Jump to content


gatecrasher2 vs Abbey


gatecrasher2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5737 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

Received Abbey's AQ. They have applied for a 1 month stay to enable further negotiation. They have had plenty of time to negotiate!! Would it be wrong of me to request the stay is removed due to their lack of sincere dialogue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

IT IS ORDERED THAT

1. The claim be stayed as it makes no serious attempt to comply with CPR 16.4(1) by setting out a concise statement of the facts. (Stylised particulars do not contitute compliance).

The claimant must amend or substitute its particulars of claim setting out the claimant's case in plain english by 4pm 27 June 2007 and in default, the claim be struck out without further notice.

If the above order is complied with the defendant has permission to file and serve an amended defence in accordance with CPR 16.5 setting out its case in plain english.

Dated 21 May 2007

 

Yep, it took them 3 weeks to send me this ruling !!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 9 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...