Jump to content


gatecrasher2 vs Abbey


gatecrasher2
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4819 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The court are moving my case to my local court. Does anybody know how long it takes for AQ to arrive?

 

Have you seen this?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/78873-new-after-28-days.html#post696204

Nat West Settled 2 acct's before action:

 

£2194.77 settled £1904.00 08/01/2007 less interest

£650.93 Settled overpaid GOGW £850.00 02/01/2007

 

Applied Abbey statements -40 day up 24/04/06(arrived 30/06/06)

Prem 04/01/2007 - reply rcvd 22nd Jan advising not paying

LBA 22/01/07

 

14/02/07 N1 filed @ local court

21/02/07 issued claim

23/02/07 deemed served

25/02/07 Abbey acknowledgement defend in full.

19/03/07 defence + 50% GOGW

13/04/07 AQ final day for submission

30/04/07 DEFENCE STRUCK OUT "ABUSE OF PROCESS"

01/05/07 Judgement order

8/05/07 Warrant of Execution requested

 

 

Media coverage :D

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6701231.stm

 

http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/Article.aspx?articleID=4505

 

 

If you find my post helpfull then please click my scales:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Received Abbey's AQ. They have applied for a 1 month stay to enable further negotiation. They have had plenty of time to negotiate!! Would it be wrong of me to request the stay is removed due to their lack of sincere dialogue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

IT IS ORDERED THAT

1. The claim be stayed as it makes no serious attempt to comply with CPR 16.4(1) by setting out a concise statement of the facts. (Stylised particulars do not contitute compliance).

The claimant must amend or substitute its particulars of claim setting out the claimant's case in plain english by 4pm 27 June 2007 and in default, the claim be struck out without further notice.

If the above order is complied with the defendant has permission to file and serve an amended defence in accordance with CPR 16.5 setting out its case in plain english.

Dated 21 May 2007

 

Yep, it took them 3 weeks to send me this ruling !!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 9 months later...

Had a letter from AN cancelling my overdraft. This has now put me a month behind with my mortgage with another load of dd's bounced (for which they'll probably charge)!!!

 

Would this be grounds to get the stay on my case lifted on "undue hardship" grounds????

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...