Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Business Accounts ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6107 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Caro

 

yes I was told that when I submitted the AQ, of course we also have the Easter break to contend with. Still waited this long so a fer more days wont hurt. I will update as soon as I hear anything.

 

Lizzy

  • Haha 1

To Love & Be Loved Is The Essence Of Life

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi lizzy,

Just come across your thread here. Notice it's for a business claim (and you also seem to be doing admirably well).

Several of us Business claimants have started a thread dedicated to Business claims. A way of keeping each other informed of the various do's and don't of business claims. You seem to be quite advanced along with your claim, so perhaps a little late for you to learn too much from this at this point (not that I think you need to, as you seem to have taken all the right steps anyway)

Do come and join the thread anyway, as you may have some knowledge and experiences that you can share around with others.

Best regards

Photoman

PS: the link has hopefully appeared in my sig, otherwise I'll post it.

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update.

 

I have received an offer from Yorkshire for, can you believe it, LESS than 50% of the claim. They have also indicated that they wish to try mediation and have asked for a stay until 22/05/07.

 

The last paragraph states 'This offer will remain open for 7 days from todays date. This offer is made on an open basis. If it is not accepted, it will be drawn to the court's attention on the question of costs and your clients' unreasonableness in proceeding with the claim. We look forward to hearing from you (I bet they are, but they won't be hearing what they want to hear).

 

It is now my intention to open dialoque with them, in writing of course. I will be interested to hear how they came up with the amount they have offered.

 

I will be pointing out to them things like claiming beyond 6 years etc and that we are if necessary prepared to see the claim through to it's full conclusion.

 

Any comments anyone may have would be appreciated.

 

 

Lizzy

To Love & Be Loved Is The Essence Of Life

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lizzy,

 

bit of a slap in the face that one! Very insulting to offer less than 50%. I would be tempted to up the stakes. YB are putting on a front of business as usual following Whistleblower. But in reality they are running scared. Be firm and keep the pressure on.

 

All the best

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

caro, I have picked up a post you made in the following thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/yorkshire-bank-clydesdale-bank/51327-my-mum-2-yorkshire.html?highlight=debit+under+advice

 

quote: 'I had some debits under advice that I'm claiming for. They let some payments through which I don't think had anything to do with cheques, and I'm sure I didn't lose or have anything stolen, so I have claimed them. Also, I have now had YB's own version of what they charged me and they have included them. Can you tell me did they repay all of these amounts.

Could you please clarify the following for me, quote: 'Also when you complete your court claim and add on the 8% statutory interest, you can claim interest on the interest you are claiming, and if it goes back a long way that's worth having too'.

 

Thanx

 

Lizzy

To Love & Be Loved Is The Essence Of Life

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Will be sending the following to Miss Ross tomorrow unless anyone can make any suggestions or alterations.

Dear Ms Ross,

Account No: XXXXX

 

I refer to your letter of 10/04/07, regarding the above account.

I am writing this letter to you in good faith and as an indication of my willingness to enter into dialogue with you in an effort to bring this matter to a satisfactory conclusion.

This is not an indication that I am willing to accept your offer but merely an opportunity for some clarification and compromise on both sides.

In your recent communication you have made me an offer of £xxxx, I would be most interested to know how you have arrived at this figure and would very much appreciate a schedule listing the charges that your offer covers.

I was disappointed that you have not offered any interest on the charges particularly as there are some things which I have not claimed for i.e. hourly rate of £9.25 whilst compiling the claim, making a claim for charges prior to 6 six years which I now know I can do. Also the fact that I have only claimed statutory 8% interest and not contractual which would be significantly more.

I do not feel that your offer fully reflects the strain, anxiety and pressure that I was put under by your bank making these penalties despite speaking to my Branch Manager when I faced financial difficulty.

In view of the recent Whistle Blower programme and the revelations made regarding your banks operating practices in particular CYNtheSys I feel I have a very strong case and I am quite willing to see this matter through to its full conclusion through the courts unless you substantially increase the offer you have made.

 

 

 

Yours Faithfully

To Love & Be Loved Is The Essence Of Life

Link to post
Share on other sites

The advanced spreadsheet for bank charges in the bank templates library has extra columns, which take into account the debit interest on the charges. It may be worth your while to complete it and amend your claim.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Zooman

lizzy, the letter refers to clients are you claiming this for someone else, and if yes are they paying you?

 

sorry to ask, but I need to for my piece of mind, I have no issue with people doing this BTW, I would just like to know where my help went to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zooman if I remember right Lizzy is doing this on behalf of a friend of hers.

 

Sarah.

Yorkshire Bank

Started Process 19th Sept 2006.

All Stages Followed.

Next Step Court!

Hearing Date 7th June 2007.

WON!!!!! 6th June 2007 :D

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Example Step-By-Step Instructions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zoo,

As I said right from the start this claim is for a close friend of mine and no he is not paying me. I owe him a big favour for helping me out in the past and saw this as a good way of paying him back.

 

 

Lizzy

To Love & Be Loved Is The Essence Of Life

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update.

 

Following letter received from Ms Ross.

 

Without Prejudice save as to costs.

 

'Please find enclosed the Banks calculation which clarifies how the Bank came to its offer of £xxxxxx. The Bank is not prepared to increase this offer for the reasons set out below. Any application by you to amend your claim will be rigorously opposed by the Bank. The Bank is however, in the interests of reaching a commercial settlement, prepared to keep the offer open for acceptance to 30th April. The Bank believes this to be a fair offer in all circumstances.

 

As regards the further claims you believe you have:

 

1. A Claimant cannot charge for their time in bringing a claim. You therefore have no legal basis to claim for an hourly rate of £9.25 for time spent compiling the claim.

 

2. The Limitation Act 1980 provides that claims require to be brought within 6 years of the claim arising, otherwise the claim is barred.

 

3. It is for Claimants to bring whatever claim they believe they have. You have chosen to claim interest at the statutory rate and not the contractual rate. In any event, the Bank is not prepared to make any offer towards your claim for interest on the basis that interest is awarded at the courts discretion and the Bank does not believe the court would award interest in the circumstances of this case. The charges were incurred solely as a result of the manner in which you chose to run your account. The offer to refund them is made only on an ex gratia basis.

 

If you wish to acept please sign and return the enclosed duplicate of this letter, and the Notice of Discontinuance which the Bank will hold as undelivered until payment of the settlement sum has been made to you. Thereafter the Bank will lodge the Notice with the Court.

 

This letter is written only in an attempt to resolve this case without the need to incur further court time. it is therefore without prejudice to the Bank's whole rights and pleas and may not be referred to without the Bank's written consent. Please note however, that should this offer not be accepted by you, the Bank will refer the Court to this letter when deciding the costs to be awarded in the case.'

 

 

I would appreciate any comments anyone may have. I am currently checking the Bank's list of charges against the claim and will post my findings when this is complete.

 

 

Lizzy

To Love & Be Loved Is The Essence Of Life

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you suggested that you might amend your claim?

 

1. If your claim is allocated to fast or multi-track, ie is over £5,000 you can claim costs.

 

2. I assume you have quoted section 32 of the limitations act which covers this item.

 

3. Are they suggesting you should have claimed contractual interest? Whatever they think interest is at the courts discretion, and it is not for the bank to second guess what the court might or might no do.

 

Usual intimidatory stuff to try and fob you off. I suggest you write back and say thanks but no thanks.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

caro, could you please clarify about claiming for 'Debit Under Advice' as they have not allowed these on my claim.

 

Thank You

 

Lizzy

To Love & Be Loved Is The Essence Of Life

Link to post
Share on other sites

I claimed them and got them. I believe it was where they paid items, even if money was not available. They also omitted the overdraft interest that I claimed on their schedule but I got that too.

 

They can always let the judge decide.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - Following letter will be sent to Ms Ross unles someone edits .

 

 

I refer to your letter of 18/04/07, regarding the above claim the contents of which have been noted. In my continuing effort to reach an amicable solution to my claim I would like to point out the following.

1. s.32 of the Limitations Act will allow me to claim pre 6 years on the basis that the Whistleblower disclosures show that there has been concealment.

2. A Claimant can charge for their time in bringing a claim if it is allocated to fast track. As I had to complete a N150 AQ I strongly suspect that this claim will go that route.

3. As previously stated I do concede that there are some things I cannot claim. However, I am at a loss as to why you have not included ‘Debit Under Advice’ amounts in your offer, particularly as you have paid them to other claimants. Claim No. 6Q240257 In the Warwick County Court in January 2007 to name but one. Your inconsistency is both misleading and confusing.

Taking all the above into account, I would again ask you to review your offer. I now feel that I have given you every opportunity to reach a fair settlement in regard to this claim therefore if your reply does not reflect this I shall cease correspondence with you and continue with my claim through the courts. I will issue an N244 and will also be making an application to remove the stay, and pointing out to the court that as you have never actually taken a case through the courts you are simply using this as a delaying tactic. I would also respectfully remind you that the interest element as increasing by the day and you will of course be eligible to pay this when I win my case.

 

 

Would appreciate any comments.

 

Thanx

 

Lizzy

To Love & Be Loved Is The Essence Of Life

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claim number was 6QZ40257, and there were 20 debits under advice paid totalling £654.00.

 

I have some comments about this which I'd rather not post here, and possibly some additions. I'd also be interested in Zoots and others comments on this.

 

I'll get back to you later if that's ok, but if you want to make contact in the meantime email [email protected]

  • Haha 1
The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Following letter sent to Ms Ross on 27 April;

 

I refer to your letter of 18/04/07, regarding the above claim the contents of which have been noted.

Your schedule of charges has indicated that ‘Debit Under Advice’ is not claimable when I know that you have repaid these to other claimants, case no 6QZ40257 in the Warwick County Court to name but one.

As your offer is inconsistent and your comments somewhat confusing it is now my intention to issue an N244 and let the courts decide on the outcome. In view of the CYNthesys revelations I have no doubt that the court will find in my favour.

May I also point out that in your letter of 10 April 2007 you indicated that a copy of your allocation questionnaire was enclosed which, in fact it was not. Please therefore forward a copy at your earliest convenience.

 

 

Lizzy

To Love & Be Loved Is The Essence Of Life

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the N244 to add about CYNthesys to your claim?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi caro,

 

No - the N244 is to change the amount of the claim.

 

Having received a copy of their charges schedule which they based their offer figure on there are some things I claimed for which I should not have.

 

That said there are some things i.e. the Debit Under Advice charges which they say I cant claim but I am leaving on. Also they have missed some charges altogether.

 

Lizzy

To Love & Be Loved Is The Essence Of Life

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do they say you can't claim? Can you remind me what stage your claim is at? Has the case been stayed? If so, and you look at the court order you may find there is provision in that to amend the claim without the need for an N244.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi caro,

 

There were some charges included on the original claim that I now know I should not have included. However in their offer they have not included 'Debit Under Advice' and they have also missed some charges altogether.

 

I have not had a court order for the stay but they have asked for one on the Mediation Scheme Reply Form. I refused mediation and gave my reasons for doing so. I have not heard anything from the court since I sent the AQ on3 April. I know they are very busy but do you think I should chase them to see what the state of play is?

 

I am not going to do the N244 yet as you never know I may get a positive response from my last letter.

 

Thanx

 

Lizzy

To Love & Be Loved Is The Essence Of Life

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found it took about 5 weeks for the AQ to be looked at, which in my opinion is far too long. It's been 4 weeks now so I think it might be a good idea to give them a ring.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello again, have been away for a while due to ill health, but back on track now.

 

Have had another offer from YB but they have still not included the 'Debit Under Advice' charges.

 

Phoned the court on Friday and they have had the directions back from the Judge which they say will be sent shortly. Have therefore decided to hold fire on the N244 until I see what the Judge's Directions are.

 

I have still not received a copy of YB's AQ, are they in breech of anything by not ending me a copy?

 

Would appreciate any comments.

 

By the way caro love the new avatar, what you got brewing in that coldron lol.

To Love & Be Loved Is The Essence Of Life

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...