Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Women-only co-working spaces are part of the new hybrid working landscape, but they divide opinion.View the full article
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • The EV maker slashes more jobs and brings forward new models as profits drop by more than half.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Kat v HSBC ****WON****


Katteh
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6186 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

probably seen this before - if it is today - try pressing the button at 3 - no can do - try pressing it at 4 and guess what - a defence has been filed.

no harm pressing the button -

once it shows they have defended - don't call anybody - you'll get the court papers in 2-3 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Got the defence through the post yesterday with the AQ papers. I've read through some threads but have seen a bit of conflicting information. Is it best to submit the AQ sooner rather than later, or wait until the last minute to submit? Also is there any point in communicating with DG at this point to maybe get on their radar now that it's at this stage, or will it just annoy them and make them more reluctant to deal with mine?

 

Thanks in advance. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wrote it all out in great detail for dickydido? yesterday - that may help.

 

just checked - that's great detail for the aq

 

as for filing - i say later but don't miss deadline as why spend another 100 you will need to add to the claim - when they may offer within this time frame.

 

wouldn't hurt to drop them a note - saying you will shortly be filing your aq and it will raise the cost of your claim - or call - but don't bug them. one call or e-mail or post is sufficient. if you call - you may actually get through as we are now advising not to bug them - they maybe put their phones back on the hook by now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll check that out thanks lateralus.

 

Right - I am about to file my AQ now, I've read over a lot for this but my head is just spinning with the amount of info to take in. So, I'm sending my AQ to the court they've told me to. Do I need to send a copy to DG? If so, do I just photocopy it? Am I right in understanding that I don't send anything along with the AQ form, just the lone form?

 

Thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I need to send a copy to DG? If so, do I just photocopy it?
Only as a courtesy, you don't have to. But keep a copy for yourself anyway

 

Am I right in understanding that I don't send anything along with the AQ form, just the lone form?

1. Schedule of charges if you haven't previously sent 1 to DG

2. Draft Direction Order if you're going down that route

Otherwise nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have been delayed slightly with filing my AQ as I've been very busy with work and haven't had a chance to fill out the last bit. I am filling in section G "Other information" and I'm utterly clueless as to what I'm meant to write here. :confused: Is there some kind of template available which I could get some ideas from? I've looked around a lot but haven't been able to find anything like this. Thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you using the Draft Direction Order? If so see post#3 in the above link.

 

If not, use this:

I am respectfully requesting that my claim be allocated to the small claims track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument.

 

However, the continuing problem is, (in common with the 100s of other cases currently being brought by other bank customers), that the banks refuse to reveal the details of their penalty-charging regime. As the banks have a fiduciary duty towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly and in utmost good faith.

 

Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. This would bring a rapid end, not only to this litigation, but would also likely bring an end to much of the litigation in progress against other high-street banks.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay thank you. So just to clarify before I print/send this off. At this point I send the court my AQ questionnaire with the long version of section G - other information, and the draft order for directions (on 2 separate sheets) Then when the judge comes back in a couple of weeks time to me, I then have to file all information in the order for directions?

 

Is the draft direction order in post #2 of the link you gave me, the up to date version?

 

Also, in the last paragraph of the section G - other information it says...

 

As the law relating to contractual penalties is long established, the Claimant believes the outstanding issues to be of fact. Accordingly, the Claimant respectfully requests that this claim be allocated to the small claims track, and estimates that the hearing of the claim should last no longer than one hour.

 

As my claim is already at the small claims track does this still need to be said?

 

Sorry for all the questions (and repeatativeness), I just really don't want to mess up at this point. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then when the judge comes back in a couple of weeks time to me, I then have to file all information in the order for directions?

 

Correct, assuming he agrees to the draft order, you will be notified what is required.

 

Is the draft direction order in post #2 of the link you gave me, the up to date version?

 

 

Yes

 

As my claim is already at the small claims track does this still need to be said?

Yes, because although your claim may be below £5000, it hasn't actually been allocated to Small Claims. That's what the Aq is for, for the judge to decide which track is most suitable.
Link to post
Share on other sites

when you've filed - look for my "when you've filed your aq" thread - this is exactly when you want it - to sooth a little nervousness, see what happens next and some ideas for the next few weeks in your claim.

we are still all here - right behind you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay so I have one envelope to my local court with AQ and 2 additional sheets paperclipped on, and I have one envelope with the AQ photocopied and 2 additional sheets paperclipped on, and a cover letter "please find enclosed etc..". Last question for now I promise!! Do I need any cover letter to the court? Or am I ready to go?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...