Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Alliance and leicester fined by FOS for retaliatory account closure


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5932 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The Ombudsman has just adudicated in a complaint against the A&L on a complaint that they closed a customer account in response to a claim for bank charges.

 

The FOS decided that the closure was indeed unfair as it was punitve and retaliatory.

The awarded £125 against the bank.

 

this is a derisory figure of course but the ruling is highly significant.

 

If you have had your accont closed by any bank because you have cliamed bank charges - or if you have been threatened with account closure then we suggest that you begin an immeiate complaint to the Ombudsman.

 

You will have to get a final decision from your bank first.

 

The more complaints which are made, the more likely the banks are to stop this vindictive and churlish treatment of their customers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

bankfodder

 

thanks for the info

 

can you provide a link to the info with regards to the ruling, so we can have a looksee?

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't see anything on the FOS website, itsa, they seem not to publish individual rulings. Maybe BF got it from the complainant.

 

However, there is an interesting letter from the FOS's Jane Hingston to the Independent(?) Banking Codes Review. Draw your own conclusions!

 

news and information

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a copy of the decision. The complainant will himself be putting up a thread in the next few days and the press have just been informed.

 

I suggest that anyone wishing to complain do so immediately - even if one threats have been made.

 

Once people get to know about this there may be a bit of a rush and a backlog may develop.

 

Unfortunately you will have to exhaust the bank's procedures first so it is all timeconsuming.

Still, make the complaint anyway. It creates additioanl pressure and additional awareness - and of course if there is £125 going then it is better in your pockets than in theirs - but you know that, don't you!! :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so glad that the FOS are finally coming under pressure to pull banks up on this matter.

Clearly in breach of FSA regulations regarding "treating customers fairly".

I think I will be including the ruling in all futute correspondence with the banks that I am dealing with!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have had your accont closed by any bank because you have cliamed bank charges - or if you have been threatened with account closure then we suggest that you begin an immeiate complaint to the Ombudsman.

 

You will have to get a final decision from your bank first.

.

 

Isn't that a contradiction in terms?

 

Regardless, and even though they haven't closed the account so far, I have plenty of evidence against Halifax that they use the threat to try and dissuade people, so that's going to get done ASAP.

 

Thanks for that information, BF. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Tracey284

Great to see this and am anxious to learn more. HSBC have threatened to close my husband's account and asked for all cheque books, etc. back by mid Feb. This was in answer to us claiming back bank charges. Any direction would be greatly appreciated in complaining to the ombudsman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great to see this and am anxious to learn more. HSBC have threatened to close my husband's account and asked for all cheque books, etc. back by mid Feb. This was in answer to us claiming back bank charges. Any direction would be greatly appreciated in complaining to the ombudsman.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/43287-financial-ombudsman-recommendation.html?highlight=ombudsman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Forum,

 

The Financial Ombudsman has awarded me £125 compensation as a result of the treatment I received from Alliance & Leicester when they forcibly closed my account after I sued them.

 

It was not the Adjudicators place to comment on the merits of the original action but nevertheless I was entitled to bring as is my legal right under consumer protection legislation and common law. Consequently Alliance & Leicester are not treating their customers fairly by deliberately deterring such actions with the threat of account closure.

 

I quote verbatim,

 

"He should not be prevented from bringing a legitimate complaint by the threat of having his account closed; nor do I consider it fair or reasonable of Alliance & Leicester to respond to his complaint about charges by closing the account. Alliance & Leicester appears to me to have used the closure of the account as a retaliatory or punitive measure".

 

Suffice to say that this decision was far more satisfying than the £200 I claimed back for bank charges back in June 2006.

 

The key thing to remember is that you have to exhaust the complaints procedure with the firm first of all before you refer to the FOS. You must obtain a 'Final Decision Letter' from the firm that states they cannot do anymore with the complaint and that if you remain disatisfied you can refer the matter to the Financial Ombudsman within 6 months - this is crucial.

 

The FSA rulebook defines what a 'FDL' is and so it must contain these magic words in order for your complaint to be heard by the FOS.

 

Good Luck and all the best

 

Wez1211.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

just stumbled across this thread.I recently asked First direct to refund charges, which they, after a lot of secure messaging back and forth, at last have done.ut their last message to me was following:

Message From Bank

-----------------------------------------------

Operator ID : xxxxxx

Date : 04/01/2007

Subject : Account Management (debt Management)

 

Dear jellybabe

 

I'm sorry you've felt the need to write to smile about the charges applied to your account and about the time it's taken to reply to you.

 

After reviewing your complaint a refund of the charges applied to your account has been agreed. As such, a total of £140.00 has now been returned as a gesture of goodwill.

 

I have also adjusted the charges that you will receive notification of on 05/01/07. Please ignore this notification as the charges will not debit your account. Could I please bring to your attention that we will not refund any further charges unless there has been a bank error. Any further requests for a refund (unless bank error) may result in us giving you 30 days notification to close your account.

 

At this stage we are required to let you know that smile will regard the complaint as closed if we do not receive a reply within 8 weeks of this response.

 

If you remain unhappy you may ask for your complaint to be referred to the Financial Ombudsman Service. Full details are on our website, Redirecting to Smile Production Site / talk to us / complaints.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Jane Cliff

smile Customer Services Manager

well, now i just been informed that they try to charge me another £30 in unauthorised O/D charges, because it took them a week to put the money back into my account, and by then ,of course, the new statement date has passed.

Any advice on what i could do? I don't want them to close my account as i have £500 O/D and won't be able to pay it all back in one go.

Thanks in advance for any advice given.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Much thanks for posting this excellent news. This is a great victory, and I am quite surprised that the ombudsman actaully made a decent decision.

If you found this post useful please click on the scales above.

 

Egg - £400 - Prelim sent. On hold.

Mint - On the list Est £800

GE Capital - On the list (3 accounts!) Est £4000

 

MBNA - £545 Prelim sent 13/11/2006

LBA sent 1/12/2006

£350 partial payment received 18/12/2006.

Full settlement received 20/1/07

 

NatWest - Est £4000 not incl interest

Data Protection Act Sent 10/1/07

Statements received 24/1/07

Prelim sent 3/2/07

Full Settlement received 22/2/07

 

The contents of this post are the sole opinions of The Cornflake and not necessarily the opinions of any other members of this group. They do not constitute sound legal or financial advice and if in doubt you are advised to seek advice from a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi can we do the same to egg, they have settled bank charges full refund but have closed , credit account... now paying back balance monthly?????

Only direct action by the masses will work....

 

Look at all successes they have never come from negotiation!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm gobsmacked - what a ruling.

 

Excellent victory - time I complained about them closing my account too then :D

 

Cheers

 

Michael

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by BankFodder viewpost.gif

If you have had your accont closed by any bank because you have cliamed bank charges - or if you have been threatened with account closure then we suggest that you begin an immeiate complaint to the Ombudsman.

 

You will have to get a final decision from your bank first.

.

Isn't that a contradiction in terms?

 

Regardless, and even though they haven't closed the account so far, I have plenty of evidence against Halifax that they use the threat to try and dissuade people, so that's going to get done ASAP.

 

Thanks for that information, BF. ;-)

That's the 8 week thing, (put the complaint in writing blah blah, wait for 8 weeks to hear nothing or be fobbed off) the ombudsman are very meticulous about this as i found out recently. I was even asked by the ombudsman to send a letter telling them the 8 weeks had expired.

HSBC closed my account.

This is truly great news. :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that's fantastic.

 

If anyone fancies a laugh, they could read this:

 

BBC NEWS | Business | Bank bars overdraft charge rebels

 

Well, that backfired a little, didn't it? ;-)

  • Haha 1

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds has sent me a closure letter in July, then changed their mind after I spoke with my account manager. Then, in December, after settling my second claim, they have cloed my account, with balance transfered towards my personal loan, without notification, without my agreement or even a courtesy note. I am furious and wrote:

I find it exceptionally disappointing. It is an implied term of the contract between the firm and its customer that the firm will not normally close the customer’s account without giving reasonable notice. The Banking Code says that, in normal circumstances, firms should give customers at least 30 calendar days’ notice before closing their accounts.

 

You have not given me such notice and a previous notice has been rescinded by the Bank.

 

Your decision has caused me great anxiety and inconvenience. The FOS is likely to require the firm to pay compensation .(FSO News, issue 48, August 2005 “banking: when a firm decides to close a customer's account”).

Additionally, around the times of the above mentioned correspondence, the account was in dispute and I have issued a legal action, twice, against your Bank with regards to unlawful penalty charges. The Bank has settled on both occasions. After the first settlement you have threatened with me an account closure but after I spoke to one of your regional managers, we agreed to keep the account open in order to service the personal loan account. After the second settlement you have not even informed me that you have decided to settle my claim in full and you have closed my account. I have checked my account by complete coincidence and realised that you have refunded the money. I was lucky to check as the very next day (or even on the same day; I cannot check anymore because you have not even send me the final statement)- you have closed my account.

 

I could therefore argue that you have closed my account as a malicious, disproportionate reaction to my “penalty charges” complaint.

You have acted against an advice of your own professional body;

The Banking Code Standards Board .

You may want to note that the Ombudsman has just adjudicated in a complaint against the Alliance & Leicester on a complaint that the A&L closed a customer’s account in response to a claim for bank charges.

The FOS decided that the closure was indeed unfair as it was punitive and retaliatory. The FOS awarded £125 against the bank.

 

I am confident I would be able to convince the Ombudsman that I have been affected in a similar way by your decision.

I now request that you issue me with a 'Final Decision Letter' as I intend to take me complaint to the Financial Ombudsman.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I also asked for some clarification on this and got this reply from Emma Parker of the FOS.;

 

"We can and do look at complaints about difficulties in opening bank

accounts - just as we look at complaints about banks closing accounts.

Often these complaints involve other aspects and issues too - for

example, where the consumer has financial difficulties, and problems

have arisen in the relationship between the bank and the customer over

a

period of time. This is why we have to look at each case on an

individual basis, to see whether and how we can help given the

particular circumstances.

 

In the first instance we tell consumers to give the bank or building

society an opportunity to investigate the complaint and sort out the

problem. If this doesn't work - or you're not sure who to get in touch

with at the bank - you can contact us free for help on what to do next."

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic News - this is a great step forward and should be quoted / complained about at every opportunity. It is truly wrong that banks can use account closure as a threat and I am grateful to the FOS for taking such positive action. The more official complaints about bank account closures the banks receive and, in turn, are forwarded to the FOS once FDL's are received, the more pressured the regulators will be to make precedent setting decisions and rulings. Don't let up the pressure!

Link to post
Share on other sites

wez1211 - i wanted to let you know that you are a legend as far as i am concerned - congratulations on the ruling!

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well thats very encouraging I was wondering what I would do without any credit cards or bank accounts as I have just started this process. I will try to start a thread (if someone explains what to do ) to monitor my progress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, My OH had an account with A&L, and paypal took money out of her account by direct debit instead of her credit card, she was charged a huge sum of money and was on benefits at the time, she lost £80 that was paid into the account from the jobcentre.

 

She argued for 1 month and they closed her account and cleared the balance, her credit file shows a zero balance with no default.

 

Is it still worth complaining and do you think she will get the £80 back and would the account be re-opened?

 

Thanks

 

Kev

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...