Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

s.85 gang vMBNA


iwannabedebtfree
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6218 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

thought id open up a new thread for all those taking action under section 85 CCA 1974 against MBNA, sort of a support and update thread :p

 

notice of default was faxed off today, with a copy going in the post to Mr Wareing (bet he hates the attention he gets), so hopefully i will get the usual letter saying we have 30 days to deal with your complaint under FSA rules! who knows, but good luck to all that are taking back the right!

Thanks

 

 

 

23/11/06 HSBC **SETTLED**

30/12/06 - GE Capital - **SETTLED**

30/12/06 - MBNA - charges and interest **SETTLED**

 

30/12/06 - Welcome Finance - Prelim sent for mis-sold PPI

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

good idea!

 

There seems to be 2 camps on this - those that are saying they are AUTOMATICALLY in default so no need to issue notice, and others that are issuing notices - same result different route I guess. Keep them running around though won't it! They now have 4 days to respond to my prelim. letter re S85 -and of course, will be interested to hear outcome of Battleaxe's call with dear old Bill on Thursday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Ladybird

 

it will be interesting to hear from Battleaxe on thursday! i understand your point re: default. from reading the legislation my personal thought is that the default is automatic, but i decided to send the default incase MBNA ever go to court to try to say that they had not received the default.

 

A company the size of MBNA must know about the CCA and employ their legal team to understand the legalities of CCA and s85. They have obviously overlooked this, and hoped that their customers are none the wiser! It would be nice to be a fly on the wall within MBNA HQ when they discuss how to deal with s85. as i am only dealing with one re-issue of a card, yet i know i was re-issued a few cards! good luck with your pre-lim.

Thanks

 

 

 

23/11/06 HSBC **SETTLED**

30/12/06 - GE Capital - **SETTLED**

30/12/06 - MBNA - charges and interest **SETTLED**

 

30/12/06 - Welcome Finance - Prelim sent for mis-sold PPI

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Ladybird

 

it will be interesting to hear from Battleaxe on thursday! i understand your point re: default. from reading the legislation my personal thought is that the default is automatic, but i decided to send the default incase MBNA ever go to court to try to say that they had not received the default.

 

A company the size of MBNA must know about the CCA and employ their legal team to understand the legalities of CCA and s85. They have obviously overlooked this, and hoped that their customers are none the wiser! It would be nice to be a fly on the wall within MBNA HQ when they discuss how to deal with s85. as i am only dealing with one re-issue of a card, yet i know i was re-issued a few cards! good luck with your pre-lim.

 

Hi there guys, good idea for thread! I have mentioned S85 and sent the wording as an attachment to my letter Bill. Will issue default if necessary, depending on response to my letter.:cool:

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Battleaxe has had her conference call cancelled for tomorrow as Bill "has been called out of office" - they have asked her to arrange another day next week, but she is in two minds whether to go ahead with it now - who knows what they're planning?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Battleaxe has had her conference call cancelled for tomorrow as Bill "has been called out of office" - they have asked her to arrange another day next week, but she is in two minds whether to go ahead with it now - who knows what they're planning?

 

Morning Ladybird, I have already posted on her thread. I don't think she should enter into any more phone conversations with them. I would keep everything in writing and let them defend themselves in Court. If they can.....that is!

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it does seem that MBNA are playing their usual game of hide and seek, usually they come out when the courts catch them with a nice N1!

Thanks

 

 

 

23/11/06 HSBC **SETTLED**

30/12/06 - GE Capital - **SETTLED**

30/12/06 - MBNA - charges and interest **SETTLED**

 

30/12/06 - Welcome Finance - Prelim sent for mis-sold PPI

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 85 (Consumer Credit Act) states that every time you are issued with a new card (i.e. subsequent to the first, - card expired, lost, issue of new chip & pin etc) you should be sent, with it, a copy of the original Agreement. Generally, this DOES NOT happen. It appears, therefore, that the lender would be in breach of the CCA and has defaulted under the terms of the act. Hope this makes sense!

 

 

If I have been of any help, please click the scales on the bottom left hand corner, - I'm not an expert, these are just my understandings, or opinions!

Link to post
Share on other sites

will/bill will get a copy of my notice of default under s.85 tomorrow

Thanks

 

 

 

23/11/06 HSBC **SETTLED**

30/12/06 - GE Capital - **SETTLED**

30/12/06 - MBNA - charges and interest **SETTLED**

 

30/12/06 - Welcome Finance - Prelim sent for mis-sold PPI

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 85 (Consumer Credit Act) states that every time you are issued with a new card (i.e. subsequent to the first, - card expired, lost, issue of new chip & pin etc) you should be sent, with it, a copy of the original Agreement. Generally, this DOES NOT happen. It appears, therefore, that the lender would be in breach of the CCA and has defaulted under the terms of the act. Hope this makes sense!

 

 

If I have been of any help, please click the scales on the bottom left hand corner, - I'm not an expert, these are just my understandings, or opinions!

So Ladybird if they are in breach / default of the act how does that benefit the account holder ?

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Ladybird if they are in breach / default of the act how does that benefit the account holder ?

 

As I understand it Stornoway, they can't enforce the debt and they are in breach if they do not provide the agreement with the reissue of the card within one month of said reissue.

 

Correct me if I'm wrong people...........!

 

In my view, this is why MBNA are so twitchy with Battleaxe (see her thread, Battleaxe does MBNA). She is a brave girl and is hitting them where it hurts! Will be interesting to see how they react to her S85 Default.:)

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it Stornoway, they can't enforce the debt and they are in breach if they do not provide the agreement with the reissue of the card within one month of said reissue.

 

Correct me if I'm wrong people...........!

 

In my view, this is why MBNA are so twitchy with Battleaxe (see her thread, Battleaxe does MBNA). She is a brave girl and is hitting them where it hurts! Will be interesting to see how they react to her S85 Default.:)

Thanks

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

No probs. Are you going to follow suit?! I have mentioned it in my complaint to Bill/Will but will not do it til I get a response (see my thread MBNA Nightmare!).

 

I personally think that everybody should hit them with it and it will have a huge impact.

 

Go on Stornoway, I dare ya!!!!;):D

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

s.85:

 

Duty on issue of new credit-tokens.

 

(1) Whenever, in connection with a credit-token agreement, a credit-token (other than the first) is given by the creditor to the debtor, the creditor shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it.

(2) If the creditor fails to comply with this section--

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

(3) This section does not apply to a small agreement.

Notes:

 

Act excluded by S.I. 1983/1553, reg. 2(7A) (as inserted by S.I. 1984/1600, reg. 2(e)), S.I. 1989/869, arts. 2(1), 3(1), 4(1), 5, 6

 

 

NB PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THERE IS A CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 2006. Not yet read it but it modifies CCA 1974. Not yet in force, but parts of it come into force in April 07 I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

s.85:

 

Duty on issue of new credit-tokens.

 

(1) Whenever, in connection with a credit-token agreement, a credit-token (other than the first) is given by the creditor to the debtor, the creditor shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it.

(2) If the creditor fails to comply with this section--

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

(3) This section does not apply to a small agreement.

Notes:

 

Act excluded by S.I. 1983/1553, reg. 2(7A) (as inserted by S.I. 1984/1600, reg. 2(e)), S.I. 1989/869, arts. 2(1), 3(1), 4(1), 5, 6

 

 

NB PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THERE IS A CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 2006. Not yet read it but it modifies CCA 1974. Not yet in force, but parts of it come into force in April 07 I think.

 

Hello, have just had a very quick scan of the 2006 Act. In the summary of modifications, I can't see any reference to Section 85.

 

Don't take my word for it though, have a look guys!

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just subscribing to this thread. For all of you who haven't read it (and it is enormous), read the 'Consumer Credit Act Agreements' where all aspects of s85 have been discussed to death (I realise most people on here are subsribers to that thread, but I'm just advertising that to other people who may be reading this and would like to know more of the background).

 

I sent off my s85 default to MBNA on the 29th January 2007 (along with 2 other requests (S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and CCA 1974 s78 ) in separate envelopes. Will hit them with further letters in due course to really, really stir up the mix.

 

And all because a precocious little irish supervisor I spoke to thought he would be clever and talk over me and try to brow beat me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NB PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THERE IS A CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 2006. Not yet read it but it modifies CCA 1974. Not yet in force, but parts of it come into force in April 07 I think.

 

This won't affect this much as it will only apply from the date it comes in. New laws don't apply backwards in time so it will only cover new cards sent out after Apr 07 or whenever it comes out.

 

By the way as it doesn't seem to have been mentione don this thread yet the fact that the debt is unenforceable during a default means they shouldn't have charged interest on it either.

 

However I'm only up to page 12 (it's heavy going!) of the main thread about this so I could be wrong.

If you found this post useful please click on the scales above.

 

Egg - £400 - Prelim sent. On hold.

Mint - On the list Est £800

GE Capital - On the list (3 accounts!) Est £4000

 

MBNA - £545 Prelim sent 13/11/2006

LBA sent 1/12/2006

£350 partial payment received 18/12/2006.

Full settlement received 20/1/07

 

NatWest - Est £4000 not incl interest

Data Protection Act Sent 10/1/07

Statements received 24/1/07

Prelim sent 3/2/07

Full Settlement received 22/2/07

 

The contents of this post are the sole opinions of The Cornflake and not necessarily the opinions of any other members of this group. They do not constitute sound legal or financial advice and if in doubt you are advised to seek advice from a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cornflake - makes good reading that thread doesn't it?

 

This thread is pretty much about what you have said - because they are apparently in breach of S85, they are in default & debt unenforceable. A number of us have started down this route, and iwannabedebtfree started this thread to separate this issue from the Credit Agreement thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,sorry for jumping in here but I have been browsing on this site and I see section 85 cca to do with credit cards. I have gone on this site as mbnachickens as I think of the advert on the telly when I speak to them.

They took over a loan I had with bank of scotland so does that mean I should have had a copy of the original agreement when they took over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how/if S85 relates to a loan as we have been looking at this from the credit card angle. I'll have a look at the act & see what I can find out - of course one of my learned colleagues may be able to step in and be able to answer you. Get back to you on it. You may want to look at the thread Consumer Credit Agreements - very long and a bit complicated, but if you have the time to read through it, it may clarify some thngs for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

S85 doesn't apply to loans as there is no credit token issued that can be used to purchase goods (i.e. credit card).

 

To put you in the right direction, you need to send a section 77 request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Do as Ladybird suggests and look through 'Consumer Credit Agreements' thread. There are a number of template letters you can use to send to MBNA for a copy of the agreement. You will need to send a cheque / postal order for £1 along with your letter.

 

Anybody who wants to take the fight to MBNA will get all of the help I can give!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs. Are you going to follow suit?! I have mentioned it in my complaint to Bill/Will but will not do it til I get a response (see my thread MBNA Nightmare!).

 

I personally think that everybody should hit them with it and it will have a huge impact.

 

Go on Stornoway, I dare ya!!!!;):D

 

Long story .....I have a s78 in course but only sent it last week. My card is about 15 years old was originally with "Robert Fleming" then they were taken over by "Save and Prosper" (they were a friendly society / building society from memory) then they sold their card business to MBNA. I'll be absolutely amazed if they can find the agreement. I've successfully claimed £3500 in charges and interest from MBNA but this was applied to the account which is now with a DCA (has been sold / assigned). What I ultimately want is default removal and presumably if they cant find the agreement then they cant report the default to CRAs ?

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...