort out any debt i may have with them than some crappy company...

Link to post
Share on other sites

SRJ are the third debt recovery company to try to obtain money from me for services never contracted or received. Their client is TalkTalk, and I have never had a TalkTalk account. These two companies now seem to be well matched in their complete lack of comprehension of the English language and decent trading behaviour, exacerbated by inappropriate administrative systems. Although sorry that other people are experiencing similar problems, I am somewhat relieved to discover through this forum that I am not the only one whom they are bullying.

If they do decide to take me to Court, I am looking forward to speaking to a Judge who can read account information, correspondence and contracts - I trust that I will be reimbursed my expenses. I have sent reams of paperwork by recorded delivery and received confirmation of account closure, but the demands keep coming in with no supporting information.

(I have no problems with my Banking providers, who have been corporate trusted friends to me, with no unfair charges.)

Edited by Forget-me-not
spelling mistake, plus other matters whilst I am reviewing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Jimlad2,

 

I had a Tiscali broadband account for a regrettable year, but the account was closed after they eventually repaid the money that they took above and beyond what was owed at termination of contract. When I opened the account there was a separate TalkTalk service, which would have involved terminating my existing phone provider service which I most certainly did not do. There is such poor communication between their staf and departments that I now suspect that it is a policy for them to deduct monies above and beyond what is actually contracted or purchased, relying upon busy people's inability to make sense of their account information or keep track of their bills (they have a hectic website), or just to pay up to be free of the hassle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny that, they also took too much money from me but I couldn't cope chasing them for this. I was just happy to no longer be a customer. And yet they still sell a "debt" to a debt collection agency. Typical of Tiscali I would say. I am awaiting my letter informing me I am going to court from SRJ. They haven't provided proof that I owe any money so I am still ignoring their letters. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Had a number of letters from SRJ regarding a debt run up for Sky in a address I moved out off in 2001 and the debt is for 2005. I sent them edited P60s showing the change off address. But they are still after me and are saying they did not recieve information (couldnt send recorded post due too P.O box :???:). Im kinda ignorant regarding this kind of thing any advice would be helpful :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This company seems to only be interested in collecting money. As you have provided them with proof that you were not living at this address I would ignore them. Best bet is not to contact them by telephone, if you really want to correspond with them write a letter. Do not give them a telephone number.

 

They are chancers who hope that people will just pay because they are scared of being taken to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you really nwant to send them a recorded delivery letter here is their address according to companies house

 

Name & Registered Office:

SRJ DEBT RECOVERIES LIMITED

52 NEW TOWN

UCKFIELD

EAST SUSSEX

TN22 5DE

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3377 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...