Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My dad needs help !!! **SORTED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6401 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

About 4 1/2 years ago my dad bought a washing machine from Curry's, and with it a 4 year service warranty by mastercare coverplan to start when the manufacturers one year warranty expired. My dad ( 85 years old and still wobbling in the legs and brain ) paid the W/M in full on the day he bought it and the extended warranty by direct debit set up to take ten payments to pay the amount.

 

About 3 1/2 years after he bought the W/M a fault developed and he telephoned the number on the Mastercare coverplan leaflet. They arrranged an engineer to come out from Indesit to fix the W/M.

 

Nearly a year after the W/M was fixed Indesit write to my father saying that Mastercare will not settle the bill due to irregularities and also enclose an invoice to my father for approx £100.

 

My father phones Mastercare to see what is going on and they tell him the extended warranty was cancelled by them just before the manufacturers warranty finished.

 

My father writes to Mastercare to get full details and they reply because the last Direct debit payment was missed they cancelled the policy, they did not warn him of this or send any letters advising him to make a payment by a differant method for the last payment.

 

My father gets copies of statements for that period and see's that the last payment due was never requested by Mastercare and that there was sufficient funds in place as well.

 

My father writes back to Mastercare asking why they never took the last payment, he was astonished by their reply which said " It is up to the holder of the service plan agreement to ensure all D/D payments are met, and we also do not have to tell anyone when we cancel a policy ( anyone reading this count their D/D payments ??? ).

 

My father had paid up to £129 pounds with one payment to go and was feeling this could be one hell of a [problem], lets say you never claimed you would never know it would have happened.

 

Any way a few more letters back and forth to Coverplan got him nowhere, so I suggested trading standards, they wrote a very damning letter to Coverplan totally agreeing with my father and they ignored it.

 

I then got in touch with the financial ombudsman who said as it was not an insurance policy they could do nothing, I wrote back to them to remind them that they are called the the Financial Ombudsman Service not the Insurance Ombudsman Service and get your heads out the sand and actually earn your wages, this is still ongoing but they seem like all the other toothless so called services around.

 

I also emailed the BBC watchdog program who got back to me and ran through the problem and said they would be in touch at a later date as they were compiling quite a dossier of problems to do with Mastercare, so there may be hope there.

 

A couple of things have me thinking........

Why did Mastercare instruct Indesit to fix the fault when the policy was cancelled some 2 1/2 years prior.

Have Mastercare commited fraud and could I ask the police to look into it.

How many people have Mastercare done this to ?????

 

And lastly where does my dad go next to claim his money back in full !!!

IT IS MINE !!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I'm not suggesting your dad do this, unless he wants to, but I would let them take me to court for the payment.

 

He has evidence to prove that they didn't apply for the payment (for which I think the DD guarantee says that they will give 14 days notice for), and that there had never been a problem so reasonably he could expect to have the service in place still.

 

Basically, they made a cock up, and now they are trying to use that cock up to get out of paying.

 

I think a judge would see it that way too.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also,

 

an estoppel occurs when one party, by words or conduct, has led the other to believe

in the existence of a certain fact situation and the other party has acted to his to his

detriment in reliance on that fact situation. In these circumstances the party whose

conduct created the difficulty may be prevented (estopped) from denying the

existence of that relevant fact situation

and

estoppel is a rule of evidence (and not a cause of action) preventing a person from

denying the truth of a statement he has made previously, or the existence of facts in

which he has led another to believe (Curzon - Dictionary of Law)

 

I would say that by then paying to send someone out that they have acknowledged the fact that it was up to them to do so, despite their cock up.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, contact this woman.

 

Vikki Rogers on 0117 9858750 or email

[email protected]

 

She works for the BBC and is looking for this sort of story.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

A couple of things have me thinking........

Why did Mastercare instruct Indesit to fix the fault when the policy was cancelled some 2 1/2 years prior.

Have Mastercare commited fraud and could I ask the police to look into it.

How many people have Mastercare done this to ?????

 

And lastly where does my dad go next to claim his money back in full !!!

 

Hi sorry to here about the issuess your dad has come up against i work for indesit and can shed some ligt on this for you also if you pm me i may b able to help if my employer is hastaling for payment(I am not there happyes employee lol)

the contact center your dad would have phoned will be the mane contact center in peterborough (Indesit) as mastercare phone lines divert there calls to the service provider.

 

moste of the staff in this contact center will proces the engineer putrly on the policy details provided by your dad these are not always valid and when we invoice mastercare they will pay it or return it.

 

If the endineare sees a valid pol;icy when he comes out everyone is happy untill it gets to the point where the third party insurance refuses payment and we would then invoice the customer.

 

I must stress the contact center may as well be enhabited by traind chimps as there mane gole is to get the customer off the phone so they can take the next call so there is not to many checks dun.

 

As i say if indesit are hastling you for payment pm me and i will pas your info to our contact center director who would probably quash these charges as a good will gesture in order to look good if this was to go to the press (they cant afford bad press) Also you should phone the number on a currys recept and select option 1 this will put you through to a currys contact center then tell them you want to speak to someone at hemal hemsted (this is currys mastercare head office) when speaking to them they are normaly more helpfull than the basic call centerse.

 

Once again if you want contact me and i will se what can be dun at my end to ease the steress on your dad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Send in the balifs with the press it would be wonderfull to watch it on the news lol no but realy give them a bit of time and if nothing happens inform them that you will be sending them in if still nothing call in the big boys

 

P.S. i may not be at Indesit much longer got a disaplinary for grose misconduct on tue lmao:D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Mastercare reckon they did not receive the original claim form ( yeah right ) but only the judgement dated 15th August 2006, their parent company DSG retail are now dealing with this as they say mastercare was transferred to them in April 2006,they have applied to the court to get the judgement set aside because they think they have a real prospect of successfully defending the claim.

What will the court do ? What should I do ?

IT IS MINE !!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court will in all likelihood set aside the judgment. Do not let the "real prospect of successfully defend the claim" fool you, it does not mean they will win, or that they hae a killer defence, it just means that as they have missed the boat, the judge has to look at the case and decide: If they HAD received the claim, could they have put up a defence (not win, mind, just put up a defence!)? If the answer is yes, and it usually is, the judge will agree to the set aside, and set a date for hearing.

 

Then you do what you were set to do before you won by default, which is prepare your case to go to court, to convince the judge that in balance of probabilities, your case is better than their defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My dad's case has now been transferred to Cardiff County Court, but DSG dont want to appear they want the judge to decide on his own, my dad's wheelchair will be serviced for the ready !!!

What's the point of judgement if the defendant can put in a late submission of 6 weeks ???

IT IS MINE !!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the point of judgement if the defendant can put in a late submission of 6 weeks ???

 

I know what you mean, but it works both ways: We had a case here (Disneyman v Nationwide), he got a default againt him at Xmas, by February, he discovered about unlawful bank charges. He applied to get the judgment set-aside, was granted it, and by the time of the hearing, Nationwide folded, and ended up paying him some monies as well as not having a default anymore!

 

The over-riding objective is that the right judgment should be given, and a judgment by default is not (logically enough). I know it sucks from where you're standing, but don't lose heart, it's only a setback, not a loss. ;-)

 

my dad's wheelchair will be serviced for the ready !!!

Transco, is it? :-)

 

Keep us posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Congratulations....:D :D

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 10 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

IT IS MINE !!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6401 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...