Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • i would suggest that you stick to researching on here only. use our search top right for say CTAX or liability order.   you seriously have some wild theories, but those are understandable.   as i have said, there won't be a court hearing you need nor would that help you at all nor are expected to attend, it's not like that, it's merely a rubberstamp exercise .   there is no right of forced entry for bailiffs collecting CTAX debts. the bailiff process is one of a letter which will be entitled Notice of enforcement, this gives you 7 days to pay the sum it outlines with an associated fee of £75 for it being sent. the 2nd step will be a visit, you have no legal remit to engage with them at all, i i would not do so under any circumstances, that visit will add a further £235 fee those are the only things a bailiff can do. the most they can charge is a total of £310.   police do not ever get involved in civil matters like CTAX debt. not sure where you ever got that idea from.   its saturday now so use the W/end wisely, get reading up HERE ONLY it might well pay you on monday to go RING the council CTAX dept and plead poverty etc etc. it might also pay you to find the email address or even better phone number of your local MP and get him involved. they can do wonders.   dx 
    • NPAP see here: VCS Spycar PCN PAPLOC now Claimform - no stopping - London Southend Airport ***Claim Dismissed*** - Page 7 - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group
    • Hi Stu and dx1000uk,   I have done the online assessment and as I suspected I already receive the maximum benefits available to me.   Yes I was referring to the fact that some times I know that non-payment of council tax can lead to imprisonment so thanks for clarifying.   let's say I can't make their demands for payment and they do send bailiffs in, I assume these are the type of bailiffs I can just not let in and then after a certain amount of attempts they give up right? does the council then not send the police round? This is what I can't work out and worries me.   The council already know that I am struggling and can't make the payments but when do I get my chance to tell a court or the police that it's not that I don't want to pay but that I can't pay?    Walshy
    • Hi Stu and dx1000uk,   I have done the online assessment and as I suspected I already receive the maximum benefits available ot me. Yes I was referring to the fact that some times I know that non-payment of council tax can lead to imprisonment so thanks for clarifying. But let's say I can't make their demands for payment and they do send bailiffs in, I assume these are the type of bailiffs I can just not let in and then after a certain amount of attempts they give up right? But does the council then not send the police round? This is what I can't work out and worries me. The council already know that I am struggling and can't make the payments but when do I get my chance to tell a court or the police that it's not that I don't want to pay but that I can't pay?    Walshy
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Intelligent Finance/Blair, Oliver & Scott


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3770 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I really need some more urgent advice on this matter.

 

A few weeks ago iQor sent me a letter saying they were no longer handling this case and I can only surmise it was because they found they didn't have a copy of the updated CCA so knew they didn't have a leg to stand on.

 

As for Wescot I haven't heard a thing from them in almost two months and that's after me sending them a letter with a copy of previous correspondence from the St Andrew's Group.

 

Last week I sent a letter to Intelligent Finance because I am just so annoyed that this debacle is continuing.

 

In it I told them that the account had been passed on from one company to another and that I was originally paying on a loan with no CCA, that all these companies have continually broken the law, that I wanted the default removed and that I thought it was only courtesy if they refunded that money.

 

This morning I received a letter from IF's Chester branch which, although I first thought was a response to my last letter, it seems in fact that Wescot had passed my complaint back to IF as their letter was written before they could possibly have received my last letter.

 

They continually apologised for every mistake and lack of communication but then said that the debt is enforceable and also sent a copy of the original CCA (this despite me asking for the updated agreement). They also said they'd informed Wescot to put the debt on hold for 30 days.

 

So where do I go from here?

 

Do I wait for them to reply to my recent letter and am I still in a strong position? And are they just trying to bully me into paying this off despite the fact all the companies involved have continually broken the law?

 

bump

 

Anybody?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Unfortunately not. I know there's a scanner at work but for obvious reasons I can't use that.

 

The problem is not so much to do with the original CCA but because of the way the situation has evolved it's surely the updated CCA (or lack of one) that is important here?

 

It's over a year since I last posted in this thread so I thought I'd give an update.

 

In June last year I wrote to the Financial Ombudsman with details of my complaint against Halifax/Intelligent Finance. Since then I've had several letters from the FO confirming they are still looking into the matter and apologising for the continuing delay.

 

They then wrote to me in February saying they were still waiting to hear from the Halifax and would be in touch as soon as possible.

 

This morning I received another letter from FO to say they would soon be able to allocate my complaint to an adjudicator (certainly by June 11). It's slightly strange that I've already had three letters signed by an adjudicator.

 

So does anybody have any idea what exactly happens from hereon in? And I'm guessing that because an adjudicator is involved the FO believe Halifax have a case to answer?

 

I would be very grateful if somebody could offer any further advice.

 

It's a little while since I've been on here but still have my claim against IF ongoing.

 

I've had different adjudicators from the Financial Ombudsman looking into the case over the past few months.

 

One recently got in touch with IF asking for compensation because of the "stress and inconvenience" they'd caused me. They gave them a two week period to get in touch, but with no response forthcoming they then gave them a further two weeks.

 

During that time, though, the adjudicator moved departments so another one was given the case.

 

As of last week (which was the cut-off point for the compensation request) they still hadn't heard anything.

 

But I received an email yesterday from the adjudicator asking for a little more information from me because they understood that the debt had been sold to a third party. They wanted to know if I'd set up any agreements with the new lender and what the outstanding balance was.

 

I informed them that I'd never been told by IF that the debt had been sold, although I had received letters from various organistions who I felt were departments associated to IF. I did tell them though that all correspondence related to these organisations were included in the evidence I sent the Ombudsman.

 

Within minutes after sending that email to the Ombudsman they replied to me saying that IF had been back in touch and they'd said that the debt hadn't been sold on and that it was "merely written-off".

 

The adjudicator was looking to clarify this with IF, but it begs the question why had IF not informed either me or the Ombudsman that this was the case? If it is confirmed that the debt is written-off then is that the end of the case? And where do I stand in reclaiming any amounts on the original loan?

 

bump

 

PLEASE, I really need some urgent advice.

 

I'll only be able to keep this one short as I'm off to work in a bit, but can post further details later on if required.

 

I've received the findings from the Financial Ombudsman this morning and basically he's found in favour of Intelligent Finance.

 

In his letter he stated that: "you hold a debt that needs to be repaid. I do, however, feel your complaint could have been handled more efficiently, expeditiously and with greater attention to detail".

 

He said according to a letter from IF: "the only agreement that was cancelled was a previous consolidation loan".

 

He went on to say: "I have discussed all the issues with IF and confirm the outstanding debt amounting to £xxxxxxxxxx was written off on 27 January 2009".

 

I had also been told by the Financial Ombudsman previously that although it seemed the debt was sold to a third party, two weeks ago IF then got in touch to say it hadn't been sold on and as you can see above was written off on January 27. So why did companies such as Wescot chase me for this?

 

As the FO seems to have found in favour of IF does it mean they'll now be able to start chasing me for the balance again?

 

Why, even though the loan has been in dispute for a long period and under the attention of the FO, did IF write it off?

 

And it's interesting that I've been offered £200 by IF for "the issues and delays in respect of responding to your complaint".

 

Please, can somebody give me some further advice and tell me where I stand now?

 

I should add that I feel the FO has given IF more than the allotted time to respond to previous correspondence during this claim.

 

Originally a previous advisor said they were giving them a couple of weeks and as there was no response they were given a further two weeks. At the end of this period a different advisor took over the case and had still heard nothing and during one afternoon where I was in email conversation with this advisor they'd asked me for more clarification of correspondence between myself and IF. Then all of a sudden he said he'd received an email from IF in which they stated the debt had been written off.

 

So it seems they've been allowed to push the boundaries to suit their requirements. And it seems it not only did IF my letters they also ignored communication from the FO as well.

 

Regards

 

Please somebody I need some/any advice to my above post.

 

I'm very worried and frightened over the matter so would appreciate anybody's input.

 

It seems I'm close to a conclusion on this long running saga.

 

I received a final decision from the Financial Ombudsman this morning although I was wondering if someone could clarify a couple of points.

 

In part of his decision he states that: "Intelligent Finance agreed to abide by his findings and said it would not pursue the debt in future or sell to a third party".

 

However, in his final conclusion upholding my complaint he said he orders IF to reduce the outstanding loan debt by £1,000 and to contact me to "say whether it intends to pursue the remaining debt and, if so, to negotiate and agree a repayment programme for the remaining balance".

 

So a little confused on that one???

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 years later...

Wow - when you say long-running you mean it.

 

Have you tried phoning the adjudicator at the FOS and asking directly what they meant? It does seem they've contradicted themselves there. They're generally quite good on the phone once you manage to get a call returned.

 

Otherwise - is anyone pursuing you at the moment? If not I think it's a case of just putting it in the box and not worrying about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...